General Discussion

longship

(40,416 posts)

19. Isn't that the mapping of the tsunami?

Fri May 9, 2014, 10:09 PM

May 2014

Yup! Looks like it. It was recycled by Fukushima nuke doomers as a radiation map. Some even were DUers.

Their agenda was more important than being honest. And so it goes.

I don't like nuclear power any more than anybody, but what purpose is there to lying about it, or making shit up? What does that gain?

Meanwhile science just does their work and thankfully the Pacific Ocean is very large. Fukushima Daiichi is a terrible disaster. But it is being managed, may be not perfectly, but as some have wisely pointed out, the Japanese don't want it any more than anybody. They are taking care of it. And yes, it's going to take years.

This study is what many of us have been saying for some time. I am sure there are some here with their hair still on fire. Sadly, that's for the Japanese. Fortunately, not us. But many of us already knew that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

145 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No Worries: Fukushima Radiation Didn't Make it to L.A. Beaches [View all] zappaman May 2014 OP

But the starfish! NuclearDem May 2014 #1

The OP is false RobertEarl May 2014 #5

Do you have a link? maddezmom May 2014 #7

Several links RobertEarl May 2014 #15

your article said "minute traces" dionysus May 2014 #24

In other words, a global catastrophe. NuclearDem May 2014 #27

Yep. Minute RobertEarl May 2014 #28

Please provide the peer reviewed studies, not the nuttiness of the site you provided. eom MohRokTah May 2014 #31

Don't bother. Citing ENENews is the equivalent of "I've got nothing." NuclearDem May 2014 #33

It sort of explains alot doesn't it? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #52

Enenews is a great source RobertEarl May 2014 #34

ROTFLMAO FreakinDJ May 2014 #81

Bwhahahahahahahaha zappaman May 2014 #85

... SidDithers May 2014 #98

You are aware in this case "minute" means "substantially less than background radiation", right? Chan790 May 2014 #126

Eat your banana and smile, right? RobertEarl May 2014 #127

Have you started the speaking gigs yet? You can get paid for "spreading" this information! snooper2 May 2014 #141

. MohRokTah May 2014 #8

Nope, try again. Radiation still isn't killing the starfish. NuclearDem May 2014 #10

But... greytdemocrat May 2014 #14

LOL, real funny itsrobert May 2014 #131

uh huh zappaman May 2014 #13

And the NOAA map. NuclearDem May 2014 #16

300 tons of radioactive water has to end up somewhere, and in truedelphi May 2014 #18

That's 300 tons a day RobertEarl May 2014 #20

My that number seems scary! NuclearDem May 2014 #21

Math has a demonstrated pro-nuke bias. MohRokTah May 2014 #25

Ocean science is your next lesson, eh? RobertEarl May 2014 #29

Dude, you are using propaganda, not science. MohRokTah May 2014 #30

Eh? RobertEarl May 2014 #35

I have yet to see a single bit of solid science posted by you. eom MohRokTah May 2014 #37

That must mean you can't read RobertEarl May 2014 #39

Oh I can read. MohRokTah May 2014 #40

No paranoia here RobertEarl May 2014 #41

Where is the dilution factor in everything you are saying? MohRokTah May 2014 #43

So, no answers to simple questions? RobertEarl May 2014 #50

Anti-science? NuclearDem May 2014 #44

Thanks for putting up a good fight. truedelphi May 2014 #124

It's worth the effort RobertEarl May 2014 #125

It's been shown in models that the concentration of radioactive material is 2 to 27 becquerels... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #122

Isn't that the mapping of the tsunami? longship May 2014 #19

All it "gains" is the general public lumping rational nuclear skeptics in with the loons. NuclearDem May 2014 #22

Your hypothesis may still be operative. longship May 2014 #32

Fun? RobertEarl May 2014 #38

Well, might as well just have some fun with it. NuclearDem May 2014 #42

I despise nuclear energy. longship May 2014 #45

You are the only one making stuff up RobertEarl May 2014 #47

Actually, you were banned from E&E largely because you were making shit up and spamming it. NuclearDem May 2014 #48

You should not tell lies like that RobertEarl May 2014 #56

Trust me, I read through those threads in E&E NuclearDem May 2014 #59

That's not true RobertEarl May 2014 #62

Umm... dude pintobean May 2014 #90

I love you guys following me!! RobertEarl May 2014 #91

Umm... dude pintobean May 2014 #92

Bwahahaha NuclearDem May 2014 #93

Well, I pretty much owned this thread. RobertEarl May 2014 #94

You have an odd definition of owned. NuclearDem May 2014 #95

owned pintobean May 2014 #100

You pretty much owned this thread? pintobean May 2014 #97

Actually, I stole it RobertEarl May 2014 #101

No, but you certainly are WAY more amusing! zappaman May 2014 #103

You certainly have owned this thread zappaman May 2014 #99

LOL! maddezmom May 2014 #110

Sorry, my friend. longship May 2014 #49

Going? RobertEarl May 2014 #53

If you call bleeding out a patient management Generic Other May 2014 #138

Fukushima is a non-issue. Propoganda, conspiracy and tinfoil abound. JJChambers May 2014 #130

and and and time traveling radiation affecting them, too! ;) n/t X_Digger May 2014 #115

