General Discussion

Ino

(3,366 posts)

34. Interesting conclusion at that link...

Mon May 5, 2014, 06:11 PM

May 2014

The real difference between Egyptian mythology and the story of Jesus is that the former is clearly a fable full of beings with super powers, whereas the latter is told in realistic terms with the occasional miracle thrown in. The simplest explanation for this is that the New Testament is largely about a real person, with embellishments added to impress the rubes or make a doctrinal point. I venture to say this was the working assumption among a sizable fraction of scholars for a long time, and many still hold to it. But I’d also say there’s a hardening realization that, setting aside obvious supernatural elements, we’ll never know which if any parts of the Gospel describe actual events and which are made up.

The story of Jesus is "realistic" with the "occasional miracle thrown in"... it's largely about a "real person" with "embellishments added to impress the rubes." LOLOL

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Neil deGrasse Tyson Exposes Myths of Christmas, Sets Off Creationist Alarm Bells [View all] xchrom May 2014 OP

The story on Bruno was highlighting one of the big themes in the History of Science. NutmegYankee May 2014 #1

And Organized Religion opposed their use of the story tclambert May 2014 #18

I believe science more than the heat induced hallucinations of itinerant sheep herders. hobbit709 May 2014 #2

Homosexuality is a sin, says the book that laid out rules for selling your kids into slavery Major Nikon May 2014 #12

love that photo Ed Suspicious May 2014 #29

+1000 Tom Ripley May 2014 #22

Sometimes it hurts.... N_E_1 for Tennis May 2014 #3

Arguing with the creationists is a pointless endeavor and only gives credence to their POV Exposethefrauds May 2014 #4

^^THIS^^ Tom Ripley May 2014 #23

Idiots. The burning of Bruno is precisely Solomon May 2014 #5

For those like me who are clueless. Giordano Bruno: rgbecker May 2014 #6

I loved Sacha Baron Cohen's biography about him. Orrex May 2014 #7

After reading that I have to wonder what they found objectionable justiceischeap May 2014 #25

Bruno believed that the stars were other suns, and likely had planets and life too arcane1 May 2014 #26

As always the Christian Right JackInGreen May 2014 #8

I was astonished at the creationist pushback when Chicago's Adler Planetarium Snarkoleptic May 2014 #9

^ this video... DaDeacon May 2014 #19

Interesting conclusion at that link... Ino May 2014 #34

That paragraph was a bit kettle and pot... DaDeacon May 2014 #36

Well, I suppose it's difficult... Ino May 2014 #37

Jesus definitely represents the sun in the age of Pices. arcane1 May 2014 #27

I don't know about you The Wizard May 2014 #10

Mark Twain had it right “Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference" hobbit709 May 2014 #11

I don't know which is sadder - the fundamentalists who insist hedgehog May 2014 #13

"I don't know which is sadder" amuse bouche May 2014 #16

As far as the second group goes - hedgehog May 2014 #24

+1 (nt) Nine May 2014 #17

-5 (nt) amuse bouche May 2014 #21

The saddest are those who must construct a "both sides do it" to feel superior. (nt) jeff47 May 2014 #31

+1 n/t Silent3 May 2014 #32

The 'both sides' nonsense amuse bouche May 2014 #33

I'm going to have to marathon this show when GoT is finished. chrisa May 2014 #14

There's big money in peddling creationism Cyrano May 2014 #15

The whole lot makes my skin crawl amuse bouche May 2014 #20

I love Cosmos Gothmog May 2014 #28

About time Fox aired something good nt Jemon May 2014 #30

using Bruno (or Galileo, or Hypatia) as some sort of "science martyr" is one of those MisterP May 2014 #35