Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
45. Some of this makes very little sense.
Wed May 7, 2014, 12:44 PM
May 2014

For instance, Sen Richard Burr complains that "We have veterans dying from long waits for basic, necessary tests like colonoscopies,” but this bill would "expanding several veterans benefits, including dental and medical care ... that currently apply only to post-Sept. 11 veterans." But the bill does not, apparently, create more facilities, so the Senator wants to actually make waithing times longer and cause more veterans to die while waiting for care.

If you think about it, adding pre-9/11 veterans to the post-9/11 veterans means that combat veterans will get less care so that noncombat veterans can be cared for. That is a nonstarter for me, and I am pre-9/11 and a noncombat veteran. I have avoided the VA like the plague because I am not going to inject myself into a queue of men and women who are vastly more deserving of the VA's limited resources than I am.

The bill would have exceeded the "VA spending limit established under the budget Congress and President Obama approved in December," so the money is supposedly coming from "savings from reduced overseas contingency operations, formerly known as the global war on terrorism," otherwise known as the war in Afghanistan, except that this money is off-budget money and is currently being paid for with borrowed money.

I applaud the 41. This bill should not pass. It reduces benefits for combat veterans, and it spends more money than was agreed to by both sides in the budgeting process.

A seperate bill which reverses the pensions cuts should pass.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K & R Le Taz Hot May 2014 #1
Yes indeed! NYC_SKP May 2014 #2
Before I look sarisataka May 2014 #3
Yes, mine is on the list. (Portman R-OH) SamKnause May 2014 #4
Been trying to get rid AnneD May 2014 #5
In my experience, the military supports the GOP. freebrew May 2014 #44
Almost all Veterans are Republicans, same as cops. Most are so brainwashed the Dustlawyer May 2014 #79
Thanks, Grassley. Frustratedlady May 2014 #6
Grassley's military service: NONE progressoid May 2014 #20
Thanks! Figures. Quite a contrast to Harkin. eom Frustratedlady May 2014 #89
Hmmm . . . Something In Common Here . . . cer7711 May 2014 #7
I do not see the "something in common" (LOL) Laf.La.Dem. May 2014 #31
Just a guess, but could it be the letter R after all their names? Rhiannon12866 May 2014 #83
A little too generic for me to jump on board. JayhawkSD May 2014 #8
Very good point. deutsey May 2014 #15
You REALLY have to wonder about something rejected by all those Republicans?? WinkyDink May 2014 #66
This message was self-deleted by its author nikto May 2014 #76
R#9 & K for, the same, tired list of Rethugs. Here's what the bill was about: UTUSN May 2014 #9
Kirk, Grassley, Toomey and especially Johnson Firebrand Gary May 2014 #10
Only in the US does 41 beat 59 mikeysnot May 2014 #11
Wasn't this in February ? OP says just. N/T karadax May 2014 #12
That's the problem with a graphic that says "this week" and no date jberryhill May 2014 #22
Bill #s would be nice too. karadax May 2014 #26
I do too. joeglow3 May 2014 #53
S.1982 karadax May 2014 #64
Shame? Cartoonist May 2014 #13
From my understanding it was two things that caused R's to vote no. karadax May 2014 #21
Obfuscation Cartoonist May 2014 #25
Nope sakabatou May 2014 #14
According to this link, this was in February.. Stuart G May 2014 #16
Who knows jberryhill May 2014 #23
the R folk shed tears of love over the military oldandhappy May 2014 #17
BASTARDS! AsahinaKimi May 2014 #18
I was surprised the president didn't stomp on Ed Henry last week Doctor_J May 2014 #19
Reposting on FB!! K&R! hue May 2014 #24
Billboards nationwide! SoapBox May 2014 #27
McCain???? Shame!!!!!!!!!!!! heaven05 May 2014 #28
Well, thats easy 90-percent May 2014 #29
Look like: El Shaman May 2014 #30
K&R n/t Feral Child May 2014 #32
Republicans...we support the troops...pathetic SummerSnow May 2014 #33
Wow, McCain..the so called model soldier..the veteran.. SummerSnow May 2014 #34
I've always held out hope... Jeff In Milwaukee May 2014 #37
party loyalty first is the GOP SummerSnow May 2014 #67
It is now, I suppose... Jeff In Milwaukee May 2014 #69
Im really surprised at him. It would be interesting to know his reasons SummerSnow May 2014 #70
My bi-polar Wisconsin Senate Delegation Jeff In Milwaukee May 2014 #35
LOL! Enthusiast May 2014 #47
And now, they want to get rid of General Shinseki. Hekate May 2014 #36
Sure enough, Tool-me is on the list! Aldo Leopold May 2014 #38
Susan Collins shows how moderate she really is jopacaco May 2014 #39
My Retired Marine Neighbor Wellstone ruled May 2014 #40
Both of mine, inhofe and coburn madokie May 2014 #41
The Costs of Care for Veterans is going up . . FairWinds May 2014 #42
Bastardi!!!!! MADem May 2014 #43
Some of this makes very little sense. JayhawkSD May 2014 #45
But as a Vet, on principle... nikto May 2014 #77
We have too many knees jerking in this nation JayhawkSD May 2014 #81
This message was self-deleted by its author santamargarita May 2014 #46
CHICKENhawks Enthusiast May 2014 #48
Support the troops by screwing them IronLionZion May 2014 #49
yet many of these same senators will get re-elected....stupid nation spanone May 2014 #50
All (R-**) Martin Eden May 2014 #51
A kick JustAnotherGen May 2014 #52
John McCain jaysunb May 2014 #54
I clean house for a man 78 years old and has carried shrapnel in his back for the last 40+ years notadmblnd May 2014 #55
We should clean house this year at the polls and get rid of these unpatriotic Republican azzholes!! Major Hogwash May 2014 #63
All Republicans! Stainless May 2014 #56
Any DINO's in there?!! Wouldn't surprise me AT ALL. "Bi-partisanship," y'know! blkmusclmachine May 2014 #57
They didnt need their DINO's this time so the DINO's voted with the Democrats most likely. rhett o rick May 2014 #65
Surprisingly Enough, Dean Heller's Name Is Not There Leith May 2014 #58
any comment from the american legion JI7 May 2014 #59
No money for Vets or the Unemployed, but how about more Millionaire tax cuts? whathehell May 2014 #60
Et tu, McCain? NastyRiffraff May 2014 #61
That's YOU, Susan Collins... MarianJack May 2014 #62
KICK! Cha May 2014 #68
you know, I am not even surprised to see insane mccain's name on that list. niyad May 2014 #71
I hate Mark Kirk.... Stellar May 2014 #72
The Democrats on that list should be especially ashamed for being such scumbags! nikto May 2014 #73
GOP Hates Vets nikto May 2014 #74
John frikkin' McCain TOO?! OMG nikto May 2014 #75
GOP does hate Vets quarbis May 2014 #78
Both of mine. nt awoke_in_2003 May 2014 #80
Sad to say both of mine did. AverageJoe90 May 2014 #82
and now rtracey May 2014 #84
kick....veterans are pawns in republican games...nothing more. props. spanone May 2014 #85
What was the bill number? jpak May 2014 #86
What do unborn babies and solders have in common? Sam1 May 2014 #87
This happened February 27 Generic Other May 2014 #88
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It can't be posted enough...»Reply #45