Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri May 9, 2014, 10:09 AM May 2014

Obama’s Move On Solar Is Equivalent To A Year Without 80 Million Cars [View all]

Obama’s Move On Solar Is Equivalent To A Year Without 80 Million Cars

By Emily Atkin

President Obama is expected to announce a series of executive actions and agreements on Friday morning that will advance solar power and energy efficiency in the United States, part of his pledge to tackle climate change without having to go through a gridlocked Congress...the initiatives will represent an 850-megawatt increase in solar power deployed, or enough to power 130,000 homes. They will also lead to more $2 billion in energy efficiency investments in Federal buildings, $26 billion in savings for businesses on energy bills, and a 380 million metric ton decrease in carbon pollution — the equivalent of taking about 80 million cars off the road for a year, the statement said.

Here are six key actions detailed in the announcement:

Commitments from 300 business leaders to increase solar power

<...>

Solar and efficiency boosts for low-income housing

The Federal Housing Administration will expand its Green Preservation Plus program, which encourages owners of affordable housing properties to invest in energy efficiency improvements. To do that, the agency’s program offers mortgage loans, with the specific condition that five percent of that loan be used to reduce energy and water consumption at the property. The investment not only increases efficiency, but winds up improving the operating income for the building owner, lowering utility costs for low-income tenants.

<...>

More college training programs for solar workers

<...>

Better streetlights in cities across the country

A program called the High Performance Outdoor Lighting Accelerator will also be announced today, which intends to increase high-efficiency lighting in outdoor spaces across the country. Under the program, the Department of Energy intends to replace more than 500,000 outdoor lighting poles in Detroit, West Palm Beach, and Little Rock, among other charter cities.

New energy conservation regulations for big appliances

<...>

A $2 billion investment in federal building efficiency

The President will also announce a goal to invest $2 billion for energy efficiency upgrades to federal buildings over the next three years. Combined with the $2 billion goal set in 2011, this means a total of $4 billion will given to federal contractors to make the upgrades to the buildings. The investments purport to be able to save billions in energy costs, promote energy independence, and, according to independent estimates, create tens of thousands of jobs in the construction sector.

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/05/09/3436057/obama-solar-push/

Worth nothing:

Huge thermal plant opens as solar industry grows
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024493290

U.S. Approves Two Huge Solar Projects On Public Lands In California
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024547836

DOE: U.S. Wind Energy Production and Manufacturing Reaches Record Highs
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023420471
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wow. Impressive numbers. I hope it's enough. randome May 2014 #1
Kick! n/t ProSense May 2014 #2
Reverse Reagan - Solar Panels Return to WH Roof ProSense May 2014 #3
Reagan was such a tool. Cha May 2014 #13
Reagan came along and struck down the Carter Admins initiative on solar energy. Go figure. YOHABLO May 2014 #20
And yet in Ohio albino65 May 2014 #4
Nope, try Oaklahoma where people who put up Solar cells are PENALIZED! the_working_poor May 2014 #40
Bout died over this one.......could not believe they passed this tax..... a kennedy May 2014 #48
EPA Is On A Winning Streak In Court Battles Over Clean Air ProSense May 2014 #5
I think he was waiting on the rulings to see how far he could go. nt okaawhatever May 2014 #15
Keystone === Dead Deal pbmus May 2014 #6
Excellent. toby jo May 2014 #7
I dig this. byronius May 2014 #8
k&r n/t RainDog May 2014 #9
There are one billion cars on the road. rug May 2014 #10
There are ProSense May 2014 #11
When it comes to carbon emission you can't credibly talk about national borders. rug May 2014 #12
When ProSense May 2014 #16
That's .08% and the headline uses car equivalents. rug May 2014 #17
Yes, 80 million is 8 percent of the world's cars ProSense May 2014 #18
First, here's a blue link. rug May 2014 #19
Are you ProSense May 2014 #21
Math doesn't lie and bad math makes bad politics. rug May 2014 #28
"Bad math" does lie, and it also doesn't make for good comments. LOL! ProSense May 2014 #30
The OP doesn't upset me. It's a good, but small step. rug May 2014 #31
"What irks me is the urge to push it for more than what it is." ProSense May 2014 #32
I doublechecked; it is 8%. Whether the program equals 80 million cars remains to be seen. rug May 2014 #33
What ProSense May 2014 #35
Here's the bottom line--this is GOOD NEWS, and you appear intent on crapping on the thread. MADem May 2014 #42
You can take ir any way you want. Things are not good/bad. rug May 2014 #43
Yes, I sure can, and I've told you how I have taken it. You're crapping on the thread. MADem May 2014 #44
Oh I think the thread will survive some nuance. rug May 2014 #46
Well, what you're doing isn't nuance, unless you're "taking a big nuance" all over the thread. nt MADem May 2014 #47
If 80,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 are correct figures IDemo May 2014 #24
I don't know about the 80,000,000 but here's the source for one billion. rug May 2014 #29
I'm not doubting the one billion figure IDemo May 2014 #34
Since the US does not control energy policy for the entire planet, riqster May 2014 #37
Doin' my part by not driving a car. :) Thanks Obama Cha May 2014 #14
The math works. ProSense May 2014 #22
the well-travelled-path yields little. quadrature May 2014 #23
Those things you mention all put carbon into the air. DireStrike May 2014 #25
But EV's use less carbon energy per mile than equivalent sized internal combustion vehicles IDemo May 2014 #27
How can ProSense May 2014 #26
Solar PV. progress is painfully slow... quadrature May 2014 #36
No, it doesn't. This is an example of the misapplication of a saying--what yields little is the MADem May 2014 #45
Best reason to vote straight Democratic ticket in 6 months ffr May 2014 #38
So will you feel this way when Keystone is given thumbs up ... pbmus May 2014 #39
Yes. Yes. Certainly. Absolutely. ffr May 2014 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama’s Move On Solar Is ...