Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

polly7

(20,582 posts)
12. As will I.
Mon May 26, 2014, 02:29 AM
May 2014

Last edited Mon May 26, 2014, 03:00 AM - Edit history (1)

Vandana Shiva, a woman who cares deeply for millions of people affected in terrible ways by GMOs.

Vandana Shiva’s Message for the March against Monsanto

People often ask me “Why Monsanto”?
My response is, we did not choose to target Monsanto, Monsanto chose to target our seed and food freedom, our scientific and democratic institutions, our very lives.

Monsanto has admitted it wrote the intellectual property treaty of WTO that allows seeds to be redefined as Monsanto’s intellectual property. And it is through patents that Monsanto, a poison maker, has become a seed giant, with the largest share in control over the seed market. In India it controls 95% of the cotton seed market, and the extraction of superprofits through royalties has trapped our small farmers in unpayable debt. 284,000 farmers have committed suicide in India because of debt linked to seed and chemicals.

Corporations like Monsanto were behind the EC Seed law that would have made diversity and seed saving illegal in Europe. The last parliament sent back the law to the European commission. We must ensure that the new parliament does not pass the law.

In the US, Monsanto used its money to undermine the Right of US citizens to Know what they eat. It is threatening the State of Vermont because it got a labelling law in place. And it now has introduced a bill in Congress called called The Safe and Accurate Food Labelling Act which has earned itself the name the Dark (Deny Americans the Right to Know) Act.

This is an assault on Democracy and people’s freedom.
While Monsanto announces that it is retreating from Europe, it is pushing GMOs on the Eastern European countries. And is pushing new trade treaties like TIPP, to undermine Europe’s largely GMO free status, and to get stronger IPR rights on seed.

http://seedfreedom.in/vandana-shivas-message-for-the-march-against-monsanto/


Reforms not working

However, both the food crisis and the economic crisis are a result of the so-called reforms. More people are denied their right to food because, on the one hand the livelihoods of small and marginal farmers are being destroyed to carry out the reforms of corporatising the agriculture sector, with corporate seeds and chemical products, and corporate procurement instead of public procurement. The result is debt, hunger and despair.

One out of every four Indians today is a victim of hunger. And half of the hungry are farmers who cannot eat what they grow, either because they are planting cash crops such as cotton; or they're growing costly crops such as rice, wheat and corn, which they have to sell in order to repay the loans they get to buy seeds, fertilisers, etc.

That is why lowering the cost of production and increasing the livelihood sustainability of small and marginal farmers must be the first step in building food security. However, the Food Security Act is totally silent on production, procurement, and farmers' livelihood and food rights. This in my view is its biggest failing.

The silence on production makes many people feel that the Food Security Act could increase India's dependence on food imports. We are already spending millions of dollars in importing and subsidising pulses - grain legumes - and edible oils. Until the Green Revolution, India was the biggest producer and exporter of oilseeds and pulses.The Greed Revolution which is based on rice and wheat production has destroyed our self-sufficiency in pulses and oilseeds, and the globalisation and libralisation of the food trade has made it worse. We need to introdruce tariffs on imports of edible oils and pulses, both to give our farmers a level playing field, and to reduce our trade and budget deficits.


Full Article: http://www.zcommunications.org/indias-food-security-act-myths-and-reality-by-vandana-shiva.html

"In fact, to take advantage of these seeds, small farmers who are among the hungriest people in the world, have to take out loans to buy the costly products that are required—the seeds, the fertilizers... and the pesticides that are required" for the GMO seeds.

"So in fact the honorees ... are actually contributing the problems that keep us locked... in hundreds of millions of people in a world where there is plenty of food," concluded Lappe.

The World Food Prize explained that the GMO work by the new winners has "contributed significantly to increasing the quantity and availability of food."

Not so, says Shiva.

"The evidence is so clear," she says, that "GMOs have not increased production, there's a failure to yield." In addition, "they have not reduced use of chemicals. Worse, they have increased the use of chemicals because they have created superpests and superweeds."

Full Article: http://www.zcommunications.org/frances-moore-lappe-vandana-shiva-blast-award-for-gmo-scientists-by-andrea-germanos


Vandana Shiva - We Don’t Need Genetically Engineered Bananas For Iron Deficiency

Saturday, April 27, 2013

The latest insanity from the genetic engineers is to push GMO bananas on India for reducing iron deficiency in Indian women.

