Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(33,287 posts)
20. For the 2nd time a jury has shown this article is no longer tolerated on DU.
Tue May 20, 2014, 12:08 AM
May 2014
ALERTER'S COMMENTS

As Sid explains in reply #4, RFK Jr.'s "Deadly Immunity" article was retracted by Salon.com 6 years after its original publication. We've reached the point in time that "Deadly Immunity" goes straight in the same trash bin as Janet Cooke's story about the heroin-addicted boy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Cooke#Fabricated_story_scandal and pretty much anything published in Infowars.

People have gotten BANNED for posting excerpts from this article. See:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4934964

yes, "Deadly Immunity" is also hosted at ICNR.com, a site whose parent org International Center for Nutritional Research is listed by Quackwatch as a "questionable research entity": http://www.quackwatch.com/04ConsumerEducation/nonrecorg.html

I expect some of you to say "well just show this user where he's wrong". But remember, as ToS state: "Democratic Underground is not intended to be a platform for kooks and crackpots peddling paranoid fantasies with little or no basis in fact." Anti vaccine propaganda like RFK's now-discredited article or anything that alleges vaccines are part of a big pharma plot something something meet that very definition. "Free speech" does NOT include allowing any kook and crank idea to stand. Sorry.

Oh wait...check THIS gem out. "But I saw my son change and become austistic after receiving a combo vaccine at 18 months." I have nothing but sympathy for parents shocked to see their kid have autism or whatever. But parroting the same B.S. that Jenny McCarthy said...seriously? Are you out of your mind?

JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Tue May 20, 2014, 12:02 AM, and voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter is being a bit of an asshole here. I don't agree with the post which was alerted on, but referring to the poster's experience with a child with autism as "a gem" and calling the poster a "kook" crosses the line. I also don't find the post alerted on to be hide-worthy. MIsguided and incorrect, sure. But that doesn't equate to hide. Hey, alerter. YOU should try hide and ignore. It will help your blood pressure. Can I alert on the alert?
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Woo Hoo!
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I was going to say leave it and just answer back that the article had been pulled from publications because of the numerous errors but I see more than one person has tried this and the poster still persists it is a credible article.

Thank you.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

WHARGARBLE anecdotal evidence WHARGARBLE!! KamaAina May 2014 #1
DU rec... SidDithers May 2014 #2
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #3
Please find another link than whale.to... SidDithers May 2014 #4
Here is the rolling stone link kimbutgar May 2014 #6
For the 2nd time a jury has shown this article is no longer tolerated on DU. alp227 May 2014 #20
Here are some other great links on that site! Codeine May 2014 #5
I didn't know whale was a wacko site kimbutgar May 2014 #7
That's an article so bad it's been pulled from a number of sites. nt Codeine May 2014 #8
Ladies and Gentlemen, I present another sad case of Orrex May 2014 #17
I really hope there will come a time when we can put this shit to bed NuclearDem May 2014 #9
But people want to believe it shenmue May 2014 #10
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #11
No, you really don't. jeff47 May 2014 #15
We never will. Archae May 2014 #13
but but that Playboy centerfold said the exact opposite NightWatcher May 2014 #12
No doubt they also pin-pointed the true cause with a sample that large. What did they GoneFishin May 2014 #14
So what's the real cause of cancer? jeff47 May 2014 #16
Cancer researchers don't repeatedly harp on a single NON-cause of cancer ad nauseam. GoneFishin May 2014 #19
Damned if they do, damned if they don't NuclearDem May 2014 #22
They would be looking for an actual cause NuclearDem May 2014 #18
Suprise! LostOne4Ever May 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vaccines still don’t caus...»Reply #20