Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why weren't bush and cheney at the... [View all]ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)47. DUzy! (whatever happened with that flipout thread the other day?) and thread win! LOL! nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For the same reason that they never attended any of the funerals of soldiers killed in their wars.
jwirr
May 2014
#2
I wonder if the families have asked that they not be a part of any ceremony that
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#4
Good point.. they don't want to be associated with their epic Fail. Think no one will notice. nt
Cha
May 2014
#76
They know that by this time too many survivors are fully aware of their culpability...
Hekate
May 2014
#3
Probably because they were afraid of massive protests. And there would have been.
octoberlib
May 2014
#7
Protesting what? Didn't a huge cheer go up when shrub hefted the bullhorn? What
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#10
Are we allowed to say that now? Back when I was a lurker, it was not allowed
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#12
Then why hasn't anyone been held accountable for the failures that day or for
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#14
Thank you for the compelling illustrative graphics on the epic bush-cheney failures before, during,
Cha
May 2014
#77
"THIS painting is going to be my masterpiece and my legacy, momma!" - shrub
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#15
His wife was hawking her book on Mrs Greenspan's show on MSNBC yesterday in...New York. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#20
Haha, is that yours, KansDem? Funny and tragic all at the same time. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#34
Why wouldn't they want them there? Of course, we know (or suspect) why they don't, but
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#29
But the confederates don't even admit that it took place under shrubco's watch. Even as
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#37
So is there something to the "Truther" "nonsense", afterall? Are we ready to admit that in GD? nt
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#39
OH! My bad, lol! You've been here since before I lurked the first time back in '05. Wow!
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#49
If we parse the words there, it does not say he was invited, only that he declined a
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#45
DUzy! (whatever happened with that flipout thread the other day?) and thread win! LOL! nt
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#47
The guy who does the DUzy threads got pissed off. I'll see if I can find it. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2014
#52
Because they're rotting in The Hague along with Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld and Yoo.
NuclearDem
May 2014
#62
If only they had gone, people could be pissed they were there instead of pissed they weren't. n/t
hughee99
May 2014
#64
Because those asses coudnt bear a Barack "HUSSEIN MUSLIN " Obama honor 911 vicitims!!!!!
mylye2222
May 2014
#78
Because they intentionally ignored clear warnings of an impending terrorist attack.
Enthusiast
May 2014
#81