Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

polly7

(20,582 posts)
23. Of course it does.
Sun May 11, 2014, 10:43 PM
May 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024613019

April 11, 2011 – A Kiev Post article entitled “Ukraine Hopes to Get $1.5 Billion from IMF in June” states that the loan is dependent on pension cuts while “maintaining cooperation with the IMF, since it influences the country’s interaction with other international financial institutions and private investors” and further that the “attraction of $850 million from the World Bank in 2011, depended on cooperation with the IMF.” Well, that about says it all – if Ukraine played ball. then the loan money would pour in.

November 21, 2013 – fast forward to the EU summit in Lithuania when President Yanuyovch embarrassed the European Union by rejecting its Agreement in favor of joining Russia’s Common Union with other Commonwealth Independent States.

November 27, 2013 – it was not until February 23, 2014 when Anonymous Ukraine hackers released a series of emails from a Lithuanian government advisor to opposition leader and former boxer Vitaly Klitschko regarding plans to destabilize Ukraine; for example:

“Our American friends promise to pay a visit in the coming days, we may even see Nuland or someone from the Congress.” 12/7/2013




The Anti-Empire Report #128
By William Blum – Published May 9th, 2014

Excerpts: In February of this year, US State Department officials, undiplomatically, joined anti-government protesters in the capital city of Kiev, handing out encouragement and food, from which emanated the infamous leaked audio tape between the US ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, and the State Department’s Victoria Nuland, former US ambassador to NATO and former State Department spokesperson for Hillary Clinton. Their conversation dealt with who should be running the new Ukraine government after the government of Viktor Yanukovich was overthrown; their most favored for this position being one Arseniy Yatsenuk.

My dear, and recently departed, Washington friend, John Judge, liked to say that if you want to call him a “conspiracy theorist” you have to call others *“coincidence theorists”. Thus it was by the most remarkable of coincidences that Arseniy Yatsenuk did indeed become the new prime minister. He could very soon be found in private meetings and public press conferences with the president of the United States and the Secretary-General of NATO, as well as meeting with the soon-to-be new owners of Ukraine, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, preparing to impose their standard financial shock therapy. The current protestors in Ukraine don’t need PHDs in economics to know what this portends. They know about the impoverishment of Greece, Spain, et al. They also despise the new regime for its overthrow of their democratically-elected government, whatever its shortcomings. But the American media obscures these motivations by almost always referring to them simply as “pro-Russian”.

An exception, albeit rather unemphasized, was the April 17 Washington Post which reported from Donetsk that many of the eastern Ukrainians whom the author interviewed said the unrest in their region was driven by fear of “economic hardship” and the IMF austerity plan that will make their lives even harder: “At a most dangerous and delicate time, just as it battles Moscow for hearts and minds across the east, the pro-Western government is set to initiate a shock therapy of economic measures to meet the demands of an emergency bailout from the International Monetary Fund.”

Arseniy Yatsenuk, it should be noted, has something called the Arseniy Yatsenuk Foundation. If you go to the foundation’s website you will see the logos of the foundation’s “partners”. Among these partners we find NATO, the National Endowment for Democracy, the US State Department, Chatham House (Royal Institute of International Affairs in the UK), the German Marshall Fund (a think tank founded by the German government in honor of the US Marshall Plan), as well as a couple of international banks. Is any comment needed?

Full article: http://williamblum.org/aer/read/128

(# - bolded by me).


The IMF goes to war in Ukraine

By Pepe Escobar
Source: RT.com
May 7, 2014

The IMF has approved a $17 billion loan to Ukraine. The first $3.2 billion tranche has arrived on Wednesday.

It’s essential to identify the conditions attached to this Mafia-style “loan.” Nothing remotely similar to reviving the Ukrainian economy is in play. The scheme is inextricably linked to the IMF’s notorious, one-size-fits-all “structural adjustment” policy, known to hundreds of millions from Latin America and Southeast Asia to Southern Europe.

The regime changers in Kiev have duly complied, launching the inevitable austerity package – from tax hikes and frozen pensions to a stiff, over 50 percent rise on the price of natural gas heating Ukrainian homes. The “Ukrainian people” won’t be able to pay their utility bills this coming winter.

Predictably, the massive loan is not for the benefit of “the Ukrainian people.” Kiev is essentially bankrupt. Creditors range from Western banks to Gazprom – which is owed no less than $2.7 billion. The “loan” will pay back these creditors; not to mention that $5 billion of the total is earmarked for payments of – what else – previous IMF loans. It goes without saying that a lot of the funds will be duly pocketed – Afghanistan-style – by the current bunch of oligarchs aligned with the “Yats” government in Kiev......

