Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How the Left Cut Down a Democratic Frontrunner [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)64. I don't think it was an accident that the GOP candidate was dead in the water.
The GOP did not back him, either. Bush owed Joe and they both knew it.

And, who knows, maybe the Republicans already knew that Joe would be backing their guy (and gal) come 2008.
Why the Democrats left Lamont damaged and "twisting slowly, slowly in the wind" is another issue.
But, clearly, Joe was supposed to win.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If the left pushes back against the "third way" the left is the villain, but if the third way
myrna minx
May 2014
#2
your last sentence explains the dynamic perfectly. the Rahmbos treat Repubs with kid gloves
yurbud
May 2014
#35
Perfect analogy, Yurbud. But as the election draws closer, we can expect more handy narratives...
villager
May 2014
#66
and no matter how few Republicans, centrists will have no choice but to compromise with them
yurbud
May 2014
#76
Exactly. As long as there is a single Republican anywhere, their agenda must be enacted.
villager
May 2014
#77
and bipartisan. Unless that single Republican suggests something rich people don't like
yurbud
May 2014
#93
that's how it will play in the press--even if the "sensible centrist" loses the general election
yurbud
May 2014
#34
And, while "centrist" my be a slur some places, it garners support and big boxes of money elsewhere
Doctor_J
May 2014
#42
Yes, it is exactly about marketing. Wolf used $10 Million of his own money to come out early
okaawhatever
May 2014
#45
I think the left is primed for something like a tea party takeover. People are angry and
okaawhatever
May 2014
#60
Yep. He proved that America was ready for an unapologetic socialist firebrand (nt)
Nye Bevan
May 2014
#29
It's a scaremongering tactic, intended to quash those lefty malcontents.
winter is coming
May 2014
#65
De Blasio was not in a statewide race, but a Mayoral race that a Democrat had not won since 1989.
merrily
May 2014
#16
Which also explains their ultra-thin skins. They love bullying, snark, and shout-downs, but alert on
villager
May 2014
#94
Nope we're not in a revolutionary or even a pre-revolutionary situation....
socialist_n_TN
May 2014
#105
Centrists are to be blamed for their own loss ...and ya better take this as a warning.
L0oniX
May 2014
#21
I sure wish corporatists could decide whether "the left" is an insult or their favorite club.
Marr
May 2014
#25
Its a difficult maneuver, co-opting "The Left" while simultaneously vilifying it
bobduca
May 2014
#85
I used to post on boards where all political views were welcome (in theory, anyway).
merrily
May 2014
#96
We're told repeatedly that the deck is not stacked, but that the Party is not going
merrily
May 2014
#44
Maybe I'm being naive, but Mr. Wolfe's website indicates that he still ives in the house he was born
hedgehog
May 2014
#54
Her ads against Tom Wolfe, the Democratic frontrunner are downright vicious. IMO Democrats
AlinPA
May 2014
#56
Yes. It's the Left that really needs to use its political omnipotence more wisely.
Orsino
May 2014
#80
I'd say GOOD!!! but the headline is bullshit, the Turd Wayer flushed her self
TheKentuckian
May 2014
#107