General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Amanda Knox should surrender to Italian authorities, The EVIDENCE Is Clear Enough- SHE DID IT. [View all]corpus_vile
(29 posts)One poster referred to John Kercher as "The dirty old man" and another opined that Meredith brought her murder upon herself due to her "poor taste in men". These and other comments can be found here. [url]www.amandaknox.com/2013/12/18/with-respect-to-the-kercher-family[/url]
She also arrogantly demanded on her blog that the Kercher family would have to contact her personally before she'd agree to take down a link soliciting donations for Meredith's family, disregarding their lawyer's request despite him being the family spokesperson. He gets a lot of attacks also, being called a sleazy slimeball etc etc.
Here's another gem from "Kgeddy" btw.
"I think the time for treating them (the Kercher family) with kid gloves is over.. I can no longer tolerate their blatant disregard for the evidence. Nor can I tolerate their emotional drive to send you to prison. I think t's fair to say that their behaviour has been shamefull and I'm not afraid to say that"
Knox is a moderator of her blog and approves such comments in order for them to be posted, so nice to see she's keeping it classy as always.
No an e book or biased article written by a profiteer such as Steve Moore or Bruce Fischer does not equate to evidence of their innocence, sorry.
Also if the pro Knox camp need to use emotive terms such as "hater" and made up fictitious lexicons such as "guilter" then that intimates a decidedly weak argument and has her supporter coming across as a creepy Jim Jones style cult who have guzzled down the Kool Aid. It also makes the actual case against both defendants look all the stronger, so they may wish to consider that when making an argument for their innocence.