Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yellowcanine

(36,799 posts)
133. Rove was in deep and very likely committed perjury about it. He claims a faulty memory
Fri May 23, 2014, 09:45 AM
May 2014

and he managed to convince Fitzgerald of that, apparently - but who really believes that Rove would not remember a conversation about Valerie Plame with a reporter (Cooper)? According to an email, Rove even discussed the conversation he had with Cooper with Steven Hadley. Also Chris Matthews claims that Rove told him that Plame was "fair game." Who you going to believe? Rove clearly lied a number of times about how much he knew about Plame and his role in getting the story out to reporters. Plame's role in the CIA was classified. Rove confirmed the CIA connection to Novak and at the least discussed Plame with Matthews and Cooper. For that alone he should have been prosecuted. And then there is the likely perjury as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plame_affair
In July 2005, it was revealed that Karl Rove was Novak's second Bush administration source.[67]

In his grand jury testimony, Rove testified he learned of Plame's CIA affiliation from journalists and not from government officials. Rove testified that Novak called him in July 2003 to discuss a story unrelated to Plame or Wilson. Eventually, according to Rove, Novak told him he planned to report in an upcoming column that Plame worked for the CIA. Rove told the grand jury that by the time Novak had called him, he had already learned of Plame from other reporters, but that he could not recall which reporters had told him. When Novak inquired about Wilson's wife working for the CIA, Rove indicated he had heard something like that, according to the source's recounting of the grand jury testimony for the Associated Press. Rove told the grand jury that three days later, he had a phone conversation with Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper and, in an effort to discredit some of Wilson's allegations, informally told Cooper that he believed Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, though he never used her name. Rove also testified to the grand jury that he had heard from Libby that Plame worked for the CIA. Rove testified that Libby told him that he heard the information from journalists.[68][69]

The indictment of Libby states: "On or about July 10 or July 11, 2003, LIBBY spoke to a senior official in the White House ("Official A&quot who advised LIBBY of a conversation Official A had earlier that week with columnist Robert Novak in which Wilson’s wife was discussed as a CIA employee involved in Wilson’s trip. LIBBY was advised by Official A that Novak would be writing a story about Wilson’s wife." Though never confirmed by Fitzgerald, it has been reported that Rove was "Official A."[70][71]

Shortly after the publication of Novak's article, Rove also reportedly called Chris Matthews and told him off the record that "Wilson's wife is fair game."[30][72]

On July 2, 2005, Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, confirmed that Rove spoke to Time reporter Matt Cooper "three or four days" before Plame's identity was first revealed in print by commentator Robert Novak. Cooper's article in Time, citing unnamed and anonymous "government officials," confirmed Plame to be a "CIA official who monitors the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction." Cooper's article appeared three days after Novak's column was published. Rove's lawyer asserted that Rove "never knowingly disclosed classified information" and that "he did not tell any reporter that Valerie Plame worked for the CIA."[73][74][75] Luskin also has said that his client did not initiate conversations with reporters about Plame and did not encourage reporters to write about her.[76]

Initially, Rove failed to tell the grand jury about his conversations with Cooper. According to Rove, he only remembered he had spoken to Cooper after discovering a July 11, 2003, White House e-mail that Rove had written to then-deputy National Security advisor Stephen J. Hadley in which Rove said he had spoken to Cooper about the Niger controversy. Luskin also testified before the grand jury. He told prosecutors that Time reporter Viveca Novak had told him prior to Rove's first grand jury appearance that she had heard from colleagues at Time that Rove was one of the sources for Cooper's story about Plame. Luskin in turn said that he told Rove about this, though Rove still did not disclose to the grand jury that he had ever spoken to Cooper about Plame. Viveca Novak testified she couldn't recall when she spoke to Luskin. Rove testified a total of five times before the federal grand jury investigating the leak. After Rove's last appearance, Luskin released a statement that read in part: "In connection with this appearance, the special counsel has advised Mr. Rove that he is not a target of the investigation. Mr. Fitzgerald has affirmed that he has made no decision concerning charges."[69][77]

On July 11, 2006, Novak confirmed that Rove was his second source for his article that revealed the identity of Plame as a CIA agent, the source who confirmed what Armitage had told him.[78]

On February 12, 2007, Novak testified in Libby's trial. As Michael J. Sniffen of the Associated Press reports: "Novak testified he got confirmation from White House political adviser Karl Rove, who replied to him: 'Oh, you've heard that, too.' "[79]

Court documents reveal that in December 2004, Fitzgerald was considering pursuing perjury charges against Rove.[80][81]