Nature has given us a cornucopia of biodiversity, rich in nutrients. Malnutrition and nutrient deficiency results from destroying biodiversity, and with it rich sources of nutrition.

The Green Revolution has spread monocultures of chemical rice and wheat, driving out biodiversity from our farms and diets.

And what survived as spontaneous crops like the amaranth greens and chenopodium (bathua) which are rich in iron were sprayed with poisons and herbicides. Instead of being seen as iron rich and vitamin rich gifts, they were treated as “weeds”. A Monsanto representative once said that Genetically Engineered crops resistant to their propriety herbicide Roundup killed the weeds that “steal the Sunshine”. And their RoundUp Ads in India tell women “Liberate yourself, use Roundup”. This is not a recipe for liberation, but being trapped in malnutrition.

Full Article: http://www.zcommunications.org/we-don-t-need-genetically-engineered-bananas-for-iron-deficiency-by-vandana-shiva

Seeds of Suicide
By Vandana Shiva
Source: Asian Ag
Thursday, April 04, 2013

“Monsanto is an agricultural company.
We apply innovation and technology to help farmers around the world produce more while conserving more.”
“Producing more, Conserving more, Improving farmers lives.”

These are the promises Monsanto India’s website makes, alongside pictures of smiling, prosperous farmers from the state of Maharashtra. This is a desperate attempt by Monsanto and its PR machinery to delink the epidemic of farmers’ suicides in India from the company’s growing control over cotton seed supply — 95 per cent of India’s cotton seed is now controlled by Monsanto.

A Monsanto representative admitted that they were “the patient’s diagnostician, and physician all in one” in writing the patents on life-forms, from micro-organisms to plants, in the TRIPS’ agreement of WTO. Stopping farmers from saving seeds and exercising their seed sovereignty was the main objective. Monsanto is now extending its patents to conventionally bred seed, as in the case of broccoli and capsicum, or the low gluten wheat it had pirated from India which we challenged as a biopiracy case in the European Patent office.

That is why we have started Fibres of Freedom in the heart of Monsanto’s Bt cotton/suicide belt in Vidharba. We have created community seed banks with indigenous seeds and helped farmers go organic. No GMO seeds, no debt, no suicides.

Full Article: http://www.zcommunications.org/seeds-of-suicide-by-vandana-shiva

VANDANA SHIVA: I’m here in Los Angeles to address a conference on International Women’s Day on global ecologies, on how globalization, shaped by a very patriarchal mindset, a capitalist, patriarchal mindset, has actually aggravated the violence against women, that we are living in a very violent economic order to which war has become essential—war against the earth, war against women’s bodies, war against local economies and war against democracy. And I think we need to see the connections between all these forms of violence, which impact women most. Whether it’s climate change or biodiversity erosion or seed monopolies, all of it is connected. It’s one piece.

VANDANA SHIVA: I think this case is not just about Bowman, the Indiana farmer. It’s about every farmer, every person and every seed in the world. First, the idea that Monsanto can patent a seed by putting a toxic gene for Roundup resistance into a plant, that that is a creation of seed, that has evolved over millennia, been bred over thousands of years in East Asia, not by Monsanto—how can we be governed by an illusion that introducing a toxic gene is creation of life? It’s an error. And it is this error that compelled me 26 years ago to start Navdanya, the movement for seed saving in India, because I do not think seed is invented, and therefore, a patent on seed is wrong from the first step.

In India, this kind of false claim to creation, false claim to invention, the collection of royalties from seed, has led to Monsanto controlling 95 percent of the cottonseed supply, 95 percent through a monopoly, not through the choice of the farmers, as it’s often made out to be. Farmers are getting indebted because the price of seed jumped 8,000 percent, and there’s no option, except the little options we are creating through Navdanya by saving open-pollinated seed.

Two hundred and seventy thousand Indian farmers have committed suicide since Monsanto entered the Indian seed market. That’s more than a quarter-million. It’s a genocide. And every farmer who commits suicide leaves behind a widow. For me, this is a prime example of violence against women through violent economic means.


