Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
62. Pretty obvious to me. Why do you assume - now that Dixiecrats have folded - that bigoted gun lovers
Fri May 9, 2014, 01:44 PM
May 2014

who are into intimidation, etc., would truly vote for a real Democratic candidate?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'll tell you why Travis_0004 May 2014 #1
I agree, still no reason to insult and threaten the inventor. nt Logical May 2014 #3
+1 nomorenomore08 May 2014 #9
Why not let people who want to buy them, buy them? Crunchy Frog May 2014 #15
It is pretty ironic, isn't it Electric Monk May 2014 #17
"That one we infringed." ROFL! ( n/t ) Make7 May 2014 #20
It is politicians like Ed Markey and S.2068 that are provoking an anti-smart gun backlash hack89 May 2014 #25
That reminds me, I need to make a donation to Markey XRubicon May 2014 #33
Have you also sent money to Bloomberg? Nt hack89 May 2014 #35
No he doesn't need money. XRubicon May 2014 #36
Besides, Bloomberg intends to go after incumbent Dems. Nt hack89 May 2014 #37
I'm sure that will make your side smile XRubicon May 2014 #38
Why? I support Dems pro- gun or not hack89 May 2014 #40
If there is no threat from the Democratic party then why do you react like XRubicon May 2014 #44
Just pushing back at the never ending attempts to minimize and smear pro-gun Dems hack89 May 2014 #45
When did the police officer bull shit upaloopa May 2014 #27
If, and I did say if, smart guns are mandated by law hack89 May 2014 #42
wow, i heard that same response on another thread...except it was 10 years...nice nra talking point spanone May 2014 #96
Larry Pratt is not NRA; he has his own group Gun Owners of America aikoaiko May 2014 #2
LOL, that is really scary. nt Logical May 2014 #4
I'd say more than a notch... sarisataka May 2014 #12
Wow, thanks for the info! nt Logical May 2014 #14
Gun Owners of America make the NRA look liberal. .... spin May 2014 #34
Good points.....I hate the NRA and they are mostly GOP idiots..... Logical May 2014 #43
I know some of their instructors and they are excellent. (n/t) spin May 2014 #46
To address your point... aikoaiko May 2014 #5
No proof it is because of more people carrying guns. But it is proof.... Logical May 2014 #6
I should have been more clear because I agree with you. aikoaiko May 2014 #7
Very true. nt Logical May 2014 #13
You pretty much hit the nail square on the head rustydog May 2014 #8
I disagree strongly. linuxman May 2014 #10
Not a fan of the NRA Crepuscular May 2014 #11
By your standard the NRA is a colossal failure hack89 May 2014 #16
Oh, lord... krispos42 May 2014 #18
Suppose the bad guys had smart guns also upaloopa May 2014 #28
Culture warriors seem to savor the possibility of violence. Eleanors38 May 2014 #48
Correct. The NRA is perfectly happy with our sky-high homicide rates, and does not want us to get DanTex May 2014 #19
Our homicade rate is at a 4 decade low. Travis_0004 May 2014 #23
We are about 3-4 times higher than other advanced democracies. DanTex May 2014 #26
How low might it go without a bunch of yahoos promoting guns and impeding Hoyt May 2014 #29
Ah, Dan. Do you always see RW GOPers... Eleanors38 May 2014 #49
I see RWers where there are RWers. DanTex May 2014 #51
What "RW positions" do you support? Eleanors38 May 2014 #60
The fear of being the victims of a culture war is what is driving gun sales... krispos42 May 2014 #50
Funny, I only see right-wingers talking about "culture war" when it comes to guns. DanTex May 2014 #52
Oh, so it was some other Hillary Clinton that spoke four days ago? krispos42 May 2014 #95
Hmm, doesn't seem to be anything about a "culture war". DanTex May 2014 #97
Golly---you mean all of this is the gun control side's fault? Imagine my lack of surprise. Paladin May 2014 #54
Don't you mean "our record low homicide rates make the NRA sad"? (nt) Recursion May 2014 #91
