Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LLD

(136 posts)

46. If this is so hurtful to Hillary Clinton then...

Reply to Initech (Original post)

Thu May 8, 2014, 03:49 PM

May 2014

Why didn't we see Lewinsky in 2008? I don't see anything. But that doesn't mean the media doesn't want to tell you what you should see.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

OK let's get one thing straight about this Monica Lewinsky Crap. [View all] Initech May 2014 OP

Word. ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #1

How do you suggest we get out there? el_bryanto May 2014 #2

Good question. Louisiana1976 May 2014 #27

I agree, so let's stop starting threads about her and posting in them. nm rhett o rick May 2014 #3

fighting, really? oh, and 98.43% of the country doesn't care/give a shit snooper2 May 2014 #4

It's not just us. Initech May 2014 #5

I give it another 26 hours...there will be a tornado or a bridge collapse or shark attack snooper2 May 2014 #6

True that is a good point. Initech May 2014 #8

Sharknado!!! Mbrow May 2014 #25

Then ignore it. I would prefer the media would talk about Chained CPI and what it really means. sabrina 1 May 2014 #11

Well said. This Monica crap is diverting attention from other, much more important things. Louisiana1976 May 2014 #29

++ Tada. And it's just that simple. DirkGently May 2014 #35

well, then, let's bring out all of the bigot's and his father's hopemountain May 2014 #15

Nobody cared then libodem May 2014 #7

Nobody here, maybe. riqster May 2014 #10

But even back in the 90's libodem May 2014 #14

+1 million Louisiana1976 May 2014 #31

I expect you are correct about the majority. riqster May 2014 #37

Yep libodem May 2014 #41

the gop are scaert. they are going to throw out any shit hopemountain May 2014 #16

I agree and disagree. hamsterjill May 2014 #9

^^^^ yupyup nt hopemountain May 2014 #17

I'm waiting for the pugs to regurgitate Whitewater. n/t OnlinePoker May 2014 #23

when have they ever been afraid of beating something to death? PeaceNikki May 2014 #28

They aren't afraid. hamsterjill May 2014 #40

It's topics like this that remind me how DU skews old, cranky, and frankly more than a tad UPTIGHT. Warren DeMontague May 2014 #12

However, the reaction here and among other Democrats is part of what fuels this karynnj May 2014 #13

Every time they bring up Monica, dougg May 2014 #18

Benghazi!!! Phlem May 2014 #19

Before there was Benghazi, there was Blowghazi. Warren DeMontague May 2014 #44

Wonder how much TNNurse May 2014 #20

ML kardonb May 2014 #21

I don't think the big guys in the GOP will endorse Rand Paul... secondwind May 2014 #22

Monica Lewinsky Jimvanhise May 2014 #24

Monica Lewinsky is 40. JDPriestly May 2014 #26

Oh come on!!! Spitfire of ATJ May 2014 #30

Shame on president Clinton, that slut-bag! Now lets move along. Ed Suspicious May 2014 #32

I think this could have used a different headline. jtuck004 May 2014 #33

Monica Who??? progressoid May 2014 #34

Nice! LisaLynne May 2014 #38

Ha ha ha!!! I love it! Initech May 2014 #43

I don't think this is a conspiracy to hurt Hillary Clinton's political fortunes. totodeinhere May 2014 #36

If it is, it's a stupid and misguided one ... LisaLynne May 2014 #39

yep libodem May 2014 #42

I'm tired of hearing about Lewinsky and no I'm not a diehard Clinton supporter 951-Riverside May 2014 #45

If this is so hurtful to Hillary Clinton then... LLD May 2014 #46

Can I take it further than you? nadinbrzezinski May 2014 #47