Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Great Day For Sustainability!: Rural Oregon voters back ban on GMO crops amid U.S. labeling uproar [View all]ag_dude
(562 posts)27. Which of the "great many studies" did you find most alarming?
not to mention the great many studies that show GMO harm to the environment, to farm animals, as well as the highly suspicious onslaught of degenerative diseases that have afflicted human beings in greatly increased rates of incidence since the surreptitious introduction of GMO foods against public will. That's my 2 cents worth of an answer.
Which ones stick out to you the most?
Please dont fall into the clichéd anti-GMO look them up yourself narrative, its such a bore. Thats what people say when they dont actually know what they are referencing.
Frankly, I realize youre not going to cite a great many studies because there simply arent a great many studies that show anything resembling the problems you cited relative to the overwhelming scientific consensus on the subject that goes back 2+ decades.
But there are probably a lot of other factors as well. Do all the studies you refer to conclude that concern over GMOs is unfounded? NO. Not at all. But if you are sincerely interested in knowing a complete answer to your question, you'll have to do your own research. Different people have different reasons, and most of them are valid.
Ive done quite a bit of research on it, read probably 50 of the actual studies myself. Not propaganda websites, actual studies.
One of the better reviews of a large numbers of studies is An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. The abstract can be found on Pubmed and you can find copies of its original text as well as an xls file with the 1,700+ papers they analyzed on any number of websites by simply typing in the name of the review itself.
The abstract
The technology to produce genetically engineered (GE) plants is celebrating its 30th anniversary and one of the major achievements has been the development of GE crops. The safety of GE crops is crucial for their adoption and has been the object of intense research work often ignored in the public debate. We have reviewed the scientific literature on GE crop safety during the last 10 years, built a classified and manageable list of scientific papers, and analyzed the distribution and composition of the published literature. We selected original research papers, reviews, relevant opinions and reports addressing all the major issues that emerged in the debate on GE crops, trying to catch the scientific consensus that has matured since GE plants became widely cultivated worldwide. The scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazards directly connected with the use of GE crops; however, the debate is still intense. An improvement in the efficacy of scientific communication could have a significant impact on the future of agricultural GE. Our collection of scientific records is available to researchers, communicators and teachers at all levels to help create an informed, balanced public perception on the important issue of GE use in agriculture.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Great Day For Sustainability!: Rural Oregon voters back ban on GMO crops amid U.S. labeling uproar [View all]
kpete
May 2014
OP
Let me quote my first two sentences, since you apparently didn't bother to read them.
jeff47
May 2014
#5
Only one (1) is USDA approved and being planted. It is Monsanto. And their claims are feeble.
AceAcme
May 2014
#9
I'm definitely in the pro-science camp. Just not the corporate "research" camp.
AceAcme
May 2014
#12
Bwaa ha ha ha. Your Strawmen arguments are fatally feeble. Probably from eating GMO crud.
AceAcme
May 2014
#14
They are right there on the library shelf right next to the studies proving that...
AceAcme
May 2014
#20
How peculiar. Disappeared debate. 10 posts 'disappeared' from thread. What's up with that?
AceAcme
May 2014
#15
Momentum building: Bill requiring labeling of genetically modified foods advances in Massachusetts
AceAcme
May 2014
#16