Monica fa-chrissakes Lewisnky is back in the news again.

[bvar22]

19. A good BJ never dies,

but I really wish THAT one would just fade away.
I wonder if they will drag out the Blue Dress?
I believe we can COUNT on it if Hillary is the nominee.


Presidential Politics long ago became a Media Driven HomeComing Court Event,
and NOT about The ISSUES.

Control of the presidential debates has been a ground of struggle for more than two decades. The role was filled by the nonpartisan League of Women Voters (LWV) civic organization in 1976, 1980 and 1984. In 1987, the LWV withdrew from debate sponsorship, in protest of the major party candidates attempting to dictate nearly every aspect of how the debates were conducted. On October 2, 1988, the LWV's 14 trustees voted unanimously to pull out of the debates, and on October 3 they issued a press release:

[font size=3]" The League of Women Voters is withdrawing sponsorship of the presidential debates...because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter. It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."[/font]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_debates

"the hoodwinking of the American public"
I have not seen a more apt description of Corporate Duopoly Politics.
In 2012, MSNBC Debate Analysis featured a category called "Best Zingers" to help America decide who "won" the debate.
This criteria was also heavily featured at DU.


I'm glad I'm old and grow my own food.