Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "The Numbers Don’t Lie: Jeb Bush Can’t Beat Hillary Clinton" [View all]wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)27. How is this "Monarchy style?"
A monarch is "the sole and absolute head of a state, either in reality, symbolically or in an encumbered manner. A monarch typically either inherits sovereignty (often referred to as the throne) by birth or is elected monarch and typically rules for life or until abdication"
A Clinton v. Bush campaign doesn't remotely resemble that, there is no law barring members of the same family from running for president.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
...That explains the recent dredging up of Benghazi. Its all they have left. Just like Jeb.
misterhighwasted
May 2014
#2
Sadly true. In this age of BRAND LOYALTY and hyper partisanship, both the Dems and the GOP have
TrollBuster9090
May 2014
#17
Yes, but many of us are not interested in yet another definition of "real progressive"
wyldwolf
May 2014
#11
How you think that op is Gospel is bizarre. I don't care what some poll says two years out
doc03
May 2014
#25
Where did I say it was gospel? On the other hand, I have no reason to discount the poll
wyldwolf
May 2014
#26
Gee don't get your blood pressure up, ok Hillary is a shoe-in let's just anoint her
doc03
May 2014
#44
Interesting point, but in 2007 there were three Dem candidates who all had similar approval ratings
TrollBuster9090
May 2014
#16
Jeeze I wish we could dredge up relatives of Carter, Reagan, Nixon, Humphrey or Mondale
Armstead
May 2014
#13
I agree, but at least Hilary Clinton is a Clinton by MARRIAGE, rather than a birth entitlement.
TrollBuster9090
May 2014
#15
Neither Clinton or Bush are a part of the government - It isn't Oligarchy, either.
wyldwolf
May 2014
#30
BREAKING! Hillary eats ravioli, signals her allegiance with corporate Italian canned food PAC
wyldwolf
May 2014
#37
Actually, Paul's support comes from both stoners AND racists who want to repeal the Civil Rights Act
TrollBuster9090
May 2014
#14
Definition of insanity: electing the same leaders over and over and expecting different results.
Initech
May 2014
#39
Whoever it is, there's going to be A LOT of money behind the next Republican candidate.
tofuandbeer
May 2014
#45