Again with the "slavery means Jim Crow is great" argument. DanTex May 2014 #94
I would never want to own one for self defense oneofthe99 May 2014 #21
Larry Pratt has nothing to do with the NRA, he has his own rival organization. 951-Riverside May 2014 #22
My biggest issue with the smart gun is it destroys concealed carry. dilby May 2014 #24
It's really not that difficult to spot most yahoos that tote and are Hoyt May 2014 #30
Actually you would be surprised. dilby May 2014 #31
Most women toters are not as callous, bigoted and into guns as men. Hoyt May 2014 #32
I guess, but if I was raped twice and stabbed 17 times I probably would carry like her too. dilby May 2014 #56
Sounds like you carry now and haven't had anything like that happen to you. Women have more reason Hoyt May 2014 #57
Actually I don't carry at all, never felt the need for it. dilby May 2014 #59
Why do you assume none of these men vote Democrat oneofthe99 May 2014 #61
Pretty obvious to me. Why do you assume - now that Dixiecrats have folded - that bigoted gun lovers Hoyt May 2014 #62
I can't just look at a person and know how he votes oneofthe99 May 2014 #64
Context means a lot. Kerry isn't "marching" with a racist or waving a flag symbolic of hatred. Hoyt May 2014 #66
You like to judge books by their cover , I don't live my life like that. oneofthe99 May 2014 #70
A pistol on a hip is a dead give away in vast majority of cases. Hoyt May 2014 #71
Come on, get real. (nt) Paladin May 2014 #63
Democrats also hunt and wear camo oneofthe99 May 2014 #65
Again, shooting game is different from preparing to shoot people. Hoyt May 2014 #67
project much? SQUEE May 2014 #72
I hunted for years. I know what honest-to-God hunters look like. Paladin May 2014 #69
+1000000 Hoyt May 2014 #73
Why would the pro-hunting side of DU savage Kerry? NutmegYankee May 2014 #75
There's a huge difference between "pro-hunting" and "pro-gun." Paladin May 2014 #81
There are a lot of distinctions that have to be made. NutmegYankee May 2014 #82
Take a look at the second photo under post 57. Paladin May 2014 #84
No, I'm definitely not part of that crowd. NutmegYankee May 2014 #86
I call BS on another Hoyt Super Power.I'll be in Georgia soon, SQUEE May 2014 #58
He doesn't believe liberal gun owners exist. NutmegYankee May 2014 #74
I can understand a liberal owning a gun or two; but not toting in public; accumulating, promoting; Hoyt May 2014 #76
LOL! Cognitive Dissonance NutmegYankee May 2014 #77
Nope, thinking one needs a gun in their pants while walking around is right wing IMO. Hoyt May 2014 #78
Gun ownership does not equal walking around with a gun in the pants. NutmegYankee May 2014 #79
Then, it doesn't sound like you are a Zimmerman type. Many are, however. Hoyt May 2014 #80
Go ahead and make them. MicaelS May 2014 #39
Sounds so frightening. I guess the Bundy Ranch militia is right. Hoyt May 2014 #41
Diversify your hate: Pratt heads the GOA... Eleanors38 May 2014 #47
I don't think the NRA is the problem. Laelth May 2014 #53
That might be a false perception. Many women own and use firearms for hunting, target shooting ... spin May 2014 #87
Kick! Heidi May 2014 #55
How smart? Calista241 May 2014 #68
I'm a gun owner and strong supporter of the Second Amendment. ... spin May 2014 #83
All of the hate was sparked by New Jersey acting stupidly. NutmegYankee May 2014 #85
The solution to those who live in states like New Jersey is to vote out politicians who ... spin May 2014 #89
Fixing a clumsy piece of legislation is a much better alternative..... Paladin May 2014 #90
We get lost in the fighting bewteen the extremes on both sides. NutmegYankee May 2014 #92
Agreed. (nt) Paladin May 2014 #93
and their only solution is “buy more guns so you can shoot back at the people and situations MisterP May 2014 #88
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why the NRA is more monst...»Reply #62