General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Amanda Knox should surrender to Italian authorities, The EVIDENCE Is Clear Enough- SHE DID IT. [View all]corpus_vile
(29 posts)How do you reckon his other reasoning is so sound and not prone to more mistakes? This is why the Galati appeal was a success.
How was she obviously coerced when her lawyer is making no noises in this regard and why take the word of a thrice convicted slanderer anyway over the cops who successfully convicted her of slander?
She didn't withdraw her statement, she went and made another one at 5.45 am, as in the five page one. She also left Lumumba in prison for two weeks, so how did she withdraw her statement if he still stayed in jail for weeks after she made it?
The "murder room" wasn't the crime scene, the entire house was and no trace of Guede was found in Romanelli's bedroom, despite Knox's supporters saying he gained entry there. I take it since there's no trace of him in the "burglary room", he must be innocent of it?
There was no dna traces found in Knox's bedroom and Sollecito's car either. Did they not sleep/drive in them so?
There's abundant evidence connecting K & S also.
No, his lies didn't reduce his sentence, his decision to opt for a fast track trial did, just as Knox and Sollecito could have opted for, rather than choosing to become media celebs.
Hopw so? How is a system which gives a defendant an automatic appeal and a shot at another appeal "ugly"? If Knox was convicted in the US, she probably would have gotten life, or the needle.
I have a feeling this case won't pass the ECHR's criteria actually, but we'll just have to wait and see, I guess.