Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grins

(9,470 posts)
12. More than that...
Tue May 13, 2014, 10:44 AM
May 2014

Clarence did not disclose his wife's income from the Heritage Foundation and Liberty Central, as was required, for twenty years, Clarence Thomas has never revealed the source of that income. Twenty. Years.

IRS a couple weeks ago:
"The Patrick Henry Center for Individual Liberty... “has shown a pattern of deliberate and consistent intervention in political campaigns” and made “repeated statements supporting or opposing various candidates by expressing its opinion of the respective candidate’s character and qualifications".

"...most recent tax return disclosed $343,503 in revenue for tax year 2012. In recent years, it’s become aligned with the Tea Party movement, contributing to at least one of the groups targeted for extra scrutiny by the IRS beginning in 2010. Also in 2010, the Patrick Henry Center merged with Liberty Central, an advocacy group headed by Virginia Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas."


The IRS evoked their tax-exempt status. Time to cough up on all those back taxes or go to jail.

Not to mention his failure to recuse himself when cases came before the bench in which his wife was directly involved. Lookin' at you too, Vaffanculo!

More, he failed to disclose $100,000 that Citizens United spent on his behalf in 1991 to support his nomination. That would be an in-kind contribution which should have been disclosed as such.

Thomas is in clear violation of Canon 4C of the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges, which bars federal judges from using the prestige of their judicial office for fundraising purposes and specifically states that “a judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program” of a fundraising event." In Nov. of last year, Thomas headlined a fundraiser for the Federalist Society, a group that regularly appears before the Court.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Impeach Clarence Thomas? [View all] marmar May 2014 OP
Yes, he must be impeached along with Roberts randys1 May 2014 #1
Scaly is not qualified to bag mikeysnot May 2014 #2
Forget Sharia law, we need to worry about Scalia Law. n/t aggiesal May 2014 #25
Ooh! I see bumper sticker there! Atman May 2014 #26
Have to admit, I stole it from ... aggiesal May 2014 #27
That is a good one! Enthusiast May 2014 #36
What did Roberts lie about? woolldog May 2014 #34
everything, claimed he would respect precedent on several issues randys1 May 2014 #37
Very interesting. woolldog May 2014 #38
Scalia and Thoma also attend fund-raisers which is against some legal code of ethics. No sanction okaawhatever May 2014 #3
More than that... Grins May 2014 #12
Thx for that extra info. I knew his wife had created a situation for him that was immoral/illegal okaawhatever May 2014 #19
Such a thing could happen only if we elect a very strong MineralMan May 2014 #4
Yes, this can happen. GOTV 2014! Every election is the most important in history, but this one mountain grammy May 2014 #14
it could be a gotv motivator - gotv 2014 to impeach thomas and scalia leftyohiolib May 2014 #16
^^^THIS^^^ 2naSalit May 2014 #15
The Democrats last controlled the House during the 110th and 111th Congresses totodeinhere May 2014 #21
One would have to be sure that this strong majority really wanted KoKo May 2014 #22
Very interesting..K&R Jefferson23 May 2014 #5
How could we possibly impeach him? NV Whino May 2014 #6
Won't happen. Katashi_itto May 2014 #7
As for return on investment for his salary, we would have gotten more out of store window manikin.nt Snotcicles May 2014 #8
just think iamthebandfanman May 2014 #9
+1000 Louisiana1976 May 2014 #30
there is a movie heaven05 May 2014 #10
I see an easier path to correct the court Major Nikon May 2014 #11
FDR tried that melm00se May 2014 #18
FDR used it as a bluff which worked Major Nikon May 2014 #20
a bluff only melm00se May 2014 #23
Not necessarily Major Nikon May 2014 #32
What did Clarence Thomas say when someone spilled a soft drink in his lap? KansDem May 2014 #13
.... Louisiana1976 May 2014 #28
Yes, Yes, YES titanicdave May 2014 #17
Don't just impeach smallcat88 May 2014 #24
Well said. And welcome to DU. Louisiana1976 May 2014 #29
Why the question mark?? n/t Peregrine Took May 2014 #31
There are good grounds to impeach Thomas Gothmog May 2014 #33
Yes, make it so dreamnightwind May 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Impeach Clarence Thomas?»Reply #12