Anything you'd like to know about Fukushima?

[NuclearDem]

144. Oh not this again.

There is science that details as false everything you have claimed.

What exactly would that be? That fission power and nuclear weapons are dangerous to human health, the environment, and life as we know it?

Or are you saying there's evidence that the laundry list of bogus claims I rattled off in the last paragraph are indeed false? Because you would be 100% right about that.

You have not presented any evidence. You can easily post an OP detailing your evidence, but you don't.

I'm not posting anything about fission power or nuclear weapons because as far as issues go, anti-nuclear advocacy is fairly low on the ladder of topics I feel are important to address.

Situationally, as in say, when the START treaty was up for renewal, I absolutely discussed it.

You just are not credible. You say that you believe nukes are bad but every time someone posts how bad nukes are, you set off running around with your hair on fire.

I point out how your attempts to link every ecological disaster to Fukushima are ridiculous, and how bad you're making the rest of the anti-nuclear movement look with claims like that. You are not the paragon of anti-nuclear. In fact, you're doing more to damage the movement than the industry could have ever dreamed to do by making us all look like hysterics who don't have a firm grasp of biology, chemistry, or physics.

All you've managed to accomplish here is unite pro-nuclear and anti-nuclear posters in their annoyance at your claims.