Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
6. Perhaps what he means is that it was a conservative moment on wall street
Tue May 13, 2014, 08:17 AM
May 2014

He's a wall street guy; so he probably believes that at that moment, Wall Street was chastened by the failure of all the new baffling complex investment vehicles they had invented which had subsequently blown up. They didn't need to be regulated by Elizabeth Warren because they were already in a "conservative" frame of mind, and unlikely to make the same mistakes.

Of course that's a pretty self serving narrative; while it's true that perhaps at that specific moment Wall Street was less inclined towards fanciful investments, in the same sense that everybody is a good driver for a few weeks after they are in an accident, they would return to their reckless ways soon enough. And I'd feel a lot better with Warren overlooking their "innovations."

Bryant

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tim Geithner Criticizes E...»Reply #6