Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(126,323 posts)
2. Although Conyers seems to have collectede enough signatures of registered voters
Thu May 22, 2014, 11:24 AM
May 2014

to qualify for the ballot, Michigan law further requires that the petition-circulators themselves be registered voters, and Conyers fell afoul of this requirement

The state does have a suitable interest, in ensuring that enough registered voters support placing a candidate on the ballot, before the candidate is added to the ballot -- for otherwise, it is quite plausible that the ballot could run to many pages of pseudo-candidates for whom there was no measurable support

What is in question, as I understand it, is whether requiring petition-circulators to be registered voters: the argument against the requirement is that it unduly burdens political expression (expressed through the act of circulating petitions), without there being a suitable government interest justifying the burden

Courts have, in the past, taken the view, that requiring petition-circulators to be registered voters unduly burdens freedom of political expression, so this argument is not a recent sudden novelty imagined by Conyers and his lawyers

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal judge to decide C...»Reply #2