Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I've been repeatedly questioned about Sea Stars - starfish controversy, so [View all]RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)36. Right
That's why I posted it. If i wanted to be unfair and deceiving, I would not have posted that link, eh?
But...... let us consider why they made that statement.
First, what if they said it was related? They would have been jumped on by all the nuke-supporters in the world and their lawyers. Not to mention any funding for the study would have dried up instantly. Amirite?
Too, they don't have the science to declare what is causing the die off. Read another way: They don't know.
All i have done is present a possible reason. And presented more than one side, with that link.
I have been following that link for months now and they still don't know.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've been repeatedly questioned about Sea Stars - starfish controversy, so [View all]
RobertEarl
May 2014
OP
come on man, don't kick a guy when he's digging his own hole deeper.. have some respect!
dionysus
May 2014
#48
There should be plenty of reports, but, for some reason, the funding's not there.
Octafish
May 2014
#53