Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Social Security Threatens To Close All Field Offices [View all]Divernan
(15,480 posts)11. You don't know jack - one can still collect SS at 62
And people like you spreading this type of misinformation is EXACTLY the reason why face-to-face interaction at local social secuity offices is vital so claimants are not screwed out of benefits they have earned over their lifetimes.
You can start your Social Security retirement benefits as early as age 62, but the benefit amount you receive will be less than your full retirement benefit amount.
If you start your benefits early, they will be reduced based on the number of months you receive benefits before you reach your full retirement age. If your:
full retirement age is 66, the reduction of your benefits at age 62 is 25 percent; at age 63, it is about 20 percent; at age 64, it is about 13.3 percent; and at age 65, it is about 6.7 percent.
full retirement age is older than 66 (that is, you were born after 1954), you can still start your retirement benefits at 62 but the reduction in your benefit amount will be greater, up to a maximum of 30 percent at age 62 for people born in 1960 and later.
http://www.ssa.gov/retire2/applying2.htm
One of the most complex issues is determining what would maximize your payouts -whether to claim benefits at age 62 through your spouse, ex-spouse, deceased spouse, or deceased ex-spouse, or on your own earnings record. You can take early retirement at 62 on your spouse's earnings records, and then when you reach your own full retirement age, switch to collecting on your own earnings record. Or the opposite, claim on your own record at 62 and switch to your spouse's later. The excellent staffs at the SS field office can provide you with all the necessary information in a half hour appointment. You can then take time to think about it and call back with your decision. If you decide right then, the staff take it from there and your payments or adjusted payments will kick in within a month.
If you were married for the requisite number of years to qualify to make a spousal claim, got divorced, remarried for the requisite number of years to spouse number 2, and then were widowed or got a second divorce, you have a choice to claim on your own earnings records OR the records of EITHER the first or second spouse. You have to have certified copies of marriage, divorce and death records for SS to access spouse's earnings records on your behalf. This procedure can be mind-boggling for many people but especially to poorly educated, unsophisticated claimants Try straightening all this out with a computer, or with an 800 number outsourced to India.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They'll mail out ONCE every 5 yrs., & only to those not registered on website.
Divernan
May 2014
#30
They'll just get rid of SS. What do they care? They could give a shit about Americans. nt
valerief
May 2014
#38
This will make it especially hard on some disabled people who need a hand with the process,
pinto
May 2014
#6
I'm 64. I did the math. If I take SS at 66 and live to 85, I'll earn X dollars. If I take SS at 70
WinkyDink
May 2014
#79
But if one croaks early, he/she isn't worrying about what they didn't spend, trust me.
WinkyDink
May 2014
#103
Divernan, you seem to have a lot better grasp of the situation than I do.
Rhymes With Orange
May 2014
#61
I am surprised to find you in this thread. Maybe you didnt get the message. nm
rhett o rick
May 2014
#89
"The People" are the 1%. Everyone else is a pack of expendable moochers. Just got to find a way to
blkmusclmachine
May 2014
#71
Clinton/Gore began the movement for "reinventing government" and "putting people first" in the 90's
kelliekat44
May 2014
#21
The big, bad, ol' GOP. ALWAYS pulling the strings, whether they have a majority OR NOT!
blkmusclmachine
May 2014
#72
I suspect they anticipate some anger as they continue with their agenda.
woo me with science
May 2014
#29
In a nation that serves only the corporations and the one percent this should be no surprise.
Enthusiast
May 2014
#36
Where do you suppose Mr. Third Way will go in 2017? Somebody's gonna repay him for all the favors he
blkmusclmachine
May 2014
#75
Phone calls worked okay for me .... when I had 45 minutes to be on hold. (sarcasm). n/t
DebJ
May 2014
#46
Can't. They're part of the 1% that OWNS Washington DC. "D" and "R" <<alike>> !!!
blkmusclmachine
May 2014
#76
Really maybe all full-time representation should be eliminated. I mean, when congress spends 75%
Ed Suspicious
May 2014
#52
His only interest is to absolve Pres Obama from any guilt for damaging SS. It may
rhett o rick
May 2014
#90
The last two sentences in the OP is EXACTLY THE MOTIVE: CHEATING people out of due $$.
WinkyDink
May 2014
#77
Resolution against Implementing the Social Security Administration’s “Vision 2025”
eridani
May 2014
#95