Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Clinton: Even Killing Goldman Sachs CEO Wouldn't Satisfy 'Blood Lust' [View all]Rex
(65,616 posts)31. Why is there bloodlust, why would there be such animosity toward the 1% Bill?
Why would we want to murder someone, what was so horrible that the 1% deserve to have their throat slit? Can the ex-POTUS answer that or does he just feel good, because he's defending his wifes meal ticket?
That's pathetic, Bill Clinton making cheesy statements to deflect from the real problem OR even addressing the real problem. I am always disappointed when someone I expect to act like an adult, instead plays CYA for the 1% who (last time I checked) are rich beyond belief from criminal behavior.
I don't want someone murdered in a dark alley, I want them to face criminal charges and a court date. I guess that is too much to expect in America now that a plutocracy is in charge and running things.
Fucking SIGH.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Clinton: Even Killing Goldman Sachs CEO Wouldn't Satisfy 'Blood Lust' [View all]
Capt. Obvious
May 2014
OP
Sort of a straw man hyperbolic distraction. How about just prosecuting the white collar criminals? nt
GoneFishin
May 2014
#4
I couldn't care less if the parasites live or die, but I bet the people he and his ilk robbed
redqueen
May 2014
#5
+1. They also don't realize that they've defined it as a Them vs. Us situation, where
winter is coming
May 2014
#36
It would be better to give them 20 years in a Supermax and strip them of every penny in assets
hobbit709
May 2014
#8
"Strip them of their assets",I agree, but I would sentence them to work at a fast-food for min wage.
rhett o rick
May 2014
#28
What an insult. Lloyd Blankfein is a man, the problem is the system that supports him.
arcane1
May 2014
#20
That is saved for those who allowed them to get away with it in Congress
Exposethefrauds
May 2014
#78
Is this the same Goldman Sachs that paid Hillary $400,000 to talk to them?
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#24
I see it as flat out corruption. This wasnt a campaign contribution, the money increased Ms.
rhett o rick
May 2014
#105
Sometimes, holding people accountable for their bad policy making decisions
Baitball Blogger
May 2014
#25
my my, one troll fantasizes about killing people and it makes others (who probably boast about being
dionysus
May 2014
#98
This is why I'm a Democrat. We have a party that is not afraid to stand up for the bankers!!
Douglas Carpenter
May 2014
#43
Loved what Elizabeth Warren said about how Geither saw his role in her new book...
flpoljunkie
May 2014
#61
That was a terrible thing for Clinton to say, it is disgusting to pass off the valid outrage and
Jefferson23
May 2014
#48
I wonder whether Clinton has any family or friends who lost their business or their home thanks
JDPriestly
May 2014
#52
Au contraire! His son-in-law has his very own hedge fund & a$10.5 million "flat".
Divernan
May 2014
#89
Reading your comment about "you can never make liberals happy" gave me dejavu
GoneFishin
May 2014
#82
I'm not saying Bill didn't say this, but remember, this is Geithner saying Bill said this...
joeybee12
May 2014
#70
It is NOT an issue of "blood lust"; but an issue of Justice that is paramount.
laserhaas
May 2014
#85