Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why the NRA is more monstrous than you think [View all]hack89
(39,181 posts)25. It is politicians like Ed Markey and S.2068 that are provoking an anti-smart gun backlash
S.2068 calls for grant money, up to $2 million, for companies, individuals, and states, to research technology that would lead to the personalization of firearms. A personalized handgun, according to the bill, is a firearm which: enables only an authorized user of the handgun to fire the handgun; was manufactured in such a manner that the firing restriction described is incorporated into the design of the handgun; is not sold as an accessory; and cannot be readily removed or deactivated.
According to the bill, Beginning on the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, no person may manufacture in the United States a handgun that is not a personalized handgun.
It says later that, Beginning on the date that is 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, no person may distribute in commerce any handgun that is not a personalized handgun or a retrofitted personalized handgun.
The law would essentially make it illegal to make or sell a gun that is not personalized, new or old.
According to the bill, Beginning on the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, no person may manufacture in the United States a handgun that is not a personalized handgun.
It says later that, Beginning on the date that is 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, no person may distribute in commerce any handgun that is not a personalized handgun or a retrofitted personalized handgun.
The law would essentially make it illegal to make or sell a gun that is not personalized, new or old.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/s2068
If the president and other Dem leaders would promise to never pass such legislation then smart guns wouldn't be an issue.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is politicians like Ed Markey and S.2068 that are provoking an anti-smart gun backlash
hack89
May 2014
#25
Just pushing back at the never ending attempts to minimize and smear pro-gun Dems
hack89
May 2014
#45
wow, i heard that same response on another thread...except it was 10 years...nice nra talking point
spanone
May 2014
#96
Correct. The NRA is perfectly happy with our sky-high homicide rates, and does not want us to get
DanTex
May 2014
#19
The fear of being the victims of a culture war is what is driving gun sales...
krispos42
May 2014
#50
Funny, I only see right-wingers talking about "culture war" when it comes to guns.
DanTex
May 2014
#52
Golly---you mean all of this is the gun control side's fault? Imagine my lack of surprise.
Paladin
May 2014
#54
Larry Pratt has nothing to do with the NRA, he has his own rival organization.
951-Riverside
May 2014
#22
I guess, but if I was raped twice and stabbed 17 times I probably would carry like her too.
dilby
May 2014
#56
Sounds like you carry now and haven't had anything like that happen to you. Women have more reason
Hoyt
May 2014
#57
Pretty obvious to me. Why do you assume - now that Dixiecrats have folded - that bigoted gun lovers
Hoyt
May 2014
#62
Context means a lot. Kerry isn't "marching" with a racist or waving a flag symbolic of hatred.
Hoyt
May 2014
#66
I can understand a liberal owning a gun or two; but not toting in public; accumulating, promoting;
Hoyt
May 2014
#76
Nope, thinking one needs a gun in their pants while walking around is right wing IMO.
Hoyt
May 2014
#78
That might be a false perception. Many women own and use firearms for hunting, target shooting ...
spin
May 2014
#87