General Discussion

Orrex

(67,115 posts)

98. LOL

Reply to Warpy (Reply #96)

Tue May 20, 2014, 09:13 AM

May 2014

I thought that was PennDOT.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

292 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Another nude sports figure pointlessly objectified on a magazine cover [View all] Orrex May 2014 OP

Oh, him. Since apparently only... TreasonousBastard May 2014 #1

Is that a dress or a towel? jmowreader May 2014 #30

It better be a dress or... TreasonousBastard May 2014 #36

The HOF crowd doesn't need a reason to have a fit. They just have them. jmowreader May 2014 #63

It's a fashion shoot just like the SI cover. Cleita May 2014 #2

I agree 100% Orrex May 2014 #3

Hate to tell you but it will be alerted on before next morning Cleita May 2014 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #20

Will you edit your subject line? pintobean May 2014 #64

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #66

Thanks pintobean May 2014 #68

LMAO!! Sissyk May 2014 #147

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #148

ROFL malaise May 2014 #69

Oh, my. antiquie May 2014 #4

So you think men's nudity is exploited in the same way women's nudity is? Whisp May 2014 #6

So you think men's nudity is fair game for exploitation? Orrex May 2014 #7

apples and oranges Supersedeas May 2014 #264

I think if people of any gender want to get naked and other people want to see those people naked Warren DeMontague May 2014 #21

I totally agree. mimi85 May 2014 #28

And where will these naked people be getting access to each other? R B Garr May 2014 #31

I don't understand the question. Warren DeMontague May 2014 #38

I didn't understand either what you meant by people getting naked R B Garr May 2014 #41

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #42

Okay. I know this OP was posted for snark, but I just wanted to see R B Garr May 2014 #47

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #49

But how could you disagree with Betty Bowers on this topic?? Violet_Crumble May 2014 #88

Okay, but that's not an objective standard. That's your subjective standard. R B Garr May 2014 #132

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #142

people don't get out of shape over BainsBane May 2014 #50

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #59

do you extend that view about BainsBane May 2014 #62

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #65

Consenting adults kcr May 2014 #85

I think that's a bit of a stretch. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #109

That is not the similarity invoked treestar May 2014 #210

Walmart workers get paid minimum wage too BainsBane May 2014 #273

You misunderstood what I wrote. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #276

The issue I have is not their wages BainsBane May 2014 #277

That's fine, and I agree. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #288

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #141

You do it all the time BainsBane May 2014 #272

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #275

In other words BainsBane May 2014 #279

It is the exact same argument BainsBane May 2014 #271

It is always the same argument. kcr May 2014 #280

They also invoke the First Amendment BainsBane May 2014 #281

Oh, but if you mention anything other than a positive light kcr May 2014 #283

"...I do not respect arguments that I strongly believe are advancing a Cleita May 2014 #106

Yes, you've repeated them over and over BainsBane May 2014 #156

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #160

To answer BainsBane May 2014 #165

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #166

You've seen no compelling evidence? BainsBane May 2014 #167

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #169

It may be the gold standard on DU BainsBane May 2014 #180

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #181

No, it doesn't mean no woman ever felt herself too fat BainsBane May 2014 #183

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #252

Gee, you're worked up BainsBane May 2014 #258

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #260

The post was prompted by our conversation BainsBane May 2014 #261

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #262

Then why do you go on about constitutional rights? BainsBane May 2014 #263

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #266

Part of not giving a shit BainsBane May 2014 #267

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #268

You said the SI images were of real women BainsBane May 2014 #269

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #274

The emaciated bodies aren't impossible either BainsBane May 2014 #278

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #285

Most porn actresses tend to be full figured compared to fashion models shaayecanaan May 2014 #284

Excellent post. Evergreen Emerald May 2014 #103

"Most people are fundamentally selfish and entirely unwilling to examine issues... antiquie May 2014 #105

It also completely ignores the roughly half the population Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #110

how then do you explain BainsBane May 2014 #143

Our perceptions of most people differ. antiquie May 2014 #159

I'll agree with that. pintobean May 2014 #162

You describe them as flamebait BainsBane May 2014 #178

Wow. antiquie May 2014 #187

And what makes them flamebait? BainsBane May 2014 #203

~ antiquie May 2014 #208

I figured as much BainsBane May 2014 #259

You should be concerned that women in porn make three times the money as men snooper2 May 2014 #115

now that you have a cause BainsBane May 2014 #144

That's actually kind of surprising treestar May 2014 #212

You're kidding, right? shaayecanaan May 2014 #286

Bookmarking this one. Gidney N Cloyd May 2014 #123

I've yet to hear a good answer on how it's even possible to exploit someone at $10,000 per day Major Nikon May 2014 #40

