Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Since it's all the rage to complain about what people post (Greenwald) [View all]Maedhros
(10,007 posts)23. By your command:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/02/14/944478/-HB-Gary-Federal-CEO-a-Daily-Kos-Member
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/02/16/945768/-UPDATED-The-HB-Gary-Email-That-Should-Concern-Us-All
The US military is developing software that will let it secretly manipulate social media sites by using fake online personas to influence internet conversations and spread pro-American propaganda.
A Californian corporation has been awarded a contract with United States Central Command (Centcom), which oversees US armed operations in the Middle East and Central Asia, to develop what is described as an "online persona management service" that will allow one US serviceman or woman to control up to 10 separate identities based all over the world.
The project has been likened by web experts to China's attempts to control and restrict free speech on the internet. Critics are likely to complain that it will allow the US military to create a false consensus in online conversations, crowd out unwelcome opinions and smother commentaries or reports that do not correspond with its own objectives.
A Californian corporation has been awarded a contract with United States Central Command (Centcom), which oversees US armed operations in the Middle East and Central Asia, to develop what is described as an "online persona management service" that will allow one US serviceman or woman to control up to 10 separate identities based all over the world.
The project has been likened by web experts to China's attempts to control and restrict free speech on the internet. Critics are likely to complain that it will allow the US military to create a false consensus in online conversations, crowd out unwelcome opinions and smother commentaries or reports that do not correspond with its own objectives.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/02/14/944478/-HB-Gary-Federal-CEO-a-Daily-Kos-Member
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/02/16/945768/-UPDATED-The-HB-Gary-Email-That-Should-Concern-Us-All
According to an embedded MS Word document found in one of the HBGary emails, it involves creating an army of sockpuppets, with sophisticated "persona management" software that allows a small team of only a few people to appear to be many, while keeping the personas from accidentally cross-contaminating each other. Then, to top it off, the team can actually automate some functions so one persona can appear to be an entire Brooks Brothers riot online.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Since it's all the rage to complain about what people post (Greenwald) [View all]
BainsBane
May 2014
OP
it's all like cheering your team (even when they suck) at a sporting event, isn't it?
bettyellen
May 2014
#1
"Information they made public": 1 FISA warrant, some random powerpoint presentations
ucrdem
May 2014
#2
Oh, right. It was the Guardian's Personals section that must have won.
DisgustipatedinCA
May 2014
#14
The guardian won because of articles written by Greenwald with Smowden as his source
Luminous Animal
May 2014
#29
The truth would be good, put the real facts about surveillance, what it is and what it isn't.
Thinkingabout
May 2014
#3
It doesn't. It's just a distraction from the real issues concerning the NSA and private
myrna minx
May 2014
#19
It's like blaming the 911 caller for the fire he reported rather than going after the arsonists.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#34
Simple answer: It impacts it just the same as which pundit is discussing Benghazi
stevenleser
May 2014
#36