On July 8, 2007, Rove spoke publicly about the investigation at the Aspen Ideas Festival question-and-answer session. Rove told the audience "My contribution to this was to say to a reporter, which is a lesson about talking to reporters, the words 'I heard that too,'...Remember, the underlying offense of Armitage talking to Novak was no violation. There was no indictment."[82][83]

On August 19, 2007, Rove was asked by David Gregory on Meet the Press about whether Rove considered Plame to be "fair game". Rove replied "No. And you know what? Fair game, that wasn’t my phrase. That’s a phrase of a journalist. In fact, a colleague of yours."[84] Rove has not denied he had a conversation with Matthews. Newsweek reported in October 2003 that a source familiar with Rove's side of the conversation told Newsweek that Rove told Matthews it was "reasonable to discuss who sent [Joe] Wilson to Niger."[85]

After announcing his resignation from the Bush Administration, Rove appeared on Fox News Sunday and Meet the Press, and discussed his role in the Plame affair. According to Rove, he didn't believe he was a confirming source for Robert Novak and Matt Cooper with regard to Plame. Rove also reiterated that he first learned of Plame from another reporter, though would not disclose which reporter. Rove told Gregory "I acted in an appropriate manner, made all the appropriate individuals aware of my contact. I met with the FBI right at the beginning of this, told them everything. You’re right, the special prosecutor declined to take any action at all. I was never a target." Rove told Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday "I didn't know her name, didn't know her status at the CIA."[84][86]