Go ahead and laugh Orrex May 2014 #137

And who says the Big Nuke industry doesn't have the ability to slant truedelphi May 2014 #2

I guess they paid off the scientists zappaman May 2014 #3

Unless you actually travel to see the scientists and talk to them, you don't have any truedelphi May 2014 #17

Isn't it funny how the only cooked books and bogus studies tend to be on the other side? NuclearDem May 2014 #11

Nobody would be so stupid as to claim sea star wasting was from Fukushima! longship May 2014 #80

The pacific has been radiated for a long time RobertEarl May 2014 #84

Damnit, I put those marshmallows out for nothing mindwalker_i May 2014 #4

Tinfoil keeps the Fukishima radiation out. MohRokTah May 2014 #6

This is great. PumpkinAle May 2014 #9

At least you'll roast evenly and come out juicy and tender. herding cats May 2014 #12

a real investigative journalist would cut you down to size... dionysus May 2014 #23

Keep breathing that WTC dust, all is fine. Nothing to worry about. Everything is gonna be fine 951-Riverside May 2014 #26

Non-sequitur. longship May 2014 #36

The science says RobertEarl May 2014 #46

The sea star crap was science illiteracy. longship May 2014 #51

Read this RobertEarl May 2014 #54

Oh my good God, why are you citing the welcome page like it means anything? NuclearDem May 2014 #57

From the site: OurRadioactiveOcean? longship May 2014 #61

Well, it actually is a WHOI project. NuclearDem May 2014 #64

I am on an iPhone here. longship May 2014 #69

Good Gawd RobertEarl May 2014 #65

Personal again? longship May 2014 #71

Go to bed RobertEarl May 2014 #73

Bye Robert. Pshaw! longship May 2014 #77

At least he is prepared! zappaman May 2014 #89

You know, that site wouldn't load on my iPhone. NuclearDem May 2014 #79

Why do you work so hard to tell us not to worry or believe? FreedRadical May 2014 #55

Of course, there is risk. longship May 2014 #58

What is killing the sea stars? RobertEarl May 2014 #60

Please do not make this personal. longship May 2014 #67

Don't make it personal? RobertEarl May 2014 #70

Of course radiation has been ruled out. longship May 2014 #76

Radiation has not been ruled out RobertEarl May 2014 #83

Sea stars are dying in the Atlantic as well NickB79 May 2014 #134

1990's you say? RobertEarl May 2014 #135

Oh now that I'm going to need evidence of. NuclearDem May 2014 #136

Here ya go, all sourced with further links RobertEarl May 2014 #145

"Did you know the east coast of the US did get its fair share of Fuku-plume?" zappaman May 2014 #139

Evidence of airborne depositions RobertEarl May 2014 #140

I think this poster handles it quite nicely zappaman May 2014 #142

Chernobyl's fallout blew from east to west NickB79 May 2014 #144

Well we know what it isn't.. radiation from Fukushima. Unless it's time traveling radiation. X_Digger May 2014 #116

That's dumb RobertEarl May 2014 #117

Radiation from Fukushima certainly can be discounted. Unless it can travel backwards in time. X_Digger May 2014 #118

Prove it. RobertEarl May 2014 #120

1) You don't prove negatives. NuclearDem May 2014 #121

You have been saying the science is bad, FreedRadical May 2014 #63

Because there are people who have spent most of their lives studying oceanography or radiation NuclearDem May 2014 #66

It's NOT safe. FreedRadical May 2014 #72

Uh. Huh. NuclearDem May 2014 #75

Cool. FreedRadical May 2014 #78

Longship is way out there RobertEarl May 2014 #68

I want to ask you RobertEarl, why are you fighting so hard too. FreedRadical May 2014 #74

Why fight? RobertEarl May 2014 #82

Thanks. FreedRadical May 2014 #86

Nuke industry is known for lies RobertEarl May 2014 #87

Radioactive cesium-137 released from Fukushima 1.5 times Tepco estimate: study 951-Riverside May 2014 #107

Have fun! WinkyDink May 2014 #88

What am I going to do with all this iodine... SidDithers May 2014 #96

Sounds like you could be on DOOMSDAY PREPPERS! zappaman May 2014 #102

Oh wow. That's awesome... SidDithers May 2014 #104

Just so you know RobertEarl May 2014 #105

People post about Louie Gohmert all the time but I wouldn't call him their idol. hobbit709 May 2014 #108

Louie Gohmert is awesome! zappaman May 2014 #111

Yes, and Fracking isn't causing earthquakes in Oklahoma dem in texas May 2014 #106

Pretty sure that's a completly different subject. zappaman May 2014 #112

That's bullshit, zappaman pintobean May 2014 #113

Cans are in these days. zappaman May 2014 #114

I've got one too ! "Unemployment is less than 7%" NM_Birder May 2014 #143

The radiation just disappeared! It's magic! meanit May 2014 #109

If it's real, why CAN'T YOU SEE IT?! Huh? HUH? closeupready May 2014 #119

Oil is a viscous, sticky, hydrophobic material... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #123

This strikes me as a NIMBY post... chervilant May 2014 #128

It actually is in my back yard zappaman May 2014 #129

You're in Japan? chervilant May 2014 #132

Los Angeles zappaman May 2014 #133