Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'I Have Been to the Darkest Corners of Government, and What They Fear Is Light' [View all]KoKo
(84,711 posts)2. Recommend! and...Here's Tom Englehardt's Introduction.. Also a Good Read
Introductory Comment On: "Glenn Greenwald, How I Met Edward Snowden"
by Tom Englehardt
http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175843/
Make no mistake: its been the year of Edward Snowden. Not since Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War has a trove of documents revealing the inner workings and thinking of the U.S. government so changed the conversation. In Ellsbergs case, that conversation was transformed only in the United States. Snowden has changed it worldwide. From six-year-olds to Angela Merkel, who hasnt been thinking about the staggering ambitions of the National Security Agency, about its urge to create the first global security state in history and so step beyond even the most fervid dreams of the totalitarian regimes of the last century? And who hasnt been struck by how close the agency has actually come to sweeping up the communications of the whole planet? Technologically speaking, what Snowden revealed to the world -- thanks to journalist Glenn Greenwald and filmmaker Laura Poitras -- was a remarkable accomplishment, as well as a nightmare directly out of some dystopian novel.
From exploiting backdoors into the Internets critical infrastructure and close relationships with the planet's largest tech companies to performing economic espionage and sending spy avatars into video games, the NSA has been relentless in its search for complete global omniscience, even if that is by no means the same thing as omnipotence. It now has the ability to be a hidden part of just about any conversation just about anywhere. Of course, we dont yet know the half of it, since no Edward Snowden has yet stepped forward from the inner precincts of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the CIA, the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, or other such outfits in the "U.S. intelligence community." Still, what we do know should take our collective breath away. And we know it all thanks to one young man, hounded across the planet by the U.S. government in an international manhunt.
As an NSA contractor, Snowden found himself inside the blanket of secrecy that has fallen across our national security state since 9/11 and there he absorbed an emerging principle on which this country was never founded: that they know whats best for us, and that, in true Orwellian fashion, our ignorance is our strength. Increasingly, this has become Washington's twenty-first-century mantra, which is not to be challenged. Hence, the extremity of the outrage, as well as the threats and fantasies of harm, expressed by those in power (or their recently retired channelers) toward Snowden.
One brave young man with his head firmly fastened on his shoulders found himself trapped in Moscow and yet never lost his balance, his good sense, or his focus. As Jonathan Schell wrote in September 2013, What happened to Snowden in Moscow diagramed the new global reality. He wanted to leave Russia, but the State Department, in an act of highly dubious legality, stripped him of his passport, leaving him -- for purposes of travel, at least -- stateless. Suddenly, he was welcome nowhere in the great wide world, which shrank down to a single point: the transit lounge at Sheremetyevo [Airport]. Then, having by its own action trapped him in Russia, the administration mocked and reviled him for remaining in an authoritarian country. Only in unfree countries was Edward Snowden welcome. What we are pleased to call the free world had become a giant prison for a hero of freedom.
And of course, there was also a determined journalist, who proved capable of keeping his focus on what mattered while under fierce attack, who never took his eyes off the prize. Im talking, of course, about Glenn Greenwald. Without him (and the Guardian, Laura Poitras, and Barton Gellman of the Washington Post), they would be observing us, 24/7, but we would not be observing them. This small group has shaken the world.
This is publication day for Greenwalds new book, No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Security State, about his last near-year swept away by the Snowden affair. Its been under wraps until now for obvious reasons. Today, TomDispatch is proud, thanks to the kindness of Greenwalds publisher, Metropolitan Books, to be releasing an adapted, much shortened version of its first chapter on how this odyssey of our American moment began.-- Tom
------------------
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
220 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'I Have Been to the Darkest Corners of Government, and What They Fear Is Light' [View all]
Octafish
May 2014
OP
Because it's very different. Also, the USG is both buying AND selling our info in the marketplace.
merrily
May 2014
#85
It was not intentional. In fact, I had edited my original version of that sentence
merrily
May 2014
#182
Yes, no and maybe. I stand by my statement, as it was phrased, in the context in which I made it.
merrily
Jun 2014
#215
Oh, I know...that's more what I was thinking when I first posted, actually.
BlancheSplanchnik
Jun 2014
#216
I agree that there is the left and then there is the left. (We need some new vocabulary words, but
merrily
May 2014
#105
Thanks..and if you go to the link he has news reports to back up all of his statements
KoKo
May 2014
#50
Is this some kind of federal holiday that the anti-Snowden crowd is taking off?