Full Article: http://www.zcommunications.org/vandana-shiva-on-int-l-women-s-day-capitalist-patriarchy-has-aggravated-violence-against-women-by-vandana-shiva

"Born in India in 1952, Vandana Shiva is a world-renowned environmental leader and thinker. Director of the Research Foundation on Science, Technology, and Ecology, she is the author of many books, including Water Wars: Pollution, Profits, and Privatization (South End Press, 2001), Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge (South End Press, 1997), Monocultures of the Mind (Zed, 1993), The Violence of the Green Revolution (Zed, 1992), and Staying Alive (St. Martin's Press, 1989).

Shiva is a leader in the International Forum on Globalization, along with Ralph Nader and Jeremy Rifkin. She addressed the World Trade Organization summit in Seattle, 1999, as well as the recent World Economic Forum in Melbourne , 2000. In 1993, Shiva won the Alternative Nobel Peace Prize (the Right Livelihood Award). The founder of Navdanya (“nine seeds”), a movement promoting diversity and use of native seeds, she also set up the Research Foundation for Science, Technology, and Ecology in her mother’s cowshed in 1997. Its studies have validated the ecological value of traditional farming and been instrumental in fighting destructive development projects in India .

Before becoming an activist, Shiva was one of India ’s leading physicists. She holds a master’s degree in the philosophy of science and a Ph.D. in particle physics."

http://www.livingunderdrones.org/ ~~~~GO LEAFS! ~~~~~ http://www.journeyman.tv/66218/short

