Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
36. Right
Tue May 13, 2014, 05:43 PM
May 2014

That's why I posted it. If i wanted to be unfair and deceiving, I would not have posted that link, eh?

But...... let us consider why they made that statement.

First, what if they said it was related? They would have been jumped on by all the nuke-supporters in the world and their lawyers. Not to mention any funding for the study would have dried up instantly. Amirite?

Too, they don't have the science to declare what is causing the die off. Read another way: They don't know.

All i have done is present a possible reason. And presented more than one side, with that link.

I have been following that link for months now and they still don't know.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Real science and enenews don't belong on the same page. n/t FSogol May 2014 #1
Sure it does RobertEarl May 2014 #3
When you state: "The whole N. Pacific is now contaminated" and then offer to FSogol May 2014 #7
Ask away RobertEarl May 2014 #15
Milk is just pulp free cow juice. nt Demo_Chris May 2014 #59
. Orrex May 2014 #2
No image shown here RobertEarl May 2014 #4
. Orrex May 2014 #13
No images here RobertEarl May 2014 #16
If you knew enough to use your jury blacklist ... oldhippie May 2014 #18
Do you generate a lot of hide-worthy posts? Orrex May 2014 #22
Wild theories? RobertEarl May 2014 #29
You rely heavily on unreliable source material Orrex May 2014 #30
So, the answer is NO RobertEarl May 2014 #31
So, the answer is YES Orrex May 2014 #32
Now that's better RobertEarl May 2014 #34
Stop it Orrex! NuclearDem May 2014 #24
Who? Me? Orrex May 2014 #33
Pahahaha NuclearDem May 2014 #9
Perfect! maddezmom May 2014 #14
I see my fan club lining up RobertEarl May 2014 #20
Oh so sweet of you to be embarrassed maddezmom May 2014 #23
I'm not RobertEarl May 2014 #26
Happy to kick and let people read your nonsense of an OP! zappaman May 2014 #27
come on man, don't kick a guy when he's digging his own hole deeper.. have some respect! dionysus May 2014 #48
Not sure I would consider it a fan club per se maddezmom May 2014 #28
Some of us know what ISN'T killing the starfish and... zappaman May 2014 #25
Sea Stars Um Yummy LOL snooper2 May 2014 #58
Wharrgarbl!!! Codeine May 2014 #5
Hey codiene RobertEarl May 2014 #6
It's cute when you say "science" like you know what it means. Codeine May 2014 #10
No I have not been refuted RobertEarl May 2014 #12
Posting the same thing over and over again NuclearDem May 2014 #8
Summary RobertEarl May 2014 #11
Excellent post, thanks. broiles May 2014 #17
Thanks RobertEarl May 2014 #21
Yup! zappaman May 2014 #19
From your last source ... GeorgeGist May 2014 #35
Right RobertEarl May 2014 #36
heh. zappaman May 2014 #38
Did you hear Japan passed a Fukushima secrets law? RobertEarl May 2014 #40
Nope FBaggins May 2014 #42
Einstein's definition applies here. hobbit709 May 2014 #37
I need a better class of fan club RobertEarl May 2014 #39
No you haven't (been questioned) FBaggins May 2014 #41
Plutonium got spread worldwide. Yet fools pretend there's nothing wrong. Octafish May 2014 #43
You've got a funny definition of good work. NuclearDem May 2014 #44
I don't care. I respect the poster of the OP. Octafish May 2014 #52
What exactly do you respect? NuclearDem May 2014 #57
Thanks Octafish RobertEarl May 2014 #60
You keep citing that paper - though you've been corrected FBaggins May 2014 #49
Corrected? Where? Octafish May 2014 #51
Here's the latest that I see FBaggins May 2014 #54
Yet, there are no links to sources or articles. Just your word, FBaggins. Octafish May 2014 #55
It was your link FBaggins May 2014 #56
Thanks, Octafish RobertEarl May 2014 #50
There should be plenty of reports, but, for some reason, the funding's not there. Octafish May 2014 #53
DU rec #5... SidDithers May 2014 #45
Lol! FBaggins May 2014 #46
Pure gold... SidDithers May 2014 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I've been repeatedly ques...»Reply #36