I could endure a lot of exploitation for $10,000 per day. Orrex May 2014 #108

then, there's the fringe benefits Supersedeas May 2014 #265

More importantly is "So what?"... TreasonousBastard May 2014 #39

This thread is obviously meant to be a snarkfest, but I don't see any way R B Garr May 2014 #45

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #48

Well, they certainly weren't watching porn on the internet R B Garr May 2014 #51

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #58

Have you ever seen pipi_k May 2014 #114

Oh, I know exactly what you mean. R B Garr May 2014 #127

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #249

OMFG. What a pant load. This is about the 3rd WTF as to WTF you are R B Garr May 2014 #253

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #254

LOL. You are not nearly as clever as you think you are. R B Garr May 2014 #255

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #256

Have you ever seen Roman household statuary? It's almost... TreasonousBastard May 2014 #53

This for sure... pipi_k May 2014 #116

I could be wrong, but I seem to remember... TreasonousBastard May 2014 #120

That would be pipi_k May 2014 #124

See, this how these conversations morph. Of course there is interest in women. R B Garr May 2014 #128

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #149

Exactly. treestar May 2014 #133

How so? Orrex May 2014 #136

The man is not there to titillate women treestar May 2014 #209

How can you know this? Did you ask him? Orrex May 2014 #219

It really doesn't show much of him treestar May 2014 #244

Most of that could equally be said about the infamous SI cover Orrex May 2014 #246

I have plenty of naked pics of myself I could post here. hunter May 2014 #8

Sigh. Y'all couldn't handle mine. Warren DeMontague May 2014 #22

I will handle yours, while I am kicking your ass Skittles May 2014 #55

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #60

I knew skittles seemed different... Agschmid May 2014 #81

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #146

Call it a draw! opiate69 May 2014 #153

Really don't know who that is, but, thanks. txwhitedove May 2014 #9

What are these "nude sports" to which you refer? scarletwoman May 2014 #10

I'll tell you when you're old enough Orrex May 2014 #11

Don't be silly. I've played nude sports since 1965. scarletwoman May 2014 #12

I call that a missed opportunity. Orrex May 2014 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #67

Dogs and horses race mostly nude jberryhill May 2014 #13

Dammit you're right! Orrex May 2014 #15

So did the original Olympic athletes! scarletwoman May 2014 #16

Well the girls had to wear short little tunics with one Cleita May 2014 #18

That was just one time jberryhill May 2014 #34

Wasn't that the Super Bowl, not the Olympics. eom Cleita May 2014 #37

So do... pipi_k May 2014 #119

Because they are celebrated Orrex May 2014 #122

And some pipi_k May 2014 #125

I stay away from jean-modified organisms. Orrex May 2014 #126

This one has a lot of young nude photos jberryhill May 2014 #17

Unbridled objectification! Orrex May 2014 #19

Nay! jberryhill May 2014 #23

You are one of the mane instigators on this forum Fumesucker May 2014 #25

That was lame jberryhill May 2014 #29

Don't hold back, just trot it on out Fumesucker May 2014 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #46

I think it behooves us to reurn to more stable modes of discourse Orrex May 2014 #75

Although I was saddled with much cricticism at my original post time RiffRandell May 2014 #235

DUzy! opiate69 May 2014 #245

Worse! Bridled Objectification! kwassa May 2014 #24

When I was 18 to 23 years old I was built like that. Jenoch May 2014 #26

Get in line Prophet 451 May 2014 #43

Oh for heaven's sake Aerows May 2014 #27

I'll take 2, please. Nuclear Unicorn May 2014 #32

how sweet, going to share with Lover Boy, I take it. Generous Soul. Tuesday Afternoon May 2014 #135

What can I say? I'm a giver. Nuclear Unicorn May 2014 #138

Cristiano Ronaldo is a really beautiful man taught_me_patience May 2014 #35

Yum, I'l have both please! n/t Prophet 451 May 2014 #44

Good thing you posted the objectifying photo, then. And the false equivalency. merrily May 2014 #52

You're right. It's completely different. Orrex May 2014 #70

As I just, just saying you don't get it would be so much easier. merrily May 2014 #202

Difference is....this guy IS an athlete (apparently) VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #54

I didn't realize that pintobean May 2014 #72

OH! That changes Everything....this is a FASHION magazine... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #112

