Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: pornography and erotica [View all]rrneck
(17,671 posts)27. Photographic realism is not that important.
It seems so now because it's so pervasive. It's how we're used to seeing images. Isometric projection can be just as erotic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"The minute we come up with an art canon some wise ass will drive through it with a Mack truck."
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#62
Erotica leaves a space for the viewer's imagination. Think the shower scene in Psycho-
KittyWampus
May 2014
#7
Ah, you mean like Shunga & Kama Sutra? But they are not photographically realistic.
KittyWampus
May 2014
#22
Kind of like the old joke about the difference between a Faith, Sect, or Cult...
petronius
May 2014
#33
Every person has to decide for him/herself. Needless to say, I'm not in favor of any censorship. n/t
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#72