Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ag_dude

(562 posts)
27. Which of the "great many studies" did you find most alarming?
Wed May 21, 2014, 07:52 PM
May 2014
not to mention the great many studies that show GMO harm to the environment, to farm animals, as well as the highly suspicious onslaught of degenerative diseases that have afflicted human beings in greatly increased rates of incidence since the surreptitious introduction of GMO foods against public will. That's my 2 cents worth of an answer.


Which ones stick out to you the most?

Please don’t fall into the clichéd anti-GMO “look them up yourself” narrative, it’s such a bore. That’s what people say when they don’t actually know what they are referencing.

Frankly, I realize you’re not going to cite a “great many studies” because there simply aren’t a “great many studies” that show anything resembling the problems you cited relative to the overwhelming scientific consensus on the subject that goes back 2+ decades.

But there are probably a lot of other factors as well. Do all the studies you refer to conclude that concern over GMOs is unfounded? NO. Not at all. But if you are sincerely interested in knowing a complete answer to your question, you'll have to do your own research. Different people have different reasons, and most of them are valid.


I’ve done quite a bit of research on it, read probably 50 of the actual studies myself. Not propaganda websites, actual studies.

One of the better reviews of a large numbers of studies is “An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research.” The abstract can be found on Pubmed and you can find copies of its original text as well as an xls file with the 1,700+ papers they analyzed on any number of websites by simply typing in the name of the review itself.

The abstract…

The technology to produce genetically engineered (GE) plants is celebrating its 30th anniversary and one of the major achievements has been the development of GE crops. The safety of GE crops is crucial for their adoption and has been the object of intense research work often ignored in the public debate. We have reviewed the scientific literature on GE crop safety during the last 10 years, built a classified and manageable list of scientific papers, and analyzed the distribution and composition of the published literature. We selected original research papers, reviews, relevant opinions and reports addressing all the major issues that emerged in the debate on GE crops, trying to catch the scientific consensus that has matured since GE plants became widely cultivated worldwide. The scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazards directly connected with the use of GE crops; however, the debate is still intense. An improvement in the efficacy of scientific communication could have a significant impact on the future of agricultural GE. Our collection of scientific records is available to researchers, communicators and teachers at all levels to help create an informed, balanced public perception on the important issue of GE use in agriculture.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Opponents conceded defeat but said the debate would continue." Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #1
The tide is turning. The people are speaking. Corporations better listen. AceAcme May 2014 #2
Uhhhh jeff47 May 2014 #3
Have you ever seen a monsanto seed? kpete May 2014 #4
Let me quote my first two sentences, since you apparently didn't bother to read them. jeff47 May 2014 #5
i did read them kpete May 2014 #8
"they are purple and perfectly round " ag_dude May 2014 #17
Got a link for this 'drought tolerance' claim, Jeff? I don't think so. AceAcme May 2014 #6
Here's about 56,000 scientific papers jeff47 May 2014 #7
Only one (1) is USDA approved and being planted. It is Monsanto. And their claims are feeble. AceAcme May 2014 #9
Yes, it's really tragic that time has stopped jeff47 May 2014 #10
I'm definitely in the pro-science camp. Just not the corporate "research" camp. AceAcme May 2014 #12
Again, GMO is not the same as Monsanto jeff47 May 2014 #13
Bwaa ha ha ha. Your Strawmen arguments are fatally feeble. Probably from eating GMO crud. AceAcme May 2014 #14
What study have you found that indicates GMO's have any impact on intellect? ag_dude May 2014 #19
They are right there on the library shelf right next to the studies proving that... AceAcme May 2014 #20
Sorry, didn't see an actual joke. ag_dude May 2014 #23
Tip: When making a claim like "statements I didn't make" jeff47 May 2014 #29
UCD & Monsanto are not working independently, they are one and the same. calikid May 2014 #30
Some are, some aren't. jeff47 May 2014 #31
There are literally thousands of peer reviewed studies ag_dude May 2014 #18
Right on time-big Ag defenders roody May 2014 #28
Good for Oregon! Le Taz Hot May 2014 #11
How peculiar. Disappeared debate. 10 posts 'disappeared' from thread. What's up with that? AceAcme May 2014 #15
Ignore disappears sub-threads, it's not like a Hide. nt bemildred May 2014 #25
Momentum building: Bill requiring labeling of genetically modified foods advances in Massachusetts AceAcme May 2014 #16
...and people say the right has a monopoly on being anti-science. Donald Ian Rankin May 2014 #21
The left loves & embraces science, but wisely disdains corporate "science" AceAcme May 2014 #22
Then what explains the anti-GMO view of so many on the left? ag_dude May 2014 #24
I'd bet the SHOVE-IT-DOWN-YOUR-THROAT-WITHOUT-YOUR-KNOWLEDGE stance of the corporations is a factor AceAcme May 2014 #26
Which of the "great many studies" did you find most alarming? ag_dude May 2014 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Great Day For Sustainabil...»Reply #27