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#203
Rather than protect the First Amendment, they attack the whistleblower and the reporter.
Octafish
May 2014
#69
Me too. I was going to say that sound you hear is the security-state apologists heads exploding. nt
silvershadow
May 2014
#77
How can anyone not get that he is a hero of epic proporations, with a fearless heart of justice?
DesertDiamond
May 2014
#9
And This Matters To You Why? - Seems Irrelevant To Others - Further Where Is The Proof?
cantbeserious
May 2014
#86
Yes - The Cognitive Dissonance In Left Leaning Authoritarians Is Surely Debilitating
cantbeserious
May 2014
#88
The left lionized Ellsberg for revealing info that happened to embarrass a Democratic President.
merrily
May 2014
#90
This *did* hit the fan during the Bush administration. Does nobody else remember 2005?
Recursion
May 2014
#92
Are you saying th left all supportive of Bush at that time? Is that your point about my post?
merrily
May 2014
#103
Congress can pass any law it wants, at which point the sanctioned activity is "legal"
Recursion
May 2014
#118
No, that is "merely wrong." Violations of the Constitution do not become legal when Congress
merrily
May 2014
#119
I had already answered your question. BTW, how many of my questions and point have you avoided
merrily
May 2014
#122
Well, now you've resorted to pretending I said things I never said. Know another word for that?
merrily
May 2014
#125
Do you mean the South China Morning Post? Is this the interview you're referencing?
merrily
May 2014
#108
Do you seriously think that China and Russia did not know which of their systems
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#204
"That meant the NSA was secretly and indiscriminately collecting the telephone records
yodermon
May 2014
#15
The case cited by the poster does not dispose of the legality issue as to what is going on now.
merrily
May 2014
#134
The applicability of Smith v. Maryland to the NSA's blanket surveillance activities is questionable.
Maedhros
May 2014
#36
You do understand that the court is there literally for the purpose of interpreting the law... right
TroglodyteScholar
May 2014
#62
Trog, you are right. Case law can overturn statute law. Marbury v. Madison, 1803.
Manifestor_of_Light
May 2014
#67
Don't conflate a court interpreting a statute--which Congress can overrule by enacting a new law--
merrily
May 2014
#159
Nothing you say here is incorrect nor does it contradict what I said. So we agree!
Vattel
May 2014
#166
Google "Gov. George Wallace denied a Supreme Court decision was the law of the land."
merrily
May 2014
#158
The point is kind of pedantic, but even when a court does overturn an earlier decision
Vattel
May 2014
#180
Yes, it does. Unless and until Plessy was overturned, it was the law of the land.
merrily
May 2014
#185
You are quite right that in the case of common law, judges make law and and change law.
Vattel
May 2014
#189
Not in those exact words, but that was the implication, given that the subject was whether judges
merrily
May 2014
#198
So no spying? No wiretaps? No investigations? What a perfect world you must live in.
randome
May 2014
#21
Our Constitution is a contract entered into by representatives of the people of the US.
JDPriestly
May 2014
#29
The Social Security Administration does not compile and analyze your data with huge
JDPriestly
May 2014
#60
If the laws need to be updated, I don't have a problem with that. Why would I?
randome
May 2014
#104
A couple of other whistleblowers tried to warn us without bringing out the huge array of
JDPriestly
May 2014
#172
Which still avoids answering, let alone, asking, the question of whom the NSA monitors.
randome
May 2014
#96
Exactly. It's modified legally only by amendment. Let someone put a modification to a vote.
merrily
May 2014
#137
'Allies' as in liberal thinkers of DU. Not 'allies' as in international espionage.
randome
May 2014
#161
No they'll never end spying, its been going on since mankind first days
LiberalLovinLug
May 2014
#191
How is it that you know the answer as to whether the NSA's actions are directed at American
JDPriestly
May 2014
#53
And was this info from the NSA provided as a consequence of international monitoring?
randome
May 2014
#100
Well, at least bringing up that point out of nowhere spared you from the Constitutional issues.
merrily
May 2014
#107
The NSA was not supposed to turn its powers on the citizens of the United States.
Octafish
May 2014
#24
Yes. I know about Gehlen. I will have to read Blowback. Somehow I missed it. Thanks.
JDPriestly
May 2014
#75
+10000 I wish I could rec this post. It should be on the top of every forum.
woo me with science
May 2014
#169