Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jeff47

(26,549 posts)

10. Yes, it's really tragic that time has stopped

Reply to AceAcme (Reply #9)

Wed May 21, 2014, 12:04 PM

May 2014

and nothing new ever will be developed. We're stuck with one approved crop. It's utterly impossible to approve any other crop. And it's utterly impossible for anyone else to develop another crop.

56,000 papers have apparently not convinced the USDA.

Science takes more than one paper. So does USDA approval.

Anti-science: It's not just for Republicans!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Great Day For Sustainability!: Rural Oregon voters back ban on GMO crops amid U.S. labeling uproar [View all] kpete May 2014 OP

"Opponents conceded defeat but said the debate would continue." Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #1

The tide is turning. The people are speaking. Corporations better listen. AceAcme May 2014 #2

Uhhhh jeff47 May 2014 #3

Have you ever seen a monsanto seed? kpete May 2014 #4

Let me quote my first two sentences, since you apparently didn't bother to read them. jeff47 May 2014 #5

i did read them kpete May 2014 #8

"they are purple and perfectly round " ag_dude May 2014 #17

Got a link for this 'drought tolerance' claim, Jeff? I don't think so. AceAcme May 2014 #6

Here's about 56,000 scientific papers jeff47 May 2014 #7

Only one (1) is USDA approved and being planted. It is Monsanto. And their claims are feeble. AceAcme May 2014 #9

Yes, it's really tragic that time has stopped jeff47 May 2014 #10

I'm definitely in the pro-science camp. Just not the corporate "research" camp. AceAcme May 2014 #12

Again, GMO is not the same as Monsanto jeff47 May 2014 #13

Bwaa ha ha ha. Your Strawmen arguments are fatally feeble. Probably from eating GMO crud. AceAcme May 2014 #14

What study have you found that indicates GMO's have any impact on intellect? ag_dude May 2014 #19

They are right there on the library shelf right next to the studies proving that... AceAcme May 2014 #20

Sorry, didn't see an actual joke. ag_dude May 2014 #23

Tip: When making a claim like "statements I didn't make" jeff47 May 2014 #29

UCD & Monsanto are not working independently, they are one and the same. calikid May 2014 #30

Some are, some aren't. jeff47 May 2014 #31

There are literally thousands of peer reviewed studies ag_dude May 2014 #18

Right on time-big Ag defenders roody May 2014 #28

Good for Oregon! Le Taz Hot May 2014 #11

How peculiar. Disappeared debate. 10 posts 'disappeared' from thread. What's up with that? AceAcme May 2014 #15

Ignore disappears sub-threads, it's not like a Hide. nt bemildred May 2014 #25

Momentum building: Bill requiring labeling of genetically modified foods advances in Massachusetts AceAcme May 2014 #16

...and people say the right has a monopoly on being anti-science. Donald Ian Rankin May 2014 #21

The left loves & embraces science, but wisely disdains corporate "science" AceAcme May 2014 #22

Then what explains the anti-GMO view of so many on the left? ag_dude May 2014 #24

I'd bet the SHOVE-IT-DOWN-YOUR-THROAT-WITHOUT-YOUR-KNOWLEDGE stance of the corporations is a factor AceAcme May 2014 #26

Which of the "great many studies" did you find most alarming? ag_dude May 2014 #27