Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jmowreader

(53,323 posts)

8. You will notice it doesn't say HOW MUCH property you'd have to own

Reply to DonViejo (Original post)

Tue May 20, 2014, 02:21 PM

May 2014

I'm pretty sure some enterprising liberal who owns a large piece of rural land could subdivide his or her runoff pond into business-size plots and sell deeds to it for a buck apiece.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

GOPer Suggested Voting Should Be Limited To Property Owners [View all] DonViejo May 2014 OP

Holy crap. gollygee May 2014 #1

Yet another reason for South Florida to secede from North Florida superpatriotman May 2014 #2

global warming will take care of florida leftyohiolib May 2014 #4

And yet they deny they are in favor of voter suppression? LOL reformist2 May 2014 #3

They misspelled his name again. KamaAina May 2014 #5

That was my first thought, too Brother Buzz May 2014 #6

Hello, Mr. Strauss? Brigid May 2014 #7

You will notice it doesn't say HOW MUCH property you'd have to own jmowreader May 2014 #8

Define property Kber May 2014 #10

When they say property they mean "real" property, which means land and/or buildings jmowreader May 2014 #11

The GOP wants to limit voting Gothmog May 2014 #9

Vote by Mail is a travesty? How will soldiers vote then? ErikJ May 2014 #12

This is always what they have wanted. nt ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2014 #13

Praised Rick Scott ... lpbk2713 May 2014 #14