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And this is important to you exactly why? hedda_foil May 2014 #1
Probably because the GMO issue is not as cut and dried as some make it out to be Major Nikon May 2014 #4
Watch this 2naSalit May 2014 #10
I'm not so easily convinced Major Nikon May 2014 #11
Hmmm 2naSalit May 2014 #31
There's plenty of reasons to hate on Monsanto without making them up Major Nikon May 2014 #125
Well 2naSalit May 2014 #157
People have been outsmarting nature for thousands of years Major Nikon May 2014 #159
Have to 2naSalit May 2014 #163
That's a bad propaganda video. It promotes nothing but myths. HuckleB May 2014 #21
Gary Null is a fucking idiot... SidDithers May 2014 #24
Didn't know that... 2naSalit May 2014 #32
No worries. And I apologize for jumping all over you... SidDithers May 2014 #33
Yikes 2naSalit May 2014 #35
Some of it is, and some of it isn't. LWolf May 2014 #37
Perhaps because people push her as a spokesperson. HuckleB May 2014 #14
As with many things, there are shades of gray in this discussion. NRaleighLiberal May 2014 #2
Reality is important. HuckleB May 2014 #15
Again, definitions. NRaleighLiberal May 2014 #22
Again, that works for a few small farmers. HuckleB May 2014 #45
Vandana Shiva is someone who knows damn well how multinational corporate agribiz is destroying scarletwoman May 2014 #3
As will I. polly7 May 2014 #12
Great Post! burrowowl May 2014 #48
Thank you Polly. bravenak May 2014 #59
How is it "great info?" HuckleB May 2014 #60
Why should i have to prove anything?? I never claimed to be a scientist. bravenak May 2014 #64
So you don't know when something is baseless propaganda? HuckleB May 2014 #65
No. bravenak May 2014 #73
And labeling GMOs won't tell you one valuable thing about the product. HuckleB May 2014 #75
It will tell me the thing i want to know. bravenak May 2014 #87
Believe it or not, you're not the center of the universe. HuckleB May 2014 #89
You are also not the center of the universe. bravenak May 2014 #90
Prove that I'm wrong. HuckleB May 2014 #91
No. bravenak May 2014 #101
Again, you have no reason to label. You just want to be the center of the universe. HuckleB May 2014 #103
Allergies to food. bravenak May 2014 #108
I'm sorry that happened to you. HuckleB May 2014 #110
Can you prove that cross breeding with food that i am allergic to wont cause a reaction? bravenak May 2014 #119
What is the point of a "genetically modified" label, alp227 May 2014 #92
The point is that i want to know. bravenak May 2014 #97
The reality is that you are safer with GMO than you would be otherwise in that regard Major Nikon May 2014 #131
The reality is that i want to know. bravenak May 2014 #136
So what if I want to know if the produce I buy has been fertilized by cow shit? Major Nikon May 2014 #139
You should be allowed to have access to the info. bravenak May 2014 #143
There's a difference between having access to the information and labeling Major Nikon May 2014 #144
If a company doesn't want to label the products. bravenak May 2014 #145
There is almost no commercially produced food that isn't genetically modified Major Nikon May 2014 #126
I need to know if they cross breed it with something i can't eat. bravenak May 2014 #128
How do you know this about any product, GMO or otherwise? Major Nikon May 2014 #137
I do not have the most common food allergies. bravenak May 2014 #142
The question remains: Why are you bringing up allergies? HuckleB May 2014 #147
Makes sense to me. bravenak May 2014 #148
How does that connect to GMOs? HuckleB May 2014 #152
We went in a circle. bravenak May 2014 #153
You evaded the questions. HuckleB May 2014 #154
You tag teamer. bravenak May 2014 #161
You did great, bravenak.. thank you! Cha May 2014 #156
He actually made me more skeptical than i had been before. bravenak May 2014 #158
Monsanto and their spawns are very afraid of "labels".. they also do not want to tell Cha May 2014 #162
Thats what i figured. bravenak May 2014 #164
They've given us no reason to "trust" them.. with their sleazy orwellian bullshit. nm Cha May 2014 #165
Amen. Nt. bravenak May 2014 #166
Just a FYI, bravenak.. "My Throat Is On Fire - RoundUp" Cha May 2014 #171
Thank you, Cha! bravenak May 2014 #172
Then prove her assertions. HuckleB May 2014 #16
And now for something completely different rocktivity May 2014 #5
So, instead of peer reviewed research, you offered a really bad video. HuckleB May 2014 #17
Children as propaganda 101 mathematic May 2014 #26
I know which potato I'd "go to" rocktivity May 2014 #36
gmo escapes Leme May 2014 #6
Dr. Shiva IS an eco warrior goddess. nt Hekate May 2014 #7
So, anti-science, dishonest individual equates to that? HuckleB May 2014 #18
I wonder how many who condemn Jenny Mccarthy alp227 May 2014 #93
Monsanto is the bestest n/t 951-Riverside May 2014 #8
Science also gave us Thalidomide, Fukushima, and Global Warming. Downwinder May 2014 #9
I like red herring, too! HuckleB May 2014 #19
And insulin, space travel and the internet...nt SidDithers May 2014 #25
No. Shitty corporate practices gave us those. NuclearDem May 2014 #28
Exactly. Aerows May 2014 #39
And corrected those mistakes. nt alp227 May 2014 #94
"True experts" PaulaFarrell May 2014 #13
2000 peer reviewed studies, all assessed by independent scientists. HuckleB May 2014 #20
Do YOU have a link to that study? n/t angstlessk May 2014 #23
This piece covers it. HuckleB May 2014 #53
Any links to long term studies of human consumption? MohRokTah May 2014 #30
Any links to studies of long term human consumption of hybrids created by other technologies? HuckleB May 2014 #46
I don't trust GMO food for one single reason. MohRokTah May 2014 #27
Hogwash. HuckleB May 2014 #62
GMO is NOT Hybrid tehnology. so YOU are spreading HOGWASH! MohRokTah May 2014 #67
Yes, it is. HuckleB May 2014 #88
