Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama’s Move On Solar Is Equivalent To A Year Without 80 Million Cars [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)18. Yes, 80 million is 8 percent of the world's cars
"That's .08% and the headline uses car equivalents."
Do you think writing it that way makes it less?
"And the solution is not national, it's global. But, if you're talking about U'S. policy, the Administration can directly link trade agreements to pollution standards. I hope it does a better job with that than with labor standards."
What the hell does that have to do with the OP, which is about U.S. policy?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama’s Move On Solar Is Equivalent To A Year Without 80 Million Cars [View all]
ProSense
May 2014
OP
Reagan came along and struck down the Carter Admins initiative on solar energy. Go figure.
YOHABLO
May 2014
#20
Nope, try Oaklahoma where people who put up Solar cells are PENALIZED!
the_working_poor
May 2014
#40
I doublechecked; it is 8%. Whether the program equals 80 million cars remains to be seen.
rug
May 2014
#33
Here's the bottom line--this is GOOD NEWS, and you appear intent on crapping on the thread.
MADem
May 2014
#42
Yes, I sure can, and I've told you how I have taken it. You're crapping on the thread.
MADem
May 2014
#44
Well, what you're doing isn't nuance, unless you're "taking a big nuance" all over the thread. nt
MADem
May 2014
#47
But EV's use less carbon energy per mile than equivalent sized internal combustion vehicles
IDemo
May 2014
#27