Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The myth of the 'nice guy' and Elliot Rodger. [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)79. i think this was well said. regardless of what you said or not. i do not know that i really paid
any attention to what you were saying. my comment was not to you, cause my response really had nothing to do with you. i like what the poster said not in relations to you.
being incredibly dismissive of something that is clearly a contributing factor to violence. A system of male entitlement and female inferiority is a huge factor in the treatment of women, and violence is part of that. Claiming it was "just an excuse" and "any would do" skates over the fact that women are targeted by men for being women in SO MANY WAYS.
This nonsense also misses the point HUGELY, because the fact that you believe that blaming women MAKES HIM APPEAR LESS BAD OR MORE SYMPATHETIC, that should tell you it's a huge effing problem.
This nonsense also misses the point HUGELY, because the fact that you believe that blaming women MAKES HIM APPEAR LESS BAD OR MORE SYMPATHETIC, that should tell you it's a huge effing problem.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And that's why I ain't joinin' 'em. Instigate... sure. Stand with them? Nope. n/t
cherokeeprogressive
May 2014
#34
right. a thread moments ago. you immediately derailing and dismissing. me discussing.
seabeyond
May 2014
#38
Being "nice" doesn't mean being a doormat, necessarily. It's not so black and white. n/t
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#58
I think being a "monster" was the whole point....he was a very sick person....a schizophrenic
VanillaRhapsody
May 2014
#37
+1000 He would have found another convenient grievance for his murderous rage
Tom Ripley
May 2014
#40
Well, it is appropriate that you are addressing your heavily-capped astonishment at that poster...
Tom Ripley
May 2014
#75
i think this was well said. regardless of what you said or not. i do not know that i really paid
seabeyond
May 2014
#79
No, I don't think that blaming women, Satan, the Jews, the government, the Illuminati, God...
Tom Ripley
May 2014
#74
not really. that goes along the lines of, .... all women are liars. no more true than
seabeyond
May 2014
#81
As a supporter of equal rights for women, I don't expect anything from women.....
Darkhawk32
May 2014
#17
What's the shame about it? You equate not placing the opposite sex on a pedestal and
Darkhawk32
May 2014
#49
The hostility is only your perception and your expectation of unwarranted and unearned praise.
Darkhawk32
May 2014
#64
Fair enough. Honestly, I'm just scratching my head as to why you seem so angry.
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#66
Because vitriol worse than I have ever put forth is being directed on men on DU because of this....
Darkhawk32
May 2014
#68
To be honest, I think the biggest problem here is you taking certain posts so personally.
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#73
And that is very wrong, and should not be tolerated. I'm sorry you had to deal with that. Honestly.
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#80
Oh for sure. The numbers are skewed against women, no denying that, but the amount of violence
Darkhawk32
May 2014
#83
No disagreement from me. Violence is an enormous human problem, even more so when
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#86
I've always considered myself to be a "nice guy" but never tried to push myself
Darkhawk32
May 2014
#87
I've been there too, though thankfully none of the young women (to my knowlege) were physically
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#88
But, in seems in DU lately, just having that frustration makes you a misogynist. Sad. n/t
Darkhawk32
May 2014
#89
I wouldn't say it's "having" it so much as what you do with it. Or how you express it.
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#90
From what I've read, even "having" it got you into trouble. But hopefully, this will pass.
Darkhawk32
May 2014
#91
A woman with high self-esteem is going to be attracted to nice guys, not jerks n/t
Yavin4
May 2014
#100
YOU... are da man, of the moment. this is an excellent post. spelled out so well.
seabeyond
May 2014
#22
I don't know that anyone believed Elliot Rodger to be a nice guy, except himself.
LisaL
May 2014
#53
That's a great way to make someone see how ridiculous the "friend zone is a personal insult"
Squinch
May 2014
#103
Being (genuinely) nice is all well and good, but you have to be interesting too.
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#63
Be the best person that you can be. If that's not good enough for some people, so what.
Yavin4
May 2014
#97
It's not about being a "nice" guy. It's about being the best that you can be and being happy
Yavin4
May 2014
#99
BecIf your being nice to a woman is contingent on her having sex with you (but viewing her as dirt
MillennialDem
May 2014
#110
Interestingly, women are never "friend-zoned"; they are usually rejected outright.
alarimer
May 2014
#120