You say there is potential harm, burden of proof is on you. alp227 May 2014 #98
You build the strawman to tear it down. MohRokTah May 2014 #100
It appears that you don't know what a strawman is, even though you sure build enough of them. HuckleB May 2014 #106
Oh, and you might tell your friend or your sock or whatever... MohRokTah May 2014 #111
Who is she? A physicist. TBF May 2014 #29
Unfortunately... HuckleB May 2014 #52
Pure, peer-reviewed, repeatable science is a wonderful thing. DisgustipatedinCA May 2014 #34
And your point? HuckleB May 2014 #58
My point is that I don't believe that all the science around GMOs is clean. DisgustipatedinCA May 2014 #63
2000 peer reviewed and post-publication criticized studies. HuckleB May 2014 #66
Here are my thoughts Aerows May 2014 #38
I'm not a fan of the corporations. HuckleB May 2014 #55
"do not appear to be any worse" Aerows May 2014 #95
So you think a single corporation controls the food supply? HuckleB May 2014 #96
GMO technology, in my opinion, is not the issue. Aerows May 2014 #99
But who has the market cornered? HuckleB May 2014 #102
So be it. Aerows May 2014 #105
So you can't answer my question. HuckleB May 2014 #109
No I answered you. Aerows May 2014 #113
Let consumers decide! Why do you hate informed consumers? closeupready May 2014 #40
Putting a label on GMOs offer no information of value whatsoever. HuckleB May 2014 #51
Oh bullshit. killbotfactory May 2014 #167
Informed of what? Informed of what? alp227 May 2014 #115
Dishonest of you, and very disappointing. closeupready May 2014 #122
What if just don't want to eat anything GMO? Can I have a choice? L0oniX May 2014 #41
You have a choice. HuckleB May 2014 #47
I'll give you a time machine. alp227 May 2014 #118
Good luck with your false equivalency. L0oniX May 2014 #121
What do you mean, false equivalency? alp227 May 2014 #124
Sure, you can eat organic or that which is labeled non-GMO Major Nikon May 2014 #149
The Republican War on the Feminine Continues - Sockpuppet style AceAcme May 2014 #42
And, as usual, you can't argue for your assertions. HuckleB May 2014 #54
Howdy Berlum! NuclearDem May 2014 #61
Now that does explain it! HuckleB May 2014 #77
*Smirk*...nt SidDithers May 2014 #133
If there is no issue with GMO's SomethingFishy May 2014 #43
There is no logical reason to label it. HuckleB May 2014 #49
Then why do Gov'ts in Europe TBF May 2014 #56
Politics. HuckleB May 2014 #57
Again with the false comparisons to hybrids MohRokTah May 2014 #68
You're the one spreading misinformation. HuckleB May 2014 #71
You are spreading even more BULLSHIT. MohRokTah May 2014 #76
So you don't understand genetics. HuckleB May 2014 #78
No, you don't understand agriculture. MohRokTah May 2014 #80
So all you can do is offer up the usual anti-GMO cliches. HuckleB May 2014 #81
So all you can offer are the standard pro-GMO lies? MohRokTah May 2014 #84
Prove that I've lied about anything regarding GMOs. HuckleB May 2014 #86
A paid industry shill would not be so earnest. U4ikLefty May 2014 #120
Some argue for the sake of arguing. MohRokTah May 2014 #129
It's new technology that is completely untested in the long term MohRokTah May 2014 #69
Oddly, you've never cared about other hybrid technologies. HuckleB May 2014 #72
GMO is NOT a hybrid btechnology. MohRokTah May 2014 #79
Now that is beyond the pale. HuckleB May 2014 #85
How exactly is it different? Major Nikon May 2014 #150
Simple MohRokTah May 2014 #155
Both your assertions are demonstratably false Major Nikon May 2014 #168
One other thing. MohRokTah May 2014 #160
If GMO foods are so beneficial why does Monsanto (and others) oppose labeling it GMO? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #44
Why do those who work so hard to demonize GMOs ask this question? HuckleB May 2014 #50
Why do those who oppose labeling have no confidence in the product? MohRokTah May 2014 #70
Try responding the actual content of my posts. HuckleB May 2014 #74
Try responding tot the actual content of my posts. MohRokTah May 2014 #82
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #83
You can get a GMO by cross breeding? immoderate May 2014 #135
It seems a valid question. Why does Monsanto oppose labeling their product? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #104
You're response completely ignores my response. HuckleB May 2014 #107
Why do those who work so hard to demonize GMOs ask this question? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #114
This might help you: NuclearDem May 2014 #112
I think Monsanto is more interested in profits than prophecy. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #116
Not surprised you missed the point entirely. NuclearDem May 2014 #127
Not really. Monsanto is trying to fulfill it's own prophecy about it's product being beneficial. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #132
Woosh. NuclearDem May 2014 #138
If Monsanto is afraid of people that will shun their products Aerows May 2014 #123
No argument from me that Monsanto is a shitbag of a company. NuclearDem May 2014 #130
Agree completely! n/t Aerows May 2014 #134
For the same reasons organic producers would oppose labeling their use of cow shit fertilizer Major Nikon May 2014 #151
My two cents. If GMO's are fine, then GMO companies shouldn't fight against labeling. Period. ancianita May 2014 #117
For me personally, the argument revolves around food control politics Aerows May 2014 #140
The whole strategy of nature being for sale seems to be what this is all about, yeah. ancianita May 2014 #146
By "conventional agriculture" they mean corporate agriculture. ozone_man May 2014 #141
This message was self-deleted by its author A-Schwarzenegger May 2014 #169
Thanks For the OP - You have shined the light of Truth on Corporate GMO Lies. Tommymac May 2014 #170
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #12