Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Clinton: Even Killing Goldman Sachs CEO Wouldn't Satisfy 'Blood Lust' [View all]
Bill Clinton told former Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner that nothing would appease the populist "blood lust" for bankers -- not even slitting the throat of Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein in a dark alley.
That's according to a lengthy new article by Andrew Ross Sorkin published online Thursday for the New York Times magazine, which includes interviews with Geithner.
Here's the relevant excerpt about the former president from Sorkin's piece:
TPM
That's according to a lengthy new article by Andrew Ross Sorkin published online Thursday for the New York Times magazine, which includes interviews with Geithner.
Here's the relevant excerpt about the former president from Sorkin's piece:
[Geithner] cheerfully relayed a story that also appears in his book about the time he sought advice from Bill Clinton on how to pursue a more populist strategy: You could take Lloyd Blankfein into a dark alley, Clinton said, and slit his throat, and it would satisfy them for about two days. Then the blood lust would rise again.
TPM

112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton: Even Killing Goldman Sachs CEO Wouldn't Satisfy 'Blood Lust' [View all]
Capt. Obvious
May 2014
OP
Sort of a straw man hyperbolic distraction. How about just prosecuting the white collar criminals? nt
GoneFishin
May 2014
#4
I couldn't care less if the parasites live or die, but I bet the people he and his ilk robbed
redqueen
May 2014
#5
+1. They also don't realize that they've defined it as a Them vs. Us situation, where
winter is coming
May 2014
#36
It would be better to give them 20 years in a Supermax and strip them of every penny in assets
hobbit709
May 2014
#8
"Strip them of their assets",I agree, but I would sentence them to work at a fast-food for min wage.
rhett o rick
May 2014
#28
What an insult. Lloyd Blankfein is a man, the problem is the system that supports him.
arcane1
May 2014
#20
That is saved for those who allowed them to get away with it in Congress
Exposethefrauds
May 2014
#78
Is this the same Goldman Sachs that paid Hillary $400,000 to talk to them?
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#24
I see it as flat out corruption. This wasnt a campaign contribution, the money increased Ms.
rhett o rick
May 2014
#105
Sometimes, holding people accountable for their bad policy making decisions
Baitball Blogger
May 2014
#25
my my, one troll fantasizes about killing people and it makes others (who probably boast about being
dionysus
May 2014
#98
This is why I'm a Democrat. We have a party that is not afraid to stand up for the bankers!!
Douglas Carpenter
May 2014
#43
Loved what Elizabeth Warren said about how Geither saw his role in her new book...
flpoljunkie
May 2014
#61
That was a terrible thing for Clinton to say, it is disgusting to pass off the valid outrage and
Jefferson23
May 2014
#48
I wonder whether Clinton has any family or friends who lost their business or their home thanks
JDPriestly
May 2014
#52
Au contraire! His son-in-law has his very own hedge fund & a$10.5 million "flat".
Divernan
May 2014
#89
Reading your comment about "you can never make liberals happy" gave me dejavu
GoneFishin
May 2014
#82
I'm not saying Bill didn't say this, but remember, this is Geithner saying Bill said this...
joeybee12
May 2014
#70
It is NOT an issue of "blood lust"; but an issue of Justice that is paramount.
laserhaas
May 2014
#85