Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The REAL ASSHOLES are the traitors who lied America into war and still walk free. [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)145. The players were connected in a way not apparent to observers on the ground.
At root-level.
Last Plamegate Worry for Bush-Cheney
Its a well-worn talking point for George W. Bushs supporters to say there was no underlying crime beneath former White House aide I. Lewis Libbys conviction for obstructing justice, a debatable point itself. But the evidence is clear there was a larger cover-up conspiracy and it could still unravel.
By Robert Parry
ConsortiumNews, June 6, 2007
Signaling the Conspirators
Beyond the Plame leak itself, a strong case could be made that the President and Vice President sought to mislead federal investigators and the public. On Sept. 30, 2003, Bush declared that anyone who knew anything about the leak should speak up, even as he was concealing the fact that he had authorized parts of the anti-Wilson campaign.
If there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is, Bush said. I want to know the truth. If anybody has got any information inside our administration or outside our administration, it would be helpful if they came forward with the information so we can find out whether or not these allegations are true.
Since Bush himself was withholding key information, Bushs statement could be read as a signal to subordinates to hang tough and deny knowledge, anticipating that the inquiry then under the control of Attorney General John Ashcroft would peter out.
In early October, Cheney wrote a memo to the White House press office demanding that a statement be issued clearing Libby of a role in the Plame leak as had already been done for other White House officials, such as Bushs political adviser Karl Rove.
Not going to protect one staffer + sacrifice the guy the Pres that was asked to stick his head in the meat grinder because of incompetence of others, Cheney wrote. In the memo, the Vice President initially ascribed Libbys sacrifice to Bush but then crossed out the Pres and put the clause in a passive tense.
On Oct. 4, 2003, pursuant to Cheneys memo, White House press secretary Scott McClellan added Libby to the list of officials who have assured me that they were not involved in this.
There was also a larger context to the cover-up. In fall 2003, the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress and the Washington press corps had been easily deceived about the Iraq invasion. So, the administration had reason to be confident that the cover-up would hold as long as the Justice Department played ball.
But Attorney General Ashcroft threw the White House a curve when he recused himself and let Deputy Attorney General James Comey pick a special prosecutor outside the administrations direct control. Comey chose Chicago U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald, known as a no-nonsense prosecutor with a record of pursuing public corruption cases.
Suddenly, Libby and other senior officials were facing sterner FBI questioning. Still, instead of admitting a role in leaking Plames identity, Libby stuck to his denials, concocting a story that he had learned about Plames CIA work from NBCs Tim Russert.
Libby apparently still hoped that his allies in the mainstream news media, particularly New York Times reporter Judy Miller, would shield him from the truth. Indeed, Miller went to jail for 85 days instead of divulging what her source, Libby, had revealed about Plames identity.
Under pressure in 2005, however, Libby released Miller from her pledge of confidentiality but phrased his letter in a way that suggested she should stick with the team.
Out West, where you vacation, the aspens will already be turning, Libby wrote. They turn in clusters, because their roots connect them.
But Libbys bid failed. With testimony from Miller and others, Fitzgerald built an ironclad case that Libby had lied to investigators and obstructed justice.
CONTINUED...
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2007/060607.html
The late Lawrence Walsh used to describe Iran-Contra treason he investigated as special prosecutor also fit in the lies running up to Iraq War 2: FIREWALL.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
167 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The REAL ASSHOLES are the traitors who lied America into war and still walk free. [View all]
Octafish
May 2014
OP
Didn't Hillary support the Iraq War? Kudos to Greewald for uncovering the lies based on
sabrina 1
May 2014
#112
I know enough to reflexively recoil at anything associated with Wall Street.
NuclearDem
May 2014
#21
Oh you are just trying to confuse the issue. "Hate Greenwald, hate Greenwald."
rhett o rick
May 2014
#28
Maybe taking his tweet out of context, misinterpreting it, and using it as a tool for hate and
rhett o rick
May 2014
#19
It wasnt an asshole move if you understand what he was saying. But hatred can cloud judgement. nm
rhett o rick
May 2014
#31
I think there is a fear of becoming irrelevant. They are like Neville Chamberlain.
rhett o rick
May 2014
#62
The problem is that there are those that refuse to support anyone that speaks out to
rhett o rick
May 2014
#37
I think you are referring to "They Thought They Were Free" by Milton Mayer. nm
rhett o rick
May 2014
#63
I am interested. I see Amazon* sells used copies. Current working my way thru Michael Ruppert's,
rhett o rick
May 2014
#84
Thank you for spelling it out so well, Dragonfli: The government has become most un-democratic.
Octafish
May 2014
#41
I remember when this site used to oppose war for money. I also had the pleasure
Dragonfli
May 2014
#83
"I no longer consider this a progressive site, as most of the newbies are anything but"
carolinayellowdog
May 2014
#126
Our oligarch overlords would love us to fight about Greenwald instead of addressing the bigger
rhett o rick
May 2014
#20
The point of the OP is that in the scope of things, if he is an asshole, he is way down
rhett o rick
May 2014
#34
Ah yes of course. It's so very important to keep the spotlight on him and away from other issues
rhett o rick
May 2014
#54
No No we have to focus on Bengazi stupid.. that's what the Repugs want the focus on, right?
YOHABLO
May 2014
#99
Good point. The Repugs want us to focus on Bengazi while the Blue Dogs want us to focus
rhett o rick
May 2014
#137
Are you the Owner of this Site..? What gives YOU the right to decide what gets posted
KoKo
May 2014
#97
If lies were not being told about Greenwald there would still be Greenwald threads on Democratic
sabrina 1
May 2014
#114
I dont think the Greenwald haters recognize that they are not liberals. Just sayin.
rhett o rick
May 2014
#152
Could be. Maybe there needs to be a declaration from the Dem Party as to who actually
sabrina 1
May 2014
#153
It's weird to see DUers cutting down the cornerstone of Democracy - the Free Press.
Octafish
May 2014
#61
"It's weird to see DUers cutting down the cornerstone of Democracy - the Free Press."
malokvale77
May 2014
#115
I was told the other day on DU that I have been misinterpreting the 4th Amendment, and I presume
sabrina 1
May 2014
#154
I wish that those c/o Greenwald were as upset at what he and Snowden exposed.
Dustlawyer
May 2014
#43
It could lead one to believe that they actually approve of those, which is why they focus on GG & ES
Electric Monk
May 2014
#67
Believe It Or Not Jimmy Carter Is The Most Threatened Ex-President in US History
Octafish
May 2014
#156
The bill to bail out the banks was passed by a Democratic majority after Obama ...
slipslidingaway
May 2014
#124
Is ASSHOLE some euphemism for CRIMINAL? Just asking. The language seems a bit soft to me.
ancianita
May 2014
#128
I think Blankfein said that you can't prosecute stupidity, in so many words. Proving intent is THE
ancianita
May 2014
#130
Huh. I was raised on "Ignorance is no defense" and for the "unwashed masses" that is true...
Pholus
May 2014
#132
Several DUers routinely apply it to journalists and whistleblowers, rather than to criminals.
Octafish
May 2014
#155
Amazing that we need this review of real criminal history, but we do, Octafish...
MrMickeysMom
May 2014
#161
the REAL ASSHOLES are the torturers. those who put torture into american's mainstream
spanone
May 2014
#157