Your thinking is so much like mine, from post #37 to #95:
(#37) It's not about "sluts." It's about poor judgment. Trying to make it about "sluts" is a major fail and no one buys it anymore, at least if they have even a toe in this century. The idea of bringing up Monica in a "negative" way isn't about "shaming" her--it's to to throw dirt on Hillary.
(#76) How many posters are saying this stuff? Two? Three? Even five?
It's a few people expressing an opinion. Not all opinions have validity. By getting hyperbolic about them, you grant them more attention than they merit.
(#95) Further, the point of any Oooh-la-la-ing over this ancient tale of lust, poetry books and pizza is not about "shaming" Monica, it's to do with EMBARRASSING Bill--no fool like an old fool, can't keep his weenie in his trousers, doesn't he go for the chubby ones, the usual schtick that they like to drag out to try to revive an old tale. It's also about trying to throw Hillary off her game, to insert Monica into the conversation, to say "Ha ha ha, Hillary can't keep her man!" "Look at Hillary, she stuck with a cheater, Bill doesn't lurrrrrrrv her!!!!"
It's all horse shit, covered in chocolate sauce, and plenty of fools will eat it up like ice cream.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read