Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
5. A tale of two terrorist attacks
Tue May 6, 2014, 04:27 PM
May 2014

05/06/14
By Steve Benen

A terrorist attack on a U.S. outpost in the Middle East. Americans killed. Congressional hearings. Evidence that the administration failed to take security as seriously as it should have.

It was over 30 years ago that a terrorist attack on a U.S. Marine compound in Beirut killed 241 American servicemen, which came just six months after militants had bombed the U.S. embassy in Beirut, killing 63 people, including 17 Americans. Jane Mayer, who covered the attack in Lebanon at the time, reflects today on the domestic political environment – and how much it’s changed.

There were more than enough opportunities to lay blame for the horrific losses at high U.S. officials’ feet. But unlike today’s Congress, congressmen did not talk of impeaching Ronald Reagan, who was then President, nor were any subpoenas sent to cabinet members. This was true even though then, as now, the opposition party controlled the majority in the House. Tip O’Neill, the Democratic Speaker of the House, was no pushover. He, like today’s opposition leaders in the House, demanded an investigation – but a real one, and only one. Instead of playing it for political points, a House committee undertook a serious investigation into what went wrong at the barracks in Beirut. Two months later, it issued a report finding “very serious errors in judgment” by officers on the ground, as well as responsibility up through the military chain of command, and called for better security measures against terrorism in U.S. government installations throughout the world.

In other words, Congress actually undertook a useful investigation and made helpful recommendations. The report’s findings, by the way, were bipartisan. (The Pentagon, too, launched an investigation, issuing a report that was widely accepted by both parties.)


Six months after the terrorist attack, militants struck American officials in Beirut again, killing the CIA’s station chief. This happened during an election year, but I can find no evidence of any federal politician using this in television attack ads. And six months after that, terrorists bombed a U.S. government outpost in Beirut once more – in the middle of Reagan’s re-election campaign. The then-president conceded at the time that repairs at the U.S. embassy annex were behind schedule, telling the public, “Anyone who’s ever had their kitchen done over knows that it never gets done as soon as you wish it would.”

Again, no hearings. No attack ads. No select committee. No subpoenas. No organized conspiracy theories pushed by members of Congress or their media allies. No talk about impeaching the president.

read more: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/tale-two-terrorist-attacks









Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

RONALD REAGAN’S BENGHAZI [View all] napkinz May 2014 OP
K&R liberal N proud May 2014 #1
Worse yet, moondust May 2014 #2
Reagan's role in 9/11 ... napkinz May 2014 #4
k/r Dawson Leery May 2014 #3
A tale of two terrorist attacks napkinz May 2014 #5
3,000 plus Americans were murdered during 9/11 malaise May 2014 #6
Bush was warned and did nothing ... napkinz May 2014 #7
But but but malaise May 2014 #8
two great quotes! napkinz May 2014 #9
Benghazi kardonb May 2014 #10
don't forget Iraq napkinz May 2014 #13
A tale of two terrorist attacks ProSense May 2014 #11
We Don't Claim Issa in San Diego ProgressiveJarhead May 2014 #12
This is how I hear it... humbled_opinion May 2014 #14
"never before has a President and SecState intentionally and for purely political reasons lied ... napkinz May 2014 #16
They argue context... humbled_opinion May 2014 #17
do you have any rational co-workers? napkinz May 2014 #20
No isn't it a shame... humbled_opinion May 2014 #22
Two days later, he invaded big bad Grenada RufusTFirefly May 2014 #15
Pre-emptive RW response: Blue_Tires May 2014 #18
K&R! The replies too! nt XRubicon May 2014 #19
Excellent accurate frame, napkinz.. from Jane Mayer.. And Also Remember gop "Absolutely Defunded.." Cha May 2014 #21
thanks Cha napkinz May 2014 #23
The republican Benghazi is 9/11 IronLionZion May 2014 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RONALD REAGAN’S BENGHAZI»Reply #5