Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In response to Michael Kinsley's anti-journalism review of Greenwald book [View all]joshcryer
(62,536 posts)35. What impact? What changes?
Please. Carters FISA courts got empowered by this crap.
Wyden did not hold Clapper in contempt because his question was rhetorical, he knew the answer. Clapper later corrected the record after consulting his lawyers. Unlike Wyden he couldn't rely on congressional immunity.
Wyden hasn't revealed anything because it's not as horrible as the checkbook journalism pretends.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In response to Michael Kinsley's anti-journalism review of Greenwald book [View all]
grasswire
May 2014
OP
I will bet you that I can guess the name of the country that Greenwald is about to expose
Aerows
May 2014
#8
ALL wealthy journalists should be hung by the neck until they are dead!!!!!!
Major Hogwash
May 2014
#70
Indeed. Let's look backward instead of forward. Except when it is convenient to look
Luminous Animal
May 2014
#56
Ron Wyden has been a sniveler for years. Only hinting at gross violations. Never delivering.
Luminous Animal
May 2014
#64
Wyden already knew what Snowden knew but didn't reveal shit. He sniveled Showden delivered.
Luminous Animal
May 2014
#66
Show me one single thing that Wyden ever did to fix it other than whine about it.
Luminous Animal
May 2014
#68
Now Greenwald's sycophants want there to be no consequences for breaking the law?
baldguy
May 2014
#15
"Our people, merely for want of intelligence which they may rely on, are become lethargic
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#16
He got that right, that's why there wasn't much laughter, what he said was the truth.
sabrina 1
May 2014
#26
oh, they dig a free press, as long as it doesn't tell the truth about thier fave politico
KG
May 2014
#28
Kinsley's opinion is trusted based on what? He is pro-austerity measures,how fucking dumb is that?
Jefferson23
May 2014
#34
It also thinks that it is A-OK to dump toxic waste on poor countries because they get paid for
Luminous Animal
May 2014
#40
Wonderful. He is a self proclaimed liberal?? Who the hell does he think he's fooling?
Jefferson23
May 2014
#49
I don't actually recall him or the show..but from what I have read so far, his
Jefferson23
May 2014
#75