Jenny McCarthy does a major CYA...

[truedelphi]

221. Here is where you need to ask a few questions, and think long and ahrd about the answers:

Just whose studies were involved in saying hat vaccines are safe?

Why it is the Big Pharma's studies that are saying that the vaccines are safe.

If a scientists or researcher comes out and says, "Wait a minute, this needs to be done differently" WHAM, that poor person is blacklisted and made to be a pariah.

Hundreds of decent researchers have been blacklisted by industry, simply for wanting one of their findings to be taken seriously and to have things made right.

When an industry blunder is made public, the result is to try and make a pariah out of the reporters who uncover a needed truth:

Article in the UK "Mail"
on 15th August 2009


A warning that the new swine flu jab is linked to a deadly nerve disease has been sent by the (British) Government
to senior neurologists in a confidential letter. The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health, has been leaked to The Mail on Sunday, leading to demands to know why the information has not been given to the public before the vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins.

It tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered by the vaccine. GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, causing paralysis and inability to breathe, and can be fatal.

The letter, sent to about 600 neurologists on July 29, is the first sign that there is concern at the highest levels that the vaccine itself could cause serious complications. It refers to the use of a similar swine flu vaccine in the United States in 1976 when: More people died from the vaccination than from swine flu. 500 cases of GBS were detected.

The vaccine may have increased the risk of contracting GBS by eight times. The vaccine was withdrawn after just ten weeks when the link with Guillaume Barre Syndrom became clear... The US Government was forced to pay out millions of dollars to those affected. Concerns have already been raised that the new vaccine has not been sufficiently tested and that the effects, especially on children, are unknown.
#####

The only publication I know of that was able to publish some troublesome findings about the vaccine industry and left unpunished was the San Francisco Chronicle, which in 1999 or 2000, sent its reporters out to examine the conditions at US vaccine labs.

The SF Chronicle did this in an effort to show the public how trustworthy the entire process happens to be.

But the reporters were greeted by filthy laboratories that were in disrepair. Bacterial and viral contamination was rampant. So was mold and fungus. The reporters also uncovered a scarey truth: that the entire way that "inspections" occur is far too few, and always announced to the laboratory executives in advance.

The SF Chronicle expanded the series to let the public understand that if we are going to have vaccinations, we need to make the process safer. However, with the election of George W Bush, the entire process became even more disreputable, rather than improved.