So if three topless Olympic athletes danced topless on the beach, Cleita May 2014 #107

At least he has his head. Why Syzygy May 2014 #56

It's kind of refreshing to see him nekkid Warpy May 2014 #57

I agree except for one thing Orrex May 2014 #73

What's the standard for the ass extended outward pose? n/t kcr May 2014 #86

I believe that's the Jim Lee standard Orrex May 2014 #89

I see kcr May 2014 #90

The condescending tone is helpful, too. Orrex May 2014 #92

Hey, you posted the OP kcr May 2014 #93

"There's only one path to understanding." Got it. Orrex May 2014 #102

I completely agree Why Syzygy May 2014 #139

He looks like a southern road crew foreman Warpy May 2014 #96

LOL Orrex May 2014 #98

In other words, it isn't YOUR ox being gored this time, so meh.... nt Romulox May 2014 #101

They asked me first but I turned them down pinboy3niner May 2014 #61

Sad..now we have to settle for this guy. misterhighwasted May 2014 #99

How did you even type the first few words with a straight face??? nt msanthrope May 2014 #129

You must have seen photos of me pinboy3niner May 2014 #131

You too? Rex May 2014 #199

very provocative. wyldwolf May 2014 #71

Sure, he's being objectified. Just like the women on the SI cover. dawg May 2014 #74

Sad that he goes for the pre-pubescent look. (P.S. Look closely--it's a Spanish mag, so there's no WinkyDink May 2014 #76

That SI cover was a long time ago. Did it take you this long (and I notice you had to go global) Squinch May 2014 #77

Yeah, he definitely needed to be posed in a man thong with his ass to the camera. I wonder seaglass May 2014 #79

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #177

I don't know who all the people are who are against it but there is some reason why seaglass May 2014 #206

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #250

Haven't thought about the SI cover-thread for weeks, in fact Orrex May 2014 #83

Not sure how you found snark in my post, because there was none. But let me repeat my points: Squinch May 2014 #173

I was referring to the snark in my OP Orrex May 2014 #176

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #179

Really? Do you even know what sexual objectification IS? alp227 May 2014 #239

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #240

I read your post. Essentially you'd rather the discussion be about empathy instead. alp227 May 2014 #242

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #243

When someone mocks a Walmart customer or dismisses a cop as a pig, Squinch May 2014 #186

I don't accept that it necessarily proceeeds that way. Orrex May 2014 #190

When sexualized imagery is as constant as it is, and when it portrays only one Squinch May 2014 #195

Fiction =/= reality Orrex May 2014 #196

You say, "what about women who don't feel that way." Squinch May 2014 #200

Here's what it is. Here's what it always is: Orrex May 2014 #204

Where and what contexts have you experienced that in? Violet_Crumble May 2014 #205

Violet, your post is very welcomed. Your question, "So whose experience Squinch May 2014 #232

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #175

Yup he is - so is she intaglio May 2014 #78

Ah yes. The old "shut up" refutation. Classy! Orrex May 2014 #97

Yup and she is an exception - but you would be blissfully unaware of that intaglio May 2014 #113

I'd love to be able to pick people's arguments for them, as you do. Orrex May 2014 #117

So why post this ridiculous OP intaglio May 2014 #118

Why do you presume to tell people what they think? Orrex May 2014 #121

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #145

Ah, the MRAs who insist that men are objectified and oppressed intaglio May 2014 #152

I have made no claims about MRAs Orrex May 2014 #154

MRA is the claim when they've got nothing. pintobean May 2014 #157

Oh, not to worry. 99% of us will never be asked to pose naked on the cover of Cleita May 2014 #150

Men objectify Why Syzygy May 2014 #80

Not Sure That's True ProfessorGAC May 2014 #94

I can buy that Why Syzygy May 2014 #140

You guys aren't getting enough bites over at Discussionist? sufrommich May 2014 #82

Who are you talking to? Orrex May 2014 #84

My wife's not so secret crush underpants May 2014 #87

Racists, creationists, teabaggers and MRA's... Ohio Joe May 2014 #91

Which do you think Orrex is? A racist, creationist, teabagger, or MRA? nt msanthrope May 2014 #137

which do you think? Ohio Joe May 2014 #151

I'm asking you, since you brought it up. I'll be happy to share my opinion of Orrex after you tell msanthrope May 2014 #155

ahhh .. you are looking for alert fodder Ohio Joe May 2014 #158

No--I'm looking for you to define what your post meant. nt msanthrope May 2014 #161

