Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)President Obama: "The problem is I don’t have enough votes -- full stop" [View all]

President Obama swings Babe Ruth's bat as he tours the National Baseball Hall of Fame
excerpt from remarks by President Obama at DSCC Dinner -- May 23, Chicago, IL:
. . . I need a new Congress. But at a minimum, Ive got to have a Democratic Senate. And thats why youre here. Which leads me to my last point: If, in fact, people agree with us, why is it so hard for us to get a Democratic Senate and a Democratic House? Well, part of it is demographics. I was in Brooklyn with de Blasio -- this is right before he was about to be elected -- and we were coming from this wonderful school thats training kids in math and science. And were driving down Brooklyn and crowds are cheering, and we go into this place to buy some cheesecake and people are hugging me -- and, oh, my uncle just got on Obamacare and its terrific. And a woman yells out, what can I do to help? And I said, move to Nebraska! (Laughter.) I dont need 80 percent of the vote in New York City -- (laughter) -- or Chicago. But Democrats tend to congregate a little more densely, which puts us at a disadvantage in the House. Obviously, the nature of the Senate means that California has the same number of Senate seats as Wyoming. That puts us at a disadvantage. Gerrymandering in many of these states puts us at a disadvantage.
So there are some structural reasons why, despite the fact that Republican ideas are largely rejected by the public, its still hard for us to break through. But the second reason is we have a congenital disease, which is we dont like voting in midterms. Our voters are younger, more minorities, more single women, more working-class folks who are busy and trying to get to work, trying to find work. And oftentimes we opt out during midterms. If we had the same turnout in 2012 that we had had in 2010, I might have lost. Instead, of course, we had a very significant and solid victory.
So this is pretty straightforward -- I need more votes. I need more people voting to reflect our values and what we care about and our stance on the issues, which, in turn, leads to senators and congressman who then vote on behalf of actually getting stuff done. A bunch of you, because youve known me for a long time, came up and commiserated while we were taking pictures -- oh, these folks are so mean and theres always slinging and hurling stones and arrows at you, and all this. And I said, you know what, it turns out -- maybe Im from Chicago -- Im a tough guy. It doesnt really bother me too much.
There is one thing that bothers me, which is when I hear folks saying, oh, you know, if you just play golf with John Boehner more -- (laughter) -- and were just trying harder to be more bipartisan, then wed get more stuff done. Thats not the problem. (Laughter.) On every issue we are more than happy to sit down in reasonable fashion and compromise. The problem is not that were too mean or were too partisan. The problem is I dont have enough votes -- full stop.
The first two years, when we had a Democratic House and a Democratic Senate, we had the most productive legislature since the 1960s, since Lyndon Johnson -- more significant, meaningful domestic legislation than any time since Medicare was passed. House Republicans take over and we now have -- you remember Harry Truman with the do-nothing Congress? This is a less productive Congress than the do-nothing Congress. (Laughter.) This Congress makes the do-nothing Congress look like the New Deal. (Laughter.)
So I need everybody to feel a sense of urgency. Thats what were here tonight to talk about. And whatever else I say, whatever issues you are concerned about, ultimately it translates into math -- are we turning out voters who, in turn, produce majorities that allow us to advance the values that we care about. Everything else is just talk. And if we dont feel that sense of urgency in this election, were going to have problems. And if we do, then in the next two and half years we can make as much progress as we did the first two years I was in office.
read entire speech: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/05/23/remarks-president-dscc-dinner-chicago-il

Doug Mills @dougmillsnyt
President Obama gets breakfast at Valois Cafeteria in Chicago, IL, eggs, bacon & hash browns.. pic.twitter.com/eqAfGVs67B
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama: "The problem is I don’t have enough votes -- full stop" [View all]
bigtree
May 2014
OP
there has NEVER been a sufficient number of republicans willing to bend to progressive legislation
bigtree
May 2014
#46
Obama should have come down hard on the banks and the crimes of the previous
JDPriestly
May 2014
#63
This is the truth. During PBO's terms the R's have never been willing to work with him or the Dems.
bluesbassman
May 2014
#54
Huh? Reagan had to raise taxes 3 times because of Congress. Nixon had to start the EPA
Recursion
May 2014
#107
No, we had it for less than a month. The Senate required a supermajority to overcome
pnwmom
May 2014
#41
If moderate and conservate Dems show up for the midterms, we will win back the House.
Rex
May 2014
#4
If the Far Left stops joining the Republicans to depress the vote by also telling them
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#10
Funny, I've never had a friend in RL think that way...I've only seen 3 or 4 people here type that.
Rex
May 2014
#12
and no wonder they don't..the ones who present themselves as the "smartest ones in class"
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#15
But what we are really talking about motivating is the proverbial "mushy middle"
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#27
They sure as shit have no problem trying "shame" everyone else for voting for Democrats
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#31
I have a hard time believeing someone is a Democrat if they shame others for voting D.
Rex
May 2014
#34
Well some are not really Democrats thats for sure....they just have no where else to go...
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#73
Ok, so it's not the "far left" media influencing these non-voters, it's...
WorseBeforeBetter
May 2014
#87
If you think "shaming" those who criticize Obama Administration policies...
WorseBeforeBetter
May 2014
#100
I know right? Even literally saving your very life is not good enough for some folks!
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#76
Didn't Lamont win and didn't Obama back him in the general and didn't he still lose?
Drunken Irishman
May 2014
#39
So, had he only backed Lincoln's opponent in Arkansas, everything would've been fine?
Drunken Irishman
May 2014
#38
It was realistic enough to scare the White House into spending a BUNCH of money..
bvar22
May 2014
#71
It proves Blanche Lincoln was working for, not against BO when she dragged her feet on ACA.
GoneFishin
May 2014
#85
Obama had plenty of Political Coin because The Will of the People supported him
Tommymac
May 2014
#47
you know his position on those issues, but even if he agreed with your positions
bigtree
May 2014
#84
But if he is going to enact a Republican agenda, and everyone knows that, the 2008 voters
Doctor_J
May 2014
#86