Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Well now I've been educated. But I probably learned something other than the intended lesson. [View all]Violet_Crumble
(36,387 posts)78. fwiw, I'm an Australian woman...
Okay, the word is a gender slur in the US. I don't think anyone's disputing that. What some people are disputing is that it's not a gender slur in Australia. They're wrong.
...rather to point out that the argument that foreign members earn a special dispensation in using slurs is rejected by some of the same people seeking to justify use of the most vulgar word in the English language to demean women.
I wouldn't use the word here at DU or if I was in America, because I know it's used a different way there. The only person who said 'c**t' in the thread that spawned these new threads was an Australian politician in the Australian parliament. He's not a member of DU and if he joined he'd get nuked on the spot for being a RW fuckwit. Much as I detest him, he wasn't using the word to demean women. He was expressing his dislike of the leader of the opposition as the govt's been getting slammed this week over the Budget, which is likely going to be blocked by the Senate. He could have just as easily called him a wanker, a fuckwit, a dickhead or a bunch of other things, as they're all pretty much interchangeable. The issue isn't that he tried to demean women by calling Bill Shorten a 'c**t', because that's not what he was doing. The issue is that he swore at another member of parliament, which is totally unprofessional, and he should have been suspended from the house for it. Leave that and other profanities for the footy games, the backyard BBQs and admiring yr friends cars, but Parliament's not a place for it...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well now I've been educated. But I probably learned something other than the intended lesson. [View all]
11 Bravo
May 2014
OP
And anyone that thinks banning words will change the thinking of the people using them
hobbit709
May 2014
#1
Does that include making up definitions to words as I have seen done here in the past.
hobbit709
May 2014
#21
I didn't say it was that word. You obviously are fixated on just one word instead of many.
hobbit709
May 2014
#25
thank you. that word means the same thing all around the (english speaking) world
elehhhhna
May 2014
#35
But the speaker of the word that initiated all of this WAS. Is that really ...
11 Bravo
May 2014
#15
Seriously, you are going to rely on your faulty memory to paraphrase an argument I never made?
seaglass
May 2014
#31
Can you link to what you are talking about because I just went to My Posts and I don't see any
seaglass
May 2014
#41
Americans are bad people, unless of course the opposite is needed for the narrative.
Rex
May 2014
#23
I was kind of hoping that those of you who couldn't wait to rush over there to bash HoF and
seaglass
May 2014
#50
I've only been noticed these arguments on DU since DU3 and I've been a DUer since 2001. From what
seaglass
May 2014
#63
Nah I was here when you dropped in. I wasn't fantasizing, I was hoping. Pretty bad when you see
seaglass
May 2014
#72
I do think a fanny PACK is a fashion crime and as such, well-nigh alertable.
Warren DeMontague
May 2014
#62
What would be your reaction if a Brit were to say they were going to "knock you up"?
Fumesucker
May 2014
#30
I was attacked for saying how the word's used here*. Are you accusing me of promoting MRA bullshit?
Violet_Crumble
May 2014
#85
I believe "shag" is much more offensive in England that it is here in America.
Maedhros
May 2014
#69
I don't see how this OP insulted you if you weren't even aware of the original thread...
Violet_Crumble
May 2014
#96