Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,248 posts)
5. Those that it's important to have known this stat for a long, long time.
Thu May 8, 2014, 08:24 PM
May 2014

It's only new to us. That means it has more importance because it leads to new insights. Because it's new to us, it explains what we perceive as a change. "Sudden interest."

But for others, the insights are old. If this stat entails interest in Boko Haram, then the interest should have been there a long time ago. It would explain a sudden change way back when. It can't explain the sudden change now.

No, some heinous events seize the media's attention and gets thrust into the public's attention zone. The public may pay attention or not. If the public does, then suddenly the media goes into a frenzy. The more salacious, the more horrifying, the more heart-rending the scenario the more attention. Hundreds of girls seized because they were sitting for exams, denied education and their lives, and seized by religious extremists at that--that's enough tear-jerking for a long time. Esp. when it plays into American sensibilities of oppression and aspirations as it does.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nigeria exports more oil ...»Reply #5