Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Obama Never Fails To Disappoint [View all]zeemike
(18,998 posts)54. How soon we forgit...
Expansion of prisons to house Gitmo detainees rejected in House
The House on Tuesday evening defeated a Democratic attempt to let the government spend money to expand U.S. prisons so they can house terrorist suspects now held in Guantánamo Bay.
Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.) proposed an amendment to the military construction spending bill for 2014 that would kill language prohibiting funds from being used to expand U.S. prisons for this purpose.
Language in the bill, H.R. 2216, holds that "none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense in this Act may be used to construct, renovate, or expand any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense."
Moran urged members to support his amendment to strike this language. Aside from arguing that holding terrorist suspects in Cuba does not meet U.S. standards of justice, he said there are other reasons why it is better for the United States to hold them in the country.
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/303455-house-rejects-expansion-of-us-prisons-to-house-guantanamo-detainees#ixzz314STwmQ8
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
The House on Tuesday evening defeated a Democratic attempt to let the government spend money to expand U.S. prisons so they can house terrorist suspects now held in Guantánamo Bay.
Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.) proposed an amendment to the military construction spending bill for 2014 that would kill language prohibiting funds from being used to expand U.S. prisons for this purpose.
Language in the bill, H.R. 2216, holds that "none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense in this Act may be used to construct, renovate, or expand any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense."
Moran urged members to support his amendment to strike this language. Aside from arguing that holding terrorist suspects in Cuba does not meet U.S. standards of justice, he said there are other reasons why it is better for the United States to hold them in the country.
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/303455-house-rejects-expansion-of-us-prisons-to-house-guantanamo-detainees#ixzz314STwmQ8
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am dissapointed in him because he has so far not RSVP'ed your invitation. It's
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#1
When I agreed to chair one of the local committees in Obama's 2012 campaign,
maddiemom
May 2014
#128
Revenue bills originate in the House, but the Senate still has to pass them.
NYC Liberal
May 2014
#67
Okay..is it that you do not understand that not only was the money cut off, but specific legislation
msanthrope
May 2014
#114
You do realize that the Youngstown decision proves you historically inaacurate? nt
msanthrope
May 2014
#121
The fact that you're unaware that the President can't unilaterally close Gitmo ...
11 Bravo
May 2014
#28
Like Cornel West, I am disappointed that I didn't get front row seats to his inaugural
Liberal_Stalwart71
May 2014
#27
When he was elected POTUS, did you include or excluse his entourage-
No Vested Interest
May 2014
#36
I'm disappointed because he gave me a painted pony and I wanted a black one with white socks.
aikoaiko
May 2014
#58
I did't get a pony, either...but I got a horse a little later on. Maybe there's a lesson of
maddiemom
May 2014
#132
Still waiting for my Anti-Gravity Boots and Free Government Blow Job Robot
thelordofhell
May 2014
#78
URinvited:Dinner in Minneapolis/June 26/$32,400 per couple/$20,000 4 photo op with Obama
Divernan
May 2014
#124
I have invited him to every one of my birthday parties since he was elected.
Lint Head
May 2014
#127
I share your disappointment. He clearly is not interested in doing anything about
rhett o rick
May 2014
#135