Full article: http://zcomm.org/znetarticle/the-imf-goes-to-war-in-ukraine/



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

counterpunch ? JI7 May 2014 #1
Counterpunch is a liberal site newthinking May 2014 #4
Funny that someone would question Counterpunch as a source or not be familiar with it. Jesus Malverde May 2014 #20
comparing Counterpunch to Mother Jones is an insult to Mother Jones... dionysus May 2014 #52
True, Sir: 'Mother Jones' Is A Solid Left Journal The Magistrate May 2014 #54
Ok Jesus Malverde May 2014 #57
Counterpunch is certainly not "liberal" and it is probably not even "leftist" struggle4progress May 2014 #30
You're wrong. Jesus Malverde May 2014 #33
Perhaps to your view, a-holes like "Israel Shamir" are liberals or leftists struggle4progress May 2014 #38
They Go In For Paul Craig Roberts As well, Sir: A Virulent Racist And Anti-Semite The Magistrate May 2014 #43
And, of course, Paul Craig Roberts has also published "Israel Shamir" struggle4progress May 2014 #56
They Do, Sir, Edge Out At Times Into That Shadowy Place.... The Magistrate May 2014 #35
Ideologues are often similar, insofar as the same psychological mechanisms are required struggle4progress May 2014 #48
True, Sir The Magistrate May 2014 #66
another one under the bus. Lets see, common Dreams, Press TV, Slate, Democracy now newthinking May 2014 #36
What this site need is a list of "approved" sources... MattSh May 2014 #59
Yep, they may need to convene a council and have hearings to decide newthinking May 2014 #60
You're wrong. Jesus Malverde May 2014 #63
"Press TV" ???! LOL Who doesn't love the mouth piece of the Iranian Ayatollah's?? n/t EX500rider May 2014 #72
Don't forget the North Korean News Agency! EX500rider May 2014 #73
+1000 eom Purveyor May 2014 #75
Counterpuke is not a "liberal site." ProSense May 2014 #46
How about these. I don't source RT. So maybe you can tell me who I should believe and who not? newthinking May 2014 #51
Maybe you should make a list of all the books we should burn, err I mean sites we should BAN. rhett o rick May 2014 #68
quite familiar with that crackpot joint, thank you... dionysus May 2014 #50
Why dont you spell out your objection in lieu of "insinuation by question"? nm rhett o rick May 2014 #47
rhett o rick ? Jesus Malverde May 2014 #64
Have Not read Swill Like This Since Pravda, Sir The Magistrate May 2014 #2
There is no way you had time to read the article (other than skim and find something out of context newthinking May 2014 #3
You Post a Thing Up, Sir, You Get People Commenting On It The Magistrate May 2014 #6
you win the match, easily... Sir dionysus May 2014 #53
I have to laugh my ass off at you, seriously .... polly7 May 2014 #5
I See No Reason To Believe He Spoke To Any Such Person, Ma'am The Magistrate May 2014 #7
Many of us are able to remember 'history', see what's happening today right polly7 May 2014 #8
And Somehow, Ma'am, The People Who Say That In This Dispute The Magistrate May 2014 #9
You give yourself far too much credit, believing only you know what is propaganda. polly7 May 2014 #10
You Might Say That, Ma'am: I Would Refrain From Comment On If You Are Or Are Not Stupid The Magistrate May 2014 #11
I'll comment on what I please, whether you consider me stupid or not, polly7 May 2014 #12
I Have Nothing Against Russia Or Russians, Ma'am The Magistrate May 2014 #13
"The rest of this just noise, and not worth serious engagement." polly7 May 2014 #14
You Seem To Be Cheering For Something, Ma'am The Magistrate May 2014 #15
I'm cheering for a people to have the ability to decide their own fate, polly7 May 2014 #16
Then, Ma'am, You Support Over-Throwing Yanukovich Some Weeks Ago The Magistrate May 2014 #17
No, don't lie about what I support. polly7 May 2014 #18
If, Ma'am, You Support People Being Free To Decide Their Fate Without Fear, You Must The Magistrate May 2014 #19
There were no votes, polly7 May 2014 #21
Ah...The IMF Threw The Coup, Ma'am.... The Magistrate May 2014 #22
Of course it does. polly7 May 2014 #23
Not a Fact Worth Mentioning In The Lot, Ma'am The Magistrate May 2014 #24
Oh. polly7 May 2014 #25
Nothing, Ma'am, That Constitutes Evidence The IMF Procured A Coup The Magistrate May 2014 #26
Well, at least I'm not supporting a brutal right-wing 'leadership' intent on shoving austerity down polly7 May 2014 #27
You Are Supporting Putin, Ma'am: A Right-Wing Fascist Bent On Seizing Land And People The Magistrate May 2014 #28
'Putin' isn't the one burning protesters alive or gunning them down. polly7 May 2014 #29
The Present Violence, Ma'am, Owes To Putin's Procurement Of Secession The Magistrate May 2014 #31
I just said, I 'don't' support Putin. polly7 May 2014 #32
And Yet In Fact, Ma'am, You Do The Magistrate May 2014 #34
I think I love you! William769 May 2014 #37
Thank You, Sir The Magistrate May 2014 #39
That's 'too', and I'm not deaf at all. polly7 May 2014 #41
LOL! polly7 May 2014 #40
I Appreciate Your Confirmation, Ma'am, Of The Accuracy Of My Comments The Magistrate May 2014 #44
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #45
See, good things happen to those who wait. William769 May 2014 #55
Seeing a master at work is a privilege. Number23 May 2014 #62
Do you know about the USSR occupation of Ukraine? Do you know about Stalin's slaughter snagglepuss May 2014 #67
Since you're obviously the expert... MattSh May 2014 #58
Every time I see this sort of crap... MohRokTah May 2014 #42
I hope you'll go sign up and march along with them TBF May 2014 #69
I'm too old. MohRokTah May 2014 #70
now counterpunch nationalize the fed May 2014 #49
counterpunch has been a joke for a long time , it was mostly Hannah Bell JI7 May 2014 #61
What are you thinking, nobody can stop them... Jesus Malverde May 2014 #65
forget Counterpunch, let's consider Andre Vltchek G_j May 2014 #71
Wow. It lost me from the first sentence. Literally. Tommy_Carcetti May 2014 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will the Government Liste...»Reply #23