Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's rare I outright implore people to read an article [View all]treestar
(82,383 posts)98. Mr. Ross took up his case in 1968
Much closer to the time of the occurrences.
There is a lot about slavery. This was interesting:
A heavy account lies against us as a civil society for oppressions committed against people who did not injure us, wrote the Quaker John Woolman in 1769, and that if the particular case of many individuals were fairly stated, it would appear that there was considerable due to them.
As the historian Roy E. Finkenbine has documented, at the dawn of this country, black reparations were actively considered and often effected. Quakers in New York, New England, and Baltimore went so far as to make membership contingent upon compensating ones former slaves. In 1782, the Quaker Robert Pleasants emancipated his 78 slaves, granted them 350 acres, and later built a school on their property and provided for their education. The doing of this justice to the injured Africans, wrote Pleasants, would be an acceptable offering to him who Rules in the kingdom of men.
As the historian Roy E. Finkenbine has documented, at the dawn of this country, black reparations were actively considered and often effected. Quakers in New York, New England, and Baltimore went so far as to make membership contingent upon compensating ones former slaves. In 1782, the Quaker Robert Pleasants emancipated his 78 slaves, granted them 350 acres, and later built a school on their property and provided for their education. The doing of this justice to the injured Africans, wrote Pleasants, would be an acceptable offering to him who Rules in the kingdom of men.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Right, but people in the present have recourse in the present, for the most part.
aikoaiko
May 2014
#9
Is there a statute of limitations on crimes of such magnitude? I don't think so.
sabrina 1
May 2014
#52
Yes, I believe we have fewer morons feeling they can act with impunity against people if they knew
sabrina 1
May 2014
#116
What crime? The deprivation of the human rights and enslavement of an entire population
sabrina 1
May 2014
#105
No it does not. When a country's government is responsible for crimes against humanity, the statute
sabrina 1
May 2014
#115
No statute of limitations on crimes against humanity (mass murder). Just ask Charles Taylor. n/t
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#112
They had no problem charging Taylor under international law, decades after the atrocities
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#114
Land is a huge foundation for a comfortable, better life. A few people I know have
GoneFishin
May 2014
#92
I can't relate to over-the-top weddings. It seems like when a couple is just starting off
GoneFishin
May 2014
#101
"Whether the housing crash "hurt every homeowner" is neither here nor there;"
magical thyme
May 2014
#107
Doesn't seem like you read it then. It's mostly about post-WWII housing policy
Recursion
May 2014
#48
Gah! No, centuries haven't passed. Read the article. It's about postwar housing policy
Recursion
May 2014
#49
Even though the wealthy that was built on that stolen labor remains? eom.
1StrongBlackMan
May 2014
#27
Precisely. The sins (and the oppression) of the fathers passes on to later generations -
whathehell
May 2014
#37
The crimes of black oppression continued legally into the 1960s, so your timeframe is clearly off.
kwassa
May 2014
#75
Reread the exchange that begins with post #16; I think you've come in in the middle. N.T.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2014
#42
And.as Strong black said above, sometimes the wealth changed hands illegitimately too.
panader0
May 2014
#43
Yeah, you didn't read the article either. It is not about slavery, but FHA housing policy.
kwassa
May 2014
#78
I find the article's reasoning to be weak, and its prescriptions antithetical to forward movement.
appal_jack
May 2014
#19
Worked with a teacher who help bust banks with the undercover group on Chicago's South Side.
ancianita
May 2014
#35
Whether or not one agrees with reparations is almost second to me re: this piece
Number23
May 2014
#40