In his memoir, Courage and Consequence, Rove devotes three chapters to Wilson's NY Times op-ed and subsequent grand jury investigation. Rove writes that before his third appearance before the grand jury, Robert Luskin went back and looked through all of Rove's saved emails from April through September 2003. Luskin, according to Rove, uncovered an email Rove had written to Steve Hadley in which Rove discussed a conversation he had had with Matt Cooper concerning Wilson's op-ed. Rove writes that while the "email didn't jog any better recollection of the call", he immediately told Fitzgerald, after being sworn in, that he wanted to "set the record straight." After presenting the email to Fitzgerald, Rove writes that "it was as if I'd detonated a bomb in the shabby little room." Rove writes that before his fourth appearance before the grand jury he received a "target warning" by Fitzgerald. Rove describes his fourth appearance as "brutal from the first moment," and that the grand jury "hung on Fitzgerald's every word." After Rove's testimony, Fitzgerald told Luskin "All things being equal, we are inclined to indict your client." According to Rove, Luskin and Fitzgerald meet for hours in Chicago on October 20 to discuss the matter. At some point during the meeting, "Fitzgerald turned to what was really bothering him: my conversation with Matt Cooper. Was I lying about not being able to recall my phone conversation with him the morning of July 11, 2003?" Specifically, Rove writes, Fitzgerald wanted to know why "in December 2003 or January 2004 did I ask my aides...to find any evidence of contact with Matt Cooper." It was at this moment, according to Rove, that Luskin revealed his conversation with Viveca Novak in which Luskin learned that Cooper "had insisted around Time's Washington bureau that he had talked to [Rove about Plame]." Luskin then revealed to Fitzgerald that it was he who instructed Rove to have his aides find any records of that contact. According to Rove, Fitzgerald was "stunned", and stated to Luskin, "You rocked my world." Rove writes that it "was clear Fitzgerald had originally intended to indict Libby and me on the same day." Rove also writes that in the end, Luskin had a "charitable view of Fitzgerald...the prosecutor never leaked, and he treated Luskin with respect and was forthcoming about his evidence and concerns."[87]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kick for ProSense May 2014 #1
Karl Rove should have gone to prison for what he did to Valerie Plame. yellowcanine May 2014 #21
+10,000,000 randys1 May 2014 #28
Plus infinity. McCamy Taylor May 2014 #65
It was actually Richard Armitage who "outed" Plame. Nye Bevan May 2014 #127
Rove was in deep and very likely committed perjury about it. He claims a faulty memory yellowcanine May 2014 #133
OUCH. That's gotta hurt some anti-Hillary peeps around here. BlueCaliDem May 2014 #2
Not hurting me. Of course, I am not anti yellowcanine May 2014 #22
Not in the least. The thought of another President Clinton... WorseBeforeBetter May 2014 #76
Did FDR work for Walmart, too? Octafish May 2014 #3
I don't know did FDR work for Sam Walton or his brats? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #30
I doubt it. I do know Ms. Clinton did. Octafish May 2014 #61
Yeah when Sam owned it.... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #73
It was heading that way even when Sam was in charge Art_from_Ark May 2014 #80
How can you even say that....ridic VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #81
I can say that because I was there Art_from_Ark May 2014 #83
are you there now to be able to tell the difference? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #84
I still keep in touch with people who work there Art_from_Ark May 2014 #86
And I just posted the story of a woman who is trying to Unionize at Walmart whose mother VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #89
You're talking Sam's, I'm talking Wal-Mart Art_from_Ark May 2014 #90
sam thing...and here is another... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #91
Like I said, it has been evolutionary Art_from_Ark May 2014 #92
Yes...tightwads are not the worst people in the world....HOWEVER.....the Walton brats... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #93
I tend to agree about the "Walton brats" Art_from_Ark May 2014 #94
Then you agree...Walmart is entirely a different beast since Sam Walton died.... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #95
It's certainly an entirely different beast Art_from_Ark May 2014 #96
until Sam Walmart died....then all bets were off. VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #103
Personally, I think Wal-Mart started going downhill around 1973 or 74, if not earlier Art_from_Ark May 2014 #120
I dunno. Did FDR ever make a mistake? Like, was he a mortal man with feet of clay? Hekate May 2014 #101
Feet of clay is one thing. Integrity is another. Octafish May 2014 #132
This message was self-deleted by its author joshcryer May 2014 #113
She didn't work "for" Wal-Mart. Beacool May 2014 #115
No BS at all: Hers was a paid position on the board. Octafish May 2014 #134
I'm not a fan of Wal-Mart's, Beacool May 2014 #138
OMG. That comparison is downright offensive. closeupready May 2014 #4
Or for being a spy outed by Cheney and his assistants. JoePhilly May 2014 #6
what an incredibly ugly attack on Plame. She was an expert on nuclear counter-proliferation, hlthe2b May 2014 #9
FDR created the New Deal; the Clintons have cooperated in dismantling it. closeupready May 2014 #10
nope, because it's dismissive of females and something many women deal with, just yesterday JI7 May 2014 #14
Nope. Greenwald was right? closeupready May 2014 #16
you dismissed her based on her looks, why mention her looks at all ? she can be intelligent and JI7 May 2014 #17
Ha! Iggo May 2014 #59
That is not at issue. You can disagree with Plame's comparison without the vicious attack on Plame hlthe2b May 2014 #18
that is not fair. So because she disagrees with you on Hillary you imply she is dumb? hrmjustin May 2014 #19
If she honestly believes Hillary is like FDR, yes, she is not very bright. closeupready May 2014 #25
Sorry but she was a highly intelligent agent of the CIA. hrmjustin May 2014 #26
She wouldn't be the first person I've ever met who was well-qualified in their area winter is coming May 2014 #27
Well thats certainly true. hrmjustin May 2014 #29
Okay, I have no reason to second guess that she is intelligent, but closeupready May 2014 #31
I agree he is one of a kind. I like Hillary but I respect your opinion. hrmjustin May 2014 #34
Okay, me, too. Peace. closeupready May 2014 #35
Peace. hrmjustin May 2014 #45
Maybe that's just her opinion-what's wrong with that? We all have them. nt babylonsister May 2014 #82
My opinion is her opinion is idiotic. Is there s.th. wrong with THAT? closeupready May 2014 #87
Perhaps she is not the one with the "illumination" problem... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #38
That's a fucked-up chart, the opposite of Libertarian isn't Populist bananas May 2014 #129
No matter how you slice it....still not Republican! or even Moderate... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #140
On the contrary, she's a right-wing authoritarian, here are more accurate charts bananas May 2014 #146
