Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow. Impressive numbers. I hope it's enough. randome May 2014 #1
Kick! n/t ProSense May 2014 #2
Reverse Reagan - Solar Panels Return to WH Roof ProSense May 2014 #3
Reagan was such a tool. Cha May 2014 #13
Reagan came along and struck down the Carter Admins initiative on solar energy. Go figure. YOHABLO May 2014 #20
And yet in Ohio albino65 May 2014 #4
Nope, try Oaklahoma where people who put up Solar cells are PENALIZED! the_working_poor May 2014 #40
Bout died over this one.......could not believe they passed this tax..... a kennedy May 2014 #48
EPA Is On A Winning Streak In Court Battles Over Clean Air ProSense May 2014 #5
I think he was waiting on the rulings to see how far he could go. nt okaawhatever May 2014 #15
Keystone === Dead Deal pbmus May 2014 #6
Excellent. toby jo May 2014 #7
I dig this. byronius May 2014 #8
k&r n/t RainDog May 2014 #9
There are one billion cars on the road. rug May 2014 #10
There are ProSense May 2014 #11
When it comes to carbon emission you can't credibly talk about national borders. rug May 2014 #12
When ProSense May 2014 #16
That's .08% and the headline uses car equivalents. rug May 2014 #17
Yes, 80 million is 8 percent of the world's cars ProSense May 2014 #18
First, here's a blue link. rug May 2014 #19
Are you ProSense May 2014 #21
Math doesn't lie and bad math makes bad politics. rug May 2014 #28
"Bad math" does lie, and it also doesn't make for good comments. LOL! ProSense May 2014 #30
The OP doesn't upset me. It's a good, but small step. rug May 2014 #31
"What irks me is the urge to push it for more than what it is." ProSense May 2014 #32
I doublechecked; it is 8%. Whether the program equals 80 million cars remains to be seen. rug May 2014 #33
What ProSense May 2014 #35
Here's the bottom line--this is GOOD NEWS, and you appear intent on crapping on the thread. MADem May 2014 #42
You can take ir any way you want. Things are not good/bad. rug May 2014 #43
Yes, I sure can, and I've told you how I have taken it. You're crapping on the thread. MADem May 2014 #44
Oh I think the thread will survive some nuance. rug May 2014 #46
Well, what you're doing isn't nuance, unless you're "taking a big nuance" all over the thread. nt MADem May 2014 #47
If 80,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 are correct figures IDemo May 2014 #24
I don't know about the 80,000,000 but here's the source for one billion. rug May 2014 #29
I'm not doubting the one billion figure IDemo May 2014 #34
Since the US does not control energy policy for the entire planet, riqster May 2014 #37
Doin' my part by not driving a car. :) Thanks Obama Cha May 2014 #14
The math works. ProSense May 2014 #22
the well-travelled-path yields little. quadrature May 2014 #23
Those things you mention all put carbon into the air. DireStrike May 2014 #25
But EV's use less carbon energy per mile than equivalent sized internal combustion vehicles IDemo May 2014 #27
How can ProSense May 2014 #26
Solar PV. progress is painfully slow... quadrature May 2014 #36
No, it doesn't. This is an example of the misapplication of a saying--what yields little is the MADem May 2014 #45
Best reason to vote straight Democratic ticket in 6 months ffr May 2014 #38
So will you feel this way when Keystone is given thumbs up ... pbmus May 2014 #39
Yes. Yes. Certainly. Absolutely. ffr May 2014 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama’s Move On Solar Is ...»Reply #8