Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Antivaccine versus anti-GMO: Different goals, same methods [View all]Tumbulu
(6,278 posts)46. Oh yes, resort to the old put downs trying always to ridicule others.
The take home message is that bullies took over science and continue to attack anyone who dares to question the safety of gmo's without the benefir of public testing.
Case in point you. Scientific papers, or peer reviewed papers paid for by industry are simply fictional articles as far as I am concerened.
And you have not answered the Bt toxin question.
That is because it is not defensible.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I disagree. I think both attitudes are the result of unfounded fear based on bad science.
Buzz Clik
Jun 2013
#8
I'm still skeptical of GMO's and trying to educate myself on this subject.
mountain grammy
Jun 2013
#13
Similar invective was used for those opposed to the unabated use of fossil fuels
whatchamacallit
Jun 2013
#23