Anything you'd like to know about Fukushima?

[FBaggins]

65. You aren't?

I follow the science wherever it leads.

No you don't. You run far afield of reality and somehow convince yourself that the unicorn you're following is "science".

Let's review the most recent evidence, shall we?

Radiation is a likely cause of the sea star wasting.

Radiation is in no sense a "likely cause".

Radiation has been present in the pacific for a long time. There have been several wasting events over the years.

Radiation has been present all over the world for as long as there have been sea stars. There's no difference between the "man-made" radiation and the natural radiation... except that the natural stuff is there in far larger amounts. If those levels of radiation were dangerous to sea stars... they never would have evolved in the first place.

There's no correlation at all between levels of man-made radiation and prior wasting events. The most obvious example being Fukushima... where the water off the coast saw significant (if temporary) increases in "man-made radiation" (particularly on the sea floor) - yet there are no reported wasting events off Japan (or that side of the Pacific).

Radiation from manmade nuclear events has not been ruled out by anyone but science deniers.

What cleverly-worded BS. They haven't ruled out little green men in UFOs either.

Radiation from manmade nuclear events (or any other source) has not been ruled-in by any scientist. Not one.

Yet you think "the science" says that it's a likely cause?