and where are ALL her speeches and votes to support this bullshit contention as MY graph has? hmmm?? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #147
Excuse me? That is some sexist shit, right there. nt msanthrope May 2014 #23
lol closeupready May 2014 #24
An NOC Undercover officer only famous for their looks... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #33
That's a sexist comment. Beacool May 2014 #37
It's not sexist, but I'm not going to argue with anyone here about that. closeupready May 2014 #63
You display an astonishing ignorance regarding Valerie Plame's resume.... Hekate May 2014 #104
... closeupready May 2014 #136
When you see her platform you'll call her a liar. joshcryer May 2014 #114
All I can say is I sure hope so. I'll support her if she wins the nomination, closeupready May 2014 #135
That sounds like something Rove would say. greatlaurel May 2014 #141
loleresting to me. Whisp May 2014 #5
k/r Dawson Leery May 2014 #7
Question regarding terminology frazzled May 2014 #8
In the terminolgy used by the Head of the CIA under Oath, she was a "Covert Agent" Bandit May 2014 #13
It means nothing to me beyond ... frazzled May 2014 #15
Dumbass conservatives were claiming she was a "glorified secretary" bananas May 2014 #128
K & R Thinkingabout May 2014 #11
Oops, under the bus with Valerie. Beacool May 2014 #12
Of course she is! ... The same way Obama is a "progressive." 1000words May 2014 #20
He is.... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #39
LOL VanRhap. You're gonna make the anti-Hillary crowd wince and weep with your facts. BlueCaliDem May 2014 #42
Comparing Hillary to FDR is kinda like comparing a stale Twinkie to 10 course banquet. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #32
In what way are they similar? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #40
She's a war mongering, money grubbing, corporatist, populist liberal. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #58
No she isn't.... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #74
A lot of your facts verify my position. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #99
Here she is on Trade.... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #75
Did she mention all that during her $400,000 gig for Goldman Sachs? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #78
Does that negate everything else she has ever done? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #88
It just shows she's a politician in bed with the corporations. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #98
No it doesn't.... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #105
She accepts payoffs from corporations. How does that fit in with the above? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #108
and who are you going to vote for that won't? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #110
I'm against money in politics. Are you? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #111
I will be voting for whomever wins the Democratic primary....You? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #112
I already said who I'll be voting for. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #118
I will be voting for the Democrat....because I am a Democrat...You? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #119
I'll be voting for the most progressive, anti-war, candidate on the ballot. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #121
I have always voted for the most Liberal Dem candidate..that is why I voted for Hillary Clinton VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #122
And for the icing on the cake...on Corporations... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #77
You left out the part about the $400,000 gig with Goldman Sachs. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #100
aaaaaaannnnnddddd you think a President Elizabeth Warren or President Bernie Sanders VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #102
I don't know. Do you? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #106
Really now? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #107
and furthermore... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #109
Valerie and her husband are actual heroes, patriots, shit most of us know nothing randys1 May 2014 #36
No she isnt "Middle of the road" VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #41
Would love to believe that, for me she would have to raise top tax rates back to Nixon days, for one randys1 May 2014 #43
Its true read the site...her speeches and voting record is right there.... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #46
Again, to me a liberal would raise tax rates, probably do some protectionism with trade, etc randys1 May 2014 #47
You can't go by what just YOU think.....its not like that... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #49
OK, you win...I will work for her campaign regardless, but until you raise taxes randys1 May 2014 #51
I know you will.....I read your posts... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #52
Is she for a single payer health care? a true Universal system? randys1 May 2014 #53
That's already in the PPACA. No need for Hillary to restart a Teabagger fight for something that BlueCaliDem May 2014 #56
and...on Govt Reform... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #50
Keep fighting the nay sayers VR mcar May 2014 #55
HRC is more Liberal than President Obama! BlueCaliDem May 2014 #44
Yes she is! VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #48
...... oneofthe99 May 2014 #62
Well except for the those FACTS that are used to make those graphs.... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #72
Thank you for posting the facts. Very refreshing and greatly needed. greatlaurel May 2014 #142
My pleasure... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #144
she would like to more liberally send bombs to other countries. Whisp May 2014 #57
Not sure this is true. She voted "yes" for Iraq. He voted yes for "Afghanistan". That makes them McCamy Taylor May 2014 #66
. ProSense May 2014 #68
It's a 10 ProSense May 2014 #70
Well said greatlaurel May 2014 #137
Well, if Valerie and Joe are 4 Hill we 7wo7rees May 2014 #54
How absurd oneofthe99 May 2014 #60
Looks like nobody read the article MFrohike May 2014 #64
I read it. But a comparison to FDR is always a "parental" one. He was "dad". Meaning Hillary McCamy Taylor May 2014 #67
Fair point MFrohike May 2014 #97
LOL!! nt m-lekktor May 2014 #69
FDR ( personal hero of mine) was certainly flawed : SC stack attempt; internment camps, etc. ... AzDar May 2014 #71
"Sweep of experience"? WorseBeforeBetter May 2014 #79
So, is this the deal now? scarletwoman May 2014 #85
Why not? Beacool May 2014 #116
I'm not sure you understood my point. scarletwoman May 2014 #125
OK. Beacool May 2014 #130
ProSense was a huge Clinton basher in 2008. joshcryer May 2014 #117
"...just posting this way to rile people up." scarletwoman May 2014 #126
Well, ProSense May 2014 #131
"...I posted it because she said it and I came across it." And I'll grant you, that's a fair cop. scarletwoman May 2014 #145
One word: Lewinsky Major Hogwash May 2014 #123
sorry DonCoquixote May 2014 #124
Please remind me whether I'm on a Democratic site. Beacool May 2014 #139
The comparison is on her breadth of experience making policy IronLionZion May 2014 #143
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Former Spy Valerie Pl...»Reply #133