Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tommy_Carcetti

(44,519 posts)
61. The difference between RT and others...
Thu May 8, 2014, 11:54 AM
May 2014

....is that RT is state owned. And while I don't necessarily oppose government running certain things (fire, police, highways, I would argue health care as well), the media is not one of those things. Like religion, there has to be a separation from the state in order to ensure the legitimacy of both. White it is easy just to label just about any news source as corporate media, that alone does not make their reporting inherently

I'm certainly not disputing that at various times during its history, the U.S. has played a hand in participating the forcible ouster of democratically elected governments. Iran, Chile, etc. But just because it has happened in the past does not mean it has happened in Ukraine. And frankly, the evidence to support that the regime change that occurred in February 2014 was in fact some western organized coup is extremely, extremely thin (notwithstanding how emphatically proponents of those theory claim it to be true.)

The same facts are repeated over and over and those repeating them insist it is smoking gun evidence of a western led coup. Those "facts" include Victoria Nuland handing out cookies to Maidan protesters...which frankly is comical if that can be considered evidence that the US was leading the charge. Then there's the quote about the $5 billion in aid to Ukraine. However, when one considers that the figure represents a 20 year period lasting over various presidential administrations (both Ukrainian and US), there's nothing that really suggests impropriety on its face. Finally, there was the taped phone call between Nuland and Pratt where they are discussing their preference for Yanukovych's successor. While that might initially raise a few eyebrows, there's nothing intrinsically nefarious about it when it all gets boiled down. People will discuss who they want in charge--that doesn't mean they will get those persons in charge. Hell, look here at DU ("I want Hillary!" "I want Warren!" etc.)

It's fun to get caught up in the different personalities, but I fear people are assigning much more power and influence to certain persons and factions than they actually deserve. In the end, McCain will be McCain, Nuland will be Nuland, and Svoboda will be Svoboda. There's been so much focus on those particular individuals because they are fun to kick around, but coup theorist place way too much importance all three (especially McCain and Nuland) in actually shaping events on the ground.

Really, what upsets me most about the western coup theorists is that they take a very patronizing tone towards ordinary Ukrainians, and then claim to be acting in their interests. Essentially, the idea is that Ukrainians are too stupid and simplistic to enact change on their own, or see that the West was pulling the strings. And in the end, Maidan was a very real, very popular and very large expression by many real and ordinary Ukrainians. There was real corruption in the Yanukovych government to be protested, and also many Ukrainians know their own history and they know close relations with Russia almost always causes great sorrow and strife for Ukraine. So they spoke out against it, Yanukovych pushed back in a most violent manner which only got the protesters even more angry, and finally when things reached a fever pitch Yanukovych chose to take his ball and go home. And needing an interim government before elections could be held, one was appointed in the meantime. It's really as simple and straight forward as that.

While I appreciate your very civil tone in your response to me, I simply cannot agree with you as to much on anything. I'm not accusing you of being an apologist for Vladimir Putin (although there are others on here that arguably do fall into that category) and I no doubt believe you see in good faith improper Western influence in various world affairs (not necessarily an imaginary problem, but one that has its limits). But Ukraine simply is not 1950s Iran or 1970s Chile. In cases like those, there were fingerprints and signs of our involvement that just don't exist here.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This should be fun AnalystInParadise May 2014 #1
Bbbut..... So is the media starting to wake up, or are they realizing they can't newthinking May 2014 #2
Either way, it's nice to finally see some real journalism coming from the NYT PoliticalPothead May 2014 #3
Got it. Real journalism = shit you agree with. Propoganda = shit you disagree with. 11 Bravo May 2014 #40
Real journalism = going to the place where things are happening and talking to the people involved. PoliticalPothead May 2014 #42
+1000 joeybee12 May 2014 #45
No, they got caught so many times publishing lies and they are being trashed sabrina 1 May 2014 #24
Well stated, Sabrina 1... KoKo May 2014 #49
So, they have the same weapons as the army Recursion May 2014 #4
Just like Maidan did, the have also taken an armory newthinking May 2014 #5
Did you read the NYT article? PoliticalPothead May 2014 #6
Yes, the article that literally said they had Army weapons Recursion May 2014 #7
Most of those weapons were not paid for. They took them from police buildings. PoliticalPothead May 2014 #9
Maybe they didn't want to publish something they have no evidence for, being that the public sabrina 1 May 2014 #26
The entire f#ckin articles a lie. The NYT reporters never said there weren't any Russians in okaawhatever May 2014 #37
Original NYT article here dipsydoodle May 2014 #8
Those who support Western interference don't care about the truth malaise May 2014 #10
Same with those who support Russian intererence Duckhunter935 May 2014 #11
Well, there are no supporters of Russian Interference here and from interviews in the world wide sabrina 1 May 2014 #29
Ukraine doesn't want to hold the elections that Ukraine itself had scheduled? Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #30
When was there an election? There was coup and a president was installed by a small fraction of sabrina 1 May 2014 #34
All of the individuals in the Ukrainian government were elected members of Parliament. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #35
Let them hold a real election of all those in the 'interim' govt. That is the ONLY way sabrina 1 May 2014 #41
It's not the truth. If you'd bother to read the NYT article, you'd realize they never said there okaawhatever May 2014 #38
Typical RT snowjob. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #12
Nothing in that RT article is false, so I don't see the spin you're referring to. PoliticalPothead May 2014 #13
You do know that presidential elections are scheduled this month, right? Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #14
I'm sorry, when was there an election held? When did the people vote for the current regime? PoliticalPothead May 2014 #16
Clearly you don't understand parliamentary politics. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #18
The interim president and prime minister were not elected by the people. PoliticalPothead May 2014 #20
They're elected officials. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #22
Elected by a corrupt parliament, not the people. PoliticalPothead May 2014 #23
What are you going to do with yourself after the May 25th elections? Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #25
If Right Sector thugs are still attacking and intimidating people, yes. PoliticalPothead May 2014 #27
You are giving Right Sector far more credit than they are probably due. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #28
Right Sector spearheaded the coup. They are a major element in the goings-on in Ukraine. PoliticalPothead May 2014 #36
"Anti-Kiev protesters" Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #43
You can choose to ignore the neo-Nazis in the interim government all you want. PoliticalPothead May 2014 #44
There was no election in Ukraine. And now nearly half the country does not accept the sabrina 1 May 2014 #32
The person you responded to is new here. Look at their recs and their posts and tell me if you think okaawhatever May 2014 #39
"...does not preclude Russian military intermingling and supplying these groups." Comrade Grumpy May 2014 #15
What's false in that article? We know we are supposed to be exposed to the 'Al Jazeera' treatment sabrina 1 May 2014 #31
It's misstating the Times article. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #33
GrahamWP_UK suggested that pro-unity protesters should have expected to be attacked by pro-russians penultimate May 2014 #47
He's a hack. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #48
Tommy, who do you trust for your news about events in Ukraine? KoKo May 2014 #51
I try to get a fair mix of reputable sources. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #53
Appreciate your reply ... KoKo May 2014 #59
The difference between RT and others... Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #61
RT has several war correspondents on the ground in Ukraine. Not just one. You might not want to sabrina 1 May 2014 #50
Nothing that RT has put forward has indicated it is an objective news source. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #55
Whis is another good reason for America to stay out of the squabble. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #17
Uncritical use of the phrase "self-defense forces" makes me question the neutrality and reliability. Donald Ian Rankin May 2014 #19
Thank heavens RT is there to interpret the NYT for me cthulu2016 May 2014 #21
Well, there's always Catherina News.... Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #57
These guys self-declare themselves as Russian Bosonic May 2014 #46
And an hour after shooting that video, Simon Ostrovsky was seized and kept in a basement for 4 days Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #56
Apparently not Bosonic May 2014 #58
If there's not already a meme with this guy showing up everywhere NuclearDem May 2014 #60
Slovyansk is an interesting case. Benton D Struckcheon May 2014 #52
Robert Parry titled it that way "Another NYT ‘Sort of’ Retraction on Ukraine" jakeXT May 2014 #54
... according to RT...nt SidDithers May 2014 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No Russians among Slavyan...»Reply #61