Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Former Spy Valerie Plame Thinks Hillary Clinton is A lot Like FDR [View all]BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)56. That's already in the PPACA. No need for Hillary to restart a Teabagger fight for something that
already is.
The State Innovation Medicaid Waiver section of the ACA provides States the option to have single-payer - and the Federal Gov't will fund the largest part of the costs of implementation (it's crazy expensive to install and that's the reason why States have, heretofore, decided against implementation).
State innovation waivers. One of the two final regulations implements section 1332 of the ACA, which permits states to apply to HHS and to the Department of the Treasury for innovation waivers to implement state-specific health reform approaches that vary from certain ACA requirements. The specific provisions of the ACA that can be waived include the provisions relating to qualified health plans (including the essential health benefits package), the exchanges, premium tax credits, cost-sharing reduction payments, the minimum coverage requirement (individual mandate), and the employer responsibility requirements. If a state is granted a waiver, the state can fund its reforms through the aggregate amount of federal funding that otherwise would have been paid out within the state for premium tax credits, cost-reduction payments, and small business tax credits.
To qualify for an innovation waiver, the state must establish that its reform plan would provide coverage that:
Is at least as comprehensive as ACA coverage,
Is at least as affordable as ACA coverage,
Covers at least as many residents as the ACA would have covered, and
Will not increase the federal deficit.
To qualify for an innovation waiver, the state must establish that its reform plan would provide coverage that:
Is at least as comprehensive as ACA coverage,
Is at least as affordable as ACA coverage,
Covers at least as many residents as the ACA would have covered, and
Will not increase the federal deficit.
Single-payer will do all of that and then some (although many young people will not like single-payer since they'll be paying the same as older people who need health services more than they).
This is what Vermont is using in order to implement their single-payer system beginning 2016. It appears that in order for Americans to get a single-payer system set up, they'll have to do it via their States - much like legalizing MJ and full civil rights for the LGBT communities.
Thank you, President Obama!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
147 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why Former Spy Valerie Plame Thinks Hillary Clinton is A lot Like FDR [View all]
ProSense
May 2014
OP
Rove was in deep and very likely committed perjury about it. He claims a faulty memory
yellowcanine
May 2014
#133
And I just posted the story of a woman who is trying to Unionize at Walmart whose mother
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#89
Yes...tightwads are not the worst people in the world....HOWEVER.....the Walton brats...
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#93
Then you agree...Walmart is entirely a different beast since Sam Walton died....
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#95
Personally, I think Wal-Mart started going downhill around 1973 or 74, if not earlier
Art_from_Ark
May 2014
#120
I dunno. Did FDR ever make a mistake? Like, was he a mortal man with feet of clay?
Hekate
May 2014
#101
what an incredibly ugly attack on Plame. She was an expert on nuclear counter-proliferation,
hlthe2b
May 2014
#9
nope, because it's dismissive of females and something many women deal with, just yesterday
JI7
May 2014
#14
you dismissed her based on her looks, why mention her looks at all ? she can be intelligent and
JI7
May 2014
#17
That is not at issue. You can disagree with Plame's comparison without the vicious attack on Plame
hlthe2b
May 2014
#18
that is not fair. So because she disagrees with you on Hillary you imply she is dumb?
hrmjustin
May 2014
#19
If she honestly believes Hillary is like FDR, yes, she is not very bright.
closeupready
May 2014
#25
She wouldn't be the first person I've ever met who was well-qualified in their area
winter is coming
May 2014
#27
Maybe that's just her opinion-what's wrong with that? We all have them. nt
babylonsister
May 2014
#82
No matter how you slice it....still not Republican! or even Moderate...
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#140
On the contrary, she's a right-wing authoritarian, here are more accurate charts
bananas
May 2014
#146
and where are ALL her speeches and votes to support this bullshit contention as MY graph has? hmmm??
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#147
All I can say is I sure hope so. I'll support her if she wins the nomination,
closeupready
May 2014
#135
In the terminolgy used by the Head of the CIA under Oath, she was a "Covert Agent"
Bandit
May 2014
#13
LOL VanRhap. You're gonna make the anti-Hillary crowd wince and weep with your facts.
BlueCaliDem
May 2014
#42
Comparing Hillary to FDR is kinda like comparing a stale Twinkie to 10 course banquet.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#32
She's a war mongering, money grubbing, corporatist, populist liberal.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#58
She accepts payoffs from corporations. How does that fit in with the above?
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#108
I'll be voting for the most progressive, anti-war, candidate on the ballot.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#121
I have always voted for the most Liberal Dem candidate..that is why I voted for Hillary Clinton
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#122
aaaaaaannnnnddddd you think a President Elizabeth Warren or President Bernie Sanders
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#102
Valerie and her husband are actual heroes, patriots, shit most of us know nothing
randys1
May 2014
#36
Would love to believe that, for me she would have to raise top tax rates back to Nixon days, for one
randys1
May 2014
#43
Its true read the site...her speeches and voting record is right there....
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#46
Again, to me a liberal would raise tax rates, probably do some protectionism with trade, etc
randys1
May 2014
#47
OK, you win...I will work for her campaign regardless, but until you raise taxes
randys1
May 2014
#51
That's already in the PPACA. No need for Hillary to restart a Teabagger fight for something that
BlueCaliDem
May 2014
#56
Not sure this is true. She voted "yes" for Iraq. He voted yes for "Afghanistan". That makes them
McCamy Taylor
May 2014
#66
I read it. But a comparison to FDR is always a "parental" one. He was "dad". Meaning Hillary
McCamy Taylor
May 2014
#67
FDR ( personal hero of mine) was certainly flawed : SC stack attempt; internment camps, etc. ...
AzDar
May 2014
#71
"...I posted it because she said it and I came across it." And I'll grant you, that's a fair cop.
scarletwoman
May 2014
#145