General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'd rather have my hair on fire than my head in the sand, when it comes to Corporate Power [View all]JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Clearly you love this country way more than I do.
What I find as a common element in these outrage discussions is that the outraged rarely have any ideas on how to move forward. Unless complaining is a path forward.
Take Net Neutrality. The administration had made one proposal. That failed in court. So they made another proposal that has elements we don't like.
First question ... if the administration hates us, why did they make the original proposal? Must have been a trick, I guess. They wanted that to fail. So they could make the 2nd proposal and screw us. IS that it?
And what's your proposal? What should they be proposing given that court ruling?
DU tends to be relatively mute on that point.
A constructive and meaningful use of outrage would be to try and figure out what to do next, and find policy makers to take it forward. Gnashing of teeth isn't a strategy.
But rarely will we see proposals in these threads. The discussion starts and ends with the over the top outrage.
Because in many cases, outrage is really the only point being made.