I'm pretty sure it was meant as a hit and run Major Nikon May 2014 #163

A hit and run... Where I respond... Several times... Over a few hours... Ohio Joe May 2014 #171

All the name calling with none of the risk, eh? Major Nikon May 2014 #197

Brave... You mean like when an MRA tries to troll people into getting angry? Ohio Joe May 2014 #207

I would never call you a troll or a MRA Major Nikon May 2014 #227

heh... where is this being brave you spoke of? Ohio Joe May 2014 #229

You were brave? Major Nikon May 2014 #233

Whoa--the pressure's on! Orrex May 2014 #164

pfffftt.... Bwahahahahahahaha... Ohio Joe May 2014 #174

well I say..mmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmm & I wish that irrelevant person in the sheet misterhighwasted May 2014 #95

Apparently, we're going with "but that's DIFFERENT!!!1!!!!!" with no followup or explanation. nt Romulox May 2014 #100

I think you might have missed all the posts that said, "Yes, it's exactly the same kind Squinch May 2014 #191

I don't see ANY of the "social justice" brigade throwing a fit, so I'm calling hypocrisy. nt Romulox May 2014 #213

That's nice, dear. Squinch May 2014 #221

Credit where due Orrex May 2014 #222

That poster honestly isn't who I had in mind. I doubt the sincerity of others on this issue. nt Romulox May 2014 #223

Fair enough (eom) Orrex May 2014 #224

Ditto with your 'Granted' sentence. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #104

Futbol (soccer) I believe. eom Cleita May 2014 #111

Correct. Lizzie Poppet May 2014 #168

Oh, very easy on the eyes. Cleita May 2014 #170

He's European, this is in Spain and she's had an "objectifying" boob job. libdem4life May 2014 #130

I wonder if the bank felt objectified, when those two took their big fat checks there for Cleita May 2014 #172

They don't look at the pictures...they buy it for the articles. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #134

Thought you meant this one....... whistler162 May 2014 #182

If this post is meant to somehow imply that concern over the objectification of women Maedhros May 2014 #184

Nope. Orrex May 2014 #185

I would have a hard time believing that men are as objectified as women, Maedhros May 2014 #189

Objectification takes many forms Orrex May 2014 #192

What's he got that I ain't got? Eleanors38 May 2014 #188

Well, if both genders are being equally objectified now, Lunacee_2013 May 2014 #193

I don't get to see them very often! Rosa Luxemburg May 2014 #194

I see what you did there! Rex May 2014 #198

There are half naked young, handsome men in women's fashion Cleita May 2014 #201

Different. Different. DIFFERENT!!!1!1!!!. (You are also "anti-intellectual" for noticing.) nt Romulox May 2014 #217

It IS different, now for my amazing reason as to why... Rex May 2014 #238

It is different. Those magazines are trying to sell fashion treestar May 2014 #287

What fashion is the nude man pintobean May 2014 #289

Heck, I don't know treestar May 2014 #290

Four red crayon check marks is very impressive for a DUer. Rex May 2014 #237

Funny that a certain group didn't post this op.... NCTraveler May 2014 #211

They've DOMINATED this board with whining about THIS VERY issue. Now radio silence? nt Romulox May 2014 #214

This anti-intellectual shit stirring op is proof that they alone do not..... NCTraveler May 2014 #215

"Anti-intellectual"? Um, no. Just a functional memory of last week. nt Romulox May 2014 #216

Thanks for pointing out the blatantly obvious to the deliberately obtuse. Tuesday Afternoon May 2014 #218

+1. And as usual, they are in a race to the bottom. n/t R B Garr May 2014 #225

what makes it even more ironically hilarious is the post below this one. Tuesday Afternoon May 2014 #228

I noticed that, too. R B Garr May 2014 #236

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #248

Seems they have been replaced by dumb and dumber. n/t Cleita May 2014 #220

No, no pintobean May 2014 #231

That woman needs to move out of the way mwrguy May 2014 #226

I'd like to have her move 6 inches to her left LaurenG May 2014 #230

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2014 #241

Nice one LaurenG May 2014 #247

Only five? Orrex May 2014 #251

Just trying to be realistic. LaurenG May 2014 #257

I just noticed this thread today after returning home RiffRandell May 2014 #234

... with a sexy woman draped over him like a scarf wickerwoman May 2014 #270

I just think it is a stunning photo of two gorgeous people. alphafemale May 2014 #282

Diego Simeone and Athletico are about to undress and expose C.Ronaldo completely later today Blue_Tires May 2014 #291

Oh my In_The